ABSTRACT
A hallmark of microbial biofilms is the self-production of extracellular matrix that encases the cells resident within the community. The matrix provides protection from the environment, while spatial heterogeneity of expression influences the structural morphology and colony spreading dynamics. Bacillus subtilis is a model bacterial system used to uncover the regulatory pathways and key building blocks required for biofilm growth and development. Previous reports have suggested that poly-γ-glutamic acid (PGA) production is suppressed during biofilm formation and does not play a major role in biofilm morphology of the undomesticated isolate NCIB 3610. In this work we report on the observation of multiple travelling fronts that develop during the early stage of B. subtilis colony biofilm formation. We find the emergence of a highly motile population of bacteria that is facilitated by the extraction of fluid from the underlying agar substrate. Motility develops behind a moving front of fluid that propagates from the boundary of the biofilm towards the interior. The extent of proliferation is strongly modulated by the presence of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS). We trace the origin of this moving front of fluid to the production of PGA. We find that PGA production is correlated with higher temperatures, resulting in a mature biofilm morphology that is distinct from the biofilm architecture typically associated with B. subtilis. Our results suggest that B. subtilis NCIB 3610 produces distinct biofilm matrices in response to environmental conditions.
Introduction
A common strategy employed by bacteria to mitigate stresses imposed by their environment is to co-exist in sessile communities known as biofilms. The transition from unicellular to multi-cellular life allows the residents to coordinate response to stimuli, share metabolic burdens 1, and protect against external attack by predators 2,3 or antimicrobial agents4,5. This behaviour is ubiquitous across the microbial world and a clear understanding of biofilm genesis, development, and maturation is important not only from a fundamental microbiological perspective but also due to their impact on many industrial, clinical, and biotechnological sectors. For example, biofilms act as sources for many chronic infections and their physical characteristics make them difficult to eradicate 6,7. This intransigence can also impact industrial processes, where biofilms may result in pipe blockages, induce corrosion, or contaminate products 8–10. While there are many negative consequences of biofilm formation, they play important roles in waste water treatment and other bioremediation processes 11–14.
Bacillus subtilis is a Gram-positive bacterium that has been extensively used as a model organism to illuminate the genetic regulation and molecular mechanisms of biofilm formation15. During biofilm formation, production of the extracellular matrix is an essential process that binds the cells together, provides protection from the external environment, and confers advantageous mechanical properties to the community. The primary components of the matrix produced by B. subtilis are the fibrillar protein TasA 16, the hydrophobin-like protein surfactant BslA17–19, and polysaccharides synthesized by products of the epsA-O operon 20. One of the principle regulatory pathways that controls the expression of these components is modulated by the transcription factor Spo0A. Moderate levels of phosphorylated Spo0A activates transcription of the sinI-sinR operon 21,22. SinR is a DNA-binding transcription factor that controls matrix production by interacting with the epsA-O and the tapA-sipW-tasA promoters 23. When SinR binds to its antagonist proteins (SinI and SlrR), repression is alleviated from these operons and biofilm formation can proceed24,25.
B. subtilis has several modes of active motility, two of which, swimming and swarming, are driven by the action of rotating flagella. Importantly, it has been shown that flagella-driven motility and biofilm phenotypes are bistable: cells can only express genes for motility or biofilm formation but not both at one time 26,27. Bi-stability allows for the emergence of phenotypic heterogeneity within a population of genetically identical cells. 28. This genetic bet-hedging provides a contingency for the community if and when environmental conditions change from their current state28,29.
In this work we report on the observation of multiple travelling fluid fronts that develop during the early stage of B. subtilis colony biofilm formation. We find the emergence of a highly motile population of bacteria that is facilitated by the extraction of fluid from the underlying agar substrate. Motility develops behind a moving front of fluid that propagates from the boundary of the colony towards the interior, and the extent of proliferation is modulated by a specific biofilm matrix component, the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS). We trace the origin of this moving front of fluid to the production of the polymer poly-γ-glutamic acid (PGA). We find the influx of fluid is dependent upon both bacterial density and environmental temperature. The temperature dependent production of PGA and the concomitant extraction of fluid can significantly impact the mature biofilm morphology, which diverges from the typical structure associated with B. subtilis NCIB 3610. Our results suggest that B. subtilis has the ability to produce an alternative extracellular matrix in response to adverse environmental conditions.
Results
Deposition and imaging of growing biofilms
At the beginning of each experiment, a 3 μL suspension of B. subtilis cells (OD600 = 1) are deposited onto MSgg agar, a biofilm-promoting minimal media 30. After inoc-ulation the droplet evaporates, which results in a ‘coffee ring’ deposition pattern: a higher density ring of bacteria accumulates at the edge of the initial droplet while the interior is more sparsely populated (Fig. 1A). This is caused by the differential rate of evaporation across the droplet; fluid evaporates more rapidly from the edge relative to the interior. This process drives capillary flows that transport bacteria from the interior to the boundary between the droplet and solid agar 31. Our initial experiments were performed using the wild-type isolate NCIB 3610 that was allowed to grow at 38°C while time-resolved images were collected. The images were captured by imaging through the agar substrate and we monitor the dynamics of growth on the underside of the biofilm (Fig. 1A). We acquired images for the initial 6 hours of growth. Ex-amples of images taken in this manner are seen in Fig. 1B-D. Here, the high density ‘coffee ring’ region is clearly identifiable by the large accumulation of bacteria near the outer boundary of the colony (Fig. 1B). This high density region of bacteria often appears to be multi-layered with a width typically ranging from 75-100 μm.
Emergence of a fluid flux that induces motility within the early biofilm
After this initial time we observe a zone, emerging from the high density region, that is visually different to the interior of the colony (c.f. the dark annulus at the edge compared to the lighter interior, Fig. 1C). This zone grows and concurrently moves inwards as a travelling front towards the interior of the colony (Movie S1). Upon closer inspection of the travelling front we observe a highly dense and motile population of bacteria. The motile cells in this confined region clearly exhibit coherent patterns of self-organised motion such as swirls and vortices, reminiscent of structures observed in active turbulent systems (Movie S2) 32,33. This behaviour implies that the cells are now in a fluid environment. The motility continues as this fluid zone grows, after which the motion rapidly stops (Fig. 1C) after travelling a distance of 400 μm (Fig. 1D). This cessation of motility often also occurs as a propagating front, albeit travelling much faster than the initial propagation of motility (Movie S1, Movie S3) and predominantly moving from the interior of the colony back towards the coffee ring. Taken together, we infer that this moving front of motile cells represents a fluid flux into the biofilm.
Next, we added 2 μm fluorescent beads to the suspension of bacteria that were deposited at the beginning of the experiment (Fig. 1E). Tracking the motion of the beads revealed that the beads coincident with the frontal zone are pushed along at a constant speed of 2.5μm min−1 (Fig. 1F). Thus, the motion of this front has the ability to displace and mechanically push beads, but also cells, towards the center of the colony. A considerable portion of the beads remains embedded within the bacterial mass, but some become erratic in their movement. Our interpretation of this behaviour is that these beads are set in motion by the swimming action of the bacteria in a fluid environment. Interestingly, when we look at bead movement across the entire diameter of a colony, we also observe beads that move outwards radially from localized regions and this occurs simultaneously with the bead movement we see at the biofilm edge (Movie S4). Taking all data together, we infer that this moving front represents a fluid flux into the biofilm, and its emergence depends upon a high cell density.
Extracellular polysaccharide production controls the spatial extent of the fluid flux
Since we observe the formation of a fluid annulus at the outer edge of the biofilm, this led us to investigate if the extracellular matrix controls and modulates the extent of the fluid flux. We hypothesise that the formation of an annulus is a result of extracellular matrix production within the central region of the biofilm that prevents further incursion of fluid. We performed the same experiment described in Fig. 1A using a strain that possesses a deletion of sinR, a key repressor of biofilm formation. Without sinR, the cells over-produce the extracellular matrix and the colony biofilm occupies a smaller footprint and is highly wrinkled (Fig. S1)23. In this case, we posit that the fluid annulus should be more confined if the matrix impacts the spatial extent of fluid flow into the biofilm. We measured the maximum distance that the fluid encroached into the interior of the biofilm relative to the outer edge of the colony (Fig. S2, Movie S5). We found that the distance the fluid travelled in the sinR strain was approximately 3 times less, on average, than the wild-type 3610 strain (Fig. 2). We conclude that extracellular matrix production can modulate the spatial extent of the fluid flux into the biofilm.
Next, we wished to determine if one or more individual components of the matrix were important in controlling the fluid flux. We performed analogous experiments on strains that possessed gene deletions for BslA (bslA), TasA (tasA), and EPS (epsA-O), respectively and we again measured the distance of fluid travel. We found that the tasA and bslA strains were similar to the wild-type strain, albeit the fluid flux in the tasA strain was slightly less than the wild-type and bslA strains (Fig. 2, Fig. S2). In contrast, the strain that produced the greatest difference in behaviour compared to NCIB 3610 was the strain that does not produce EPS. In this strain, as the fluid propagates inwards it is not confined to an annulus but moves to the very center of the colony as evidenced by the very large fluid travel distance (Fig. 2, Movies S1, S6, S7). This fluid coverage resulted in motile cells being visible across the entirety of the colony. Again, the motility was highly dynamic and we observed vortex formation characteristic of active turbulence (Movie S6). The motility arrest front is even more apparent in this strain and, like the fluid propagation front, travels across the entirety of the colony (Movie S1, S7, S8). While the tasA and bslA strains showed very similar dynamics to the wild-type in the first 6-8 hours, the mature biofilms of these matrix mutants resulted in smaller and more unstructured colonies compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. S1). Additionally, the epsA-O mature biofilms were similarly small and morphologically unstructured (Fig. S1) implying under these conditions, the initial fluid flux does not drastically perturb the colony morphology, and matrix production is the important driver in determining mature biofilm structure. Taken together our data demonstrate that the EPS is the determinant that controls the degree by which the fluid flux invades the biofilm.
Whole biofilm imaging of epsA-O strain
The pronounced fluid expansion and motility in the epsA-O strain allowed us to track the flux of fluid across the entirety of the biofilm in a time-resolved manner to learn more about the fluid extraction process. We noticed a finger-like instability develops as the fluid propagates inwards (Fig. 3A; Movies S7,S8). As the fluid pushes in towards the center of the colony the fluid front becomes unstable, forming increasingly large fingers over time (Fig. 3A,B). Such finger-like instabilities are well established in fluid dynamics. A well-known example is the Saffman-Taylor instability (also known as viscous fingering) that occurs when an unstable interface develops between a less viscous fluid displacing a fluid of higher viscosity34. Another way in which fingering morphologies can develop is through gradients in surface tension: Marangoni flows are induced when a fluid with lower surface tension flows towards regions of higher surface tension. Under appropriate conditions, a finger-like morphology can develop when an aqueous surfactant solution spreads on a thin-film of water 35,36.
Imaging the biofilms in this manner also allowed us to fully track three key features of the dynamics: (1) the distance travelled by the expanding outer edge of the colony, (2) the distance travelled by the fluid flux, and (3) the motility arrest front. All measurements were taken relative to the initial position of each feature. Additionally, the relative distances were normalized by their maximum value to allow comparison of their temporal evolution (Fig. 3B). Initially, there is a lag time before the outer edge of the colony begins to expand at a constant rate beyond the initial deposition position. We find that the outer edge growth slows down and plateaus at precisely the time that we see the fluid front begin to propagate. Moreover, the onset of the arrest front propagation directly coincides with the resumption of growth at the outer edge of the biofilm.
Polyglutamic acid is the agent that induces the fluid flux into the biofilm
We wished to identify the molecule responsible for driving the fluid flux and subsequent motility and growth dynamics. Surfactin is a lipopeptide produced by B. subtilis that is a powerful biosurfactant 37 and a potent anti-microbial agent 38. Extracellular surfactin aids swarming and surface motility by lowering the surface tension of the fluid film and increasing the wettability of the substrate 39,40, as well as acting as a ‘one-way’ signalling molecule that induces the activation of extracellular matrix genes 41. Surfactin production in B. subtilis biofilms facilitates colony spreading 40 and is important in the osmotic extraction of fluid from the underlying agar substrate 42. Given these properties, we tested whether surfactin was the causative agent of the dynamics we observe. We used the srfAA and srfAA epsA-O deletion strains to compare the dynamics in both wild-type and EPS deficient backgrounds when surfactin could not be made. As a diagnostic for potential differences between the strains we again measure the relative displacement of the biofilm edge as a function of time. If the interior of the growing biofilm becomes fluidized we should see a plateau in the displacement curve as we saw in Fig. 3C. We found that when we measured the outer edge displacement for biofilms possessing these mutations, they both exhibited the characteristic ‘fluidization plateau’ (Fig. 4A). These data indicate that the srfA and srfA epsA-O strains did not abolish the fluid flux into the colony and led us to conclude that surfactin is not the causative agent of the fluid extraction.
Poly-γ-glutamic acid is a naturally occurring biopolymer consisting of repeating units of L-glutamic acid, D-glutamic acid or both, and is primarily produced by species of Bacillus 43,44. PGA is another potential candidate due to its humectant properties 45,46 and its density dependent production 47. To test whether PGA was responsible for the fluid extraction and the characteristic growth curves, we produced two deletion strains that targeted pgsB, the gene encoding the essential synthetase required for PGA production48. One strain possessed a deletion of pgsB, while the other possessed a deletion of the gene pgsB in the epsA-O background. Again, we measured the edge displacement simultaneously for the wild-type, epsA-O, pgsB, and pgsB epsA-O strains. We observe a plateau in the edge displacement for the wild-type and epsA-O strains while we observe no change in the displacement rate after the lag time for the pgsB mutants (Fig. 4A). We also imaged the biofilm morphology after 48 hours of incubation and found that the wild-type and pgsB mutant were morphologically similar (Figs. 4B,C), and different to the strains unable to produce EPS which were like-wise comparable (Figs. 4E,F). For completeness, we also imaged the surfactin mutant biofilms and found that the srfA strain was structured but occupied a small footprint while the double srfA pgsB mutant was less structured, similar to the other non-EPS producing strains (Figs. 4D,G). We therefore conclude that PGA is the molecular agent that extracts fluid from the substrate and drives the dynamics that we have thus far described. Moreover, the initial fluid flux into the biofilm does not appreciably alter the morphology, and matrix production still governs the structural phenotypes of the colonies.
PGA expression is correlated with high temperature conditions
The discovery that PGA was involved in biofilm formation was unexpected, as while PGA has a role in biofilm formation in several isolates of B. subtilis 49 it had previously been excluded as a matrix molecule for NCIB 361050. Its absence was reported to have no impact on colony biofilm structure47,50. We wanted to reconcile these divergent observations. We noted that our analysis was performed at 38°C while most other studies investigating B. subtilis biofilm formation are conducted at temperatures ranging from room temperature up to 30°C. We therefore hypothesised that PGA production is temperature-dependent. First, we repeated the experiments with wild-type, epsA-O, pgsB, and pgsB epsA-O strains at the additional temperatures of 30°C and 42°C (the highest temperature achievable in our microscopy incubator). At 30°C we did not observe any fluid flow into the colony (i.e. no front development and motility). Likewise, there was no characteristic plateau in the edge displacement curve for all strains, even the wild-type and epsA-O strains (Fig. 5A). This result implies that PGA is not produced at 30°C. At the higher temperatures of 38°C, and 42°C we do find a plateau in the edge displacement curves for the strains able to produce PGA, while no plateau is observed for the PGA deficient mutants (Fig. 4A and Fig. 5B).
Second, NCIB 3610 was found to form exceedingly mucoid colonies on MSgg agar plates at 50°C (Fig. 5G) that were amorphous and highly extended in shape and size. This further supports the idea that PGA production is temperature-dependent. The mucosity was at a level such that when the petri dish plate was inverted the biomass dropped onto the lid. We observed similar phenotypes for colonies unable to produce EPS and surfactin (Fig. 5H, Fig. S3). We also found the mucoid phenotype was directly linked with PGA production as, contrary to the NCIB 3610 parental strain, the pgsB deletion strains were entirely non-mucoid (Fig. 5I,J). We noted the pgsB strain appeared to develop cell flares extending from the edge of the initial colony biofilm footprint, which would be consistent with secondary mutations evolving.
When the same strains were examined at 30°C, no difference in the structure of the NCIB 3610 and pgsB colony biofilm architecture was observed (Fig. 5C,E), consistent with previous reports 47,50. Similarly, both the epsA-O and pgsB epsA-O mutants are morphologically comparable (Fig. 5D,F). This, in conjunction with results presented in Fig. 4B-G, implies that the determining factor for colony morphology at low to intermediate temperature conditions is the EPS component of the biofilm matrix. Conversely, at high temperatures, PGA dominates as the extracellular component that controls biofilm structure. We found that the matrix mutants containing deletions in bslA, tasA, and epsA-O formed similarly mucoid biofilms at 50°C (Fig. S3). Only the mutant possessing a deletion in sinR, while still mucoid, produced a biofilm with rugose structural features (Fig. S3). Collectively these data support the conclusion that PGA is produced in NCIB 3610 in both a density- and temperature-dependent manner and shows that biofilm architecture and structure can be dramatically influenced by the production of PGA.
Discussion
PGA production and motility
In this work we have shown that B. subtilis produces PGA that, due to its humectant properties, induces a fluid flux into a growing colony. This up-welling of fluid induces cell motility that, in these high density and confined conditions, results in turbulent dynamics. It has been well established that motile and biofilm matrix-producing cell states are mutually exclusive 26,28; any individual cell can be one but not both. It has also been demonstrated for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species that active flagellated motility is often required for biofilm development and the role it plays is multi-fold 51–53,53–56. It has been shown that the presence of motile cells can dramatically influence the rate of colony expansion when motile and non-motile cells are co-cultured 57. Turbulent fluid flows generated by flagella-driven motility can drastically affect nutrient mixing 58, transport of passive ‘cargo’ 59, and may influence the formation of B. subtilis pellicle biofilms 60. It is not yet clear what function PGA-induced motility may play in B. subtilis biofilm development. However, it is intriguing that that the same transcriptional regulators required for motility61 are also necessary for PGA synthesis47,62,63. In our experiments we observe motility in the same spatial location where fluid influx and, by inference, PGA production occurs. Whether the motility we observe is simply a by-product of being in a fluid environment, or whether there is a direct evolutionary and functional link between PGA production and motility is still an outstanding question.
From our experiments it is clear that high temperatures induce the colony to withdraw a considerable volume of fluid from the agar substrate. Previous work has shown that PGA can confer protection to bacteria and increase survival under many different environmental stresses64–67. It is plausible that when a biofilm is subject to temperature stress, an over-production of PGA into the extracellular environment would both scavenge and retain moisture which otherwise may be lost through evaporation, thus preventing desiccation of the colony. Additionally, a potential advantage of PGA production in a changing environment would be the possibility of active or passive spreading, to escape and search for more suitable environs to colonize.
Spatial heterogeneity in matrix production
Our experiments at intermediate temperatures (38°C) are suggestive of spatial structuring between PGA-producing cells at the edge of the colony biofilm, and matrix-producing cells in the middle (as has previously been reported 68), resulting in the annular confinement of fluid. Such spatial and temporal heterogeneity is a common feature in biofilms where the local microenvironment can strongly influence the phe-notypic state of the cells. Phenotypic heterogeneity within a biofilm can be generated from variations in the chemical or physical environment 69,70, genotypic variations, and stochastic gene expression 69.
The heterogeneity in cell density imposed by the initial deposition conditions - and the formation of the ‘coffee ring’ - leads to the spatial pattern of fluid extraction that we observe. However, this is not the only means of generating density differences within a biofilm. Aggregates formed while growing in liquid culture can seed patches of higher cell density across the deposition footprint. Indeed, our results show that fluid invasion and, by inference, PGA production can occur in very local regions far away from the ‘coffee ring’ (Movie S4). This suggests that there is some critical density that determines whether a cell adopts a PGA producing state over a matrix-producing one. The spatial heterogeneity is transient at 38°C, and EPS becomes the dominant matrix component that determines the large-scale biofilm morphology. The fluid flux is ultimately stopped by the production of the EPS element of the matrix in the middle region of the biofilm (Fig. 6B). The motile cells that are close to the EPS-producing cells appear to stop moving, and a solid front advances from the middle of the colony outwards. One mechanism that could explain this abrupt transition involves the engagement of the “molecular clutch” EpsE, which binds to FliG and leads to motility arrest 71. However, we may rule this scenario out since we observe the propagation of the motility arrest front in the epsA-O strain. It remains an open question of what physical or biological mechanism governs this phenomenon.
Temperature dependent heterogeneity in matrix production
At low temperatures we did not observe the phenotypic heterogeneity that we observe at intermediate temperatures, presumably due to a lack of PGA production (Fig. 6A) despite the high cell density in the coffee ring. At high temperatures, biofilms are extraordinarily mucoid and lack any discernible structure typical of a B. subtilis biofilm (Fig. 6C). In either extreme, the local heterogeneities seem to matter little and density-dependent PGA production is superseded by a temperature-dependent pathway which impacts the entire biofilm.
When engineered to overproduce the TasA fibres and exopolysaccharide, by introduction of a mutation in sinR, the biofilms formed at high temperature (Fig. S3), were highly mucoid but also possessed structuring more typical of a wild-type B. subtilis biofilm. This implies that production of PGA can occur simultaneously with EPS/TasA, even if individual cells in the population commit to production of one or other product. This is also readily apparent at intermediate temperatures, where we infer that the two cell types have derived from the same population and are clearly present at the same time, albeit spatially separated.
Previous work has shown that strains possessing a deletion of spo0A result in biofilms that are mucoid and unstructured at low temperatures (30°C) and that this was due to PGA production30,49. Therefore, a spo0A mutant broadly mimics the wild-type biofilm phenotype that we observe under high temperature conditions. This implies that Spo0A may be the regulatory component that controls temperature dependent production of a PGA-rich or EPS/TasA-rich biofilm matrix.
Taken together, these results imply that B. subtilis has the ability to adapt different biofilm matrices with distinct properties to fit disparate environmental conditions. It is plausible that such a strategy is employed in natural environments as B. subtilis can grow at a wide range of temperatures: it is found in desert soils and within composts which can easily reach temperatures of 50°C. Until now, PGA was not thought to be an important factor as a matrix component in B. subtilis biofilms 47. However, it appears, under the right conditions, PGA can become an alternative matrix component with distinct structural and physical characteristics that may aid the biofilm to survive in high temperature conditions.
Physical Consequences of PGA Production
The biofilm matrix of B. subtilis and V. cholerae has been modelled as a viscous hydrogel network that facilitates biofilm expansion via osmotic fluid influx 72–75. The localization of EPS production at the propagating boundary of a growing colony is thought to drive the outward expansion of the biofilm. Concomitant production of osmolytes stimulates fluid extraction that swells the matrix at the growing boundary, driving motion forward. In our experiments, PGA seems to have the opposite effect: colony expansion stalls due to the colony entering a ‘liquid-like’ state when fluid is extracted from the substrate. Previous work has shown that colony biofilm expansion is strongly governed by mechanical contact forces between neighboring cells and friction with the underlying substrate 57,76,77. In our experiments, expansion only recommences when the fluid environment dissipates, physical contacts are restored, and non-PGA matrix production begins. A question that remains is: how does colony expansion occur when PGA is the primary matrix component? Our experiments at high temperatures do show that the wild-type 3610 strain expands significantly beyond the initial deposition footprint. Strains that do not produce EPS or surfactin do not expand as much as the wild-type and this may hint that these components may still have a role to play in facilitating colony expansion (Fig. S3).
The traveling waves of fluid in the epsA-O deficient strain resulted in the appearance of finger-like structures as the wave propagated inwards. Such fingering instabilities can occur when a low viscosity fluid displaces one of a higher viscosity; the inverse situation will typically result in a stable interface. Curiously in our experiments, the fingers that we observe occur in the inverse configuration. Such inverse Saffman-Taylor instabilities can occur when there are wettable particles present that can adsorb to the air/fluid interface. This adsorption, due to interfacial energy minimization, can induce interfacial instabilities78. It is known that bacteria can accumulate at interfaces79, and B. subtilis can form floating biofilms at air/water interfaces. It is possible that bacteria coat and accumulate at the front of the incoming fluid wave, thus modifying the interfacial energetics and destabilising the interface between the fluid and the air at the interior of the colony. More work will need to be done to uncover the biological and physical mechanisms that cause this unusual phenomena and the possible benefit or function in ecological settings.
Materials & Methods
Growth conditions
B. subtilis strains were initially grown in LB medium (10 g NaCl, 5 g yeast extract, and 10 g tryptone per liter). Biofilms were grown on MSgg agar (5 mM potassium phosphate and 100 mM MOPs at pH 7.0 supplemented with 2 mM MgCl2, 700 μM CaCl2, 50 μM MnCl2, 50 μM FeCl3, 1 μM ZnCl2, 2 μM thiamine, 0.5% v/v glycerol, 0.5% w/v glutamate, 1.5% w/v Select Agar (Invitrogen). When appropriate, antibiotics were used as required at the following concentrations: chloramphenicol at 5μg ml−1, kanamycin at 25 μg ml−1, spectinomycin at 100 μg ml−1, and tetracycline at 10 μg ml−1.
Strain Construction
All strains used in this study are provided in Table S1. All B. subtilis strains used in this work are derived from the wild-type laboratory isolate NCIB 3610 and constructed using standard protocols. SPP1 phage transduction was used for transfer of genomic DNA from the donor strain into the recipient NCIB 3610, as described previously80.
Biofilm Imaging and Analysis
B. subtilis strains were inoculated into 3 mL LB from a single colony grown on 1.5% w/v LB agar. The bacteria were allowed to grow at 30°C with 200 rpm orbital shaking until reaching an OD between 1.5-2. The cell culture was diluted to OD 1.0 in phosphate-buffered saline. A 3 μL droplet of bacteria was deposited onto a 35 mm petri dish (Corning) containing MSgg agar. The droplets of bacteria were allowed to dry for 10 minutes. After drying, the petri dish was placed on a Nikon Ti inverted microscope that is temperature controlled. All microscopy images and movies were captured using a CoolSNAP HQ2 CCD camera controlled by μManager software. Brightfield movies and images of the biofilms were captured from the underside of the petri dish and are imaged through the agar. For the bead tracking experiments, 1 μm diameter latex carboxylate-modified polystyrene yellow fluorescent beads (Sigma-Aldrich) were diluted into PBS from the stock solution in a 1:1000 ratio. 1 μL of the working solution was added to the 1 mL of the diluted cell culture just prior to deposition. Movies were acquired in bright and epifluorescent channels (Nikon GFP fluorescent filter cube) and the beads were tracked using the ImageJ plugin TrackMate (v3.8.0)81. All image anal-ysis was performed using the Fiji distribution of ImageJ. Whole biofilm microscopy images were captured as above but in multiple tiles that were stitched together using the ‘Pairwise Stitching’ plug-in. The images of the fingering instabilities were generated by first using the ‘straighten’ tool to transform a circular to a linear region. The default ImageJ threshold method was applied to binarize the images. In cases where the intensity varied across the image, the image was partitioned into regions of similar intensity and then thresholding was performed. The ‘edge finding’ tool was used to locate the edges of the thresholded images. After edges were identified the interior was filled to form a representation of the fingers. If the image was partitioned, the image was stitched together using the stitching tool in ImageJ. Measurement of fluid travel distance was manually tracked in ImageJ and the mean displacement was averaged over 10 separate measurements for each experiment. For each strain studied, three separate experiments were performed. Edge and front displacement measurements were similarly performed in ImageJ by manually tracking the movement of the front over successive frames. Displacements were always measured relative to the initial position of each feature. Images of whole biofilms were obtained using a Leica MZ16 stereoscope as described previously 17.
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Porter and F. Davidson for their helpful comments. Work in the NSW and CEM laboratories is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/P001335/1, BB/R012415/1].
Footnotes
Discussion is updated where we posited that the motility arrest front we observe may be due to the flagellar clutch EpsE. We clarify that this possibility is ruled out by our experiments.
References
- [1].↵
- [2].↵
- [3].↵
- [4].↵
- [5].↵
- [6].↵
- [7].↵
- [8].↵
- [9].
- [10].↵
- [11].↵
- [12].
- [13].
- [14].↵
- [15].↵
- [16].↵
- [17].↵
- [18].
- [19].↵
- [20].↵
- [21].↵
- [22].↵
- [23].↵
- [24].↵
- [25].↵
- [26].↵
- [27].↵
- [28].↵
- [29].↵
- [30].↵
- [31].↵
- [32].↵
- [33].↵
- [34].↵
- [35].↵
- [36].↵
- [37].↵
- [38].↵
- [39].↵
- [40].↵
- [41].↵
- [42].↵
- [43].↵
- [44].↵
- [45].↵
- [46].↵
- [47].↵
- [48].↵
- [49].↵
- [50].↵
- [51].↵
- [52].
- [53].↵
- [54].
- [55].
- [56].↵
- [57].↵
- [58].↵
- [59].↵
- [60].↵
- [61].↵
- [62].↵
- [63].↵
- [64].↵
- [65].
- [66].
- [67].↵
- [68].↵
- [69].↵
- [70].↵
- [71].↵
- [72].↵
- [73].
- [74].
- [75].↵
- [76].↵
- [77].↵
- [78].↵
- [79].↵
- [80].↵
- [81].↵