Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A Simple Method for Getting Standard Error on the Ratiometric Calcium Estimator

View ORCID ProfileSimon Hess, View ORCID ProfileChristophe Pouzat, View ORCID ProfilePeter Kloppenburg
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.424015
Simon Hess
1Institute for Zoology, Biocenter and Cologne Excellence Cluster in Aging Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon Hess
Christophe Pouzat
2IRMA, Strasbourg University and CNRS UMR 7501, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christophe Pouzat
  • For correspondence: christophe.pouzat@math.unistra.fr
Peter Kloppenburg
1Institute for Zoology, Biocenter and Cologne Excellence Cluster in Aging Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Kloppenburg
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1. Abstract

The ratiometric fluorescent calcium indicator Fura-2 plays a fundamental role in the investigation of cellular calcium dynamics. Despite of its widespread use in the last 30 years, only one publication [2] proposed a way of obtaining confidence intervals on fitted calcium dynamic model parameters from single ’calcium transients’. Shortcomings of this approach are its requirement for a ’3 wavelengths’ protocol (excitation at 340 and 380 nm as usual plus at 360 nm, the isosbectic point) as well as the need for an autofluorence / background fluorescence model at each wavelength. We propose here a simpler method that eliminates both shortcommings:

  1. a precise estimation of the standard errors of the raw data is obtained first,

  2. the standard error of the ratiometric calcium estimator (a function of the raw data values) is derived using both the propagation of uncertainty and a Monte-Carlo method.

Once meaningful standard errors for calcium estimates are available, standard errors on fitted model parameters follow directly from the use of nonlinear least-squares optimization algorithms.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

How to get error bars on the ratiometric calcium estimator? The figure is to be read clockwise from the bottom right corner. The two measurements areas (region of interest, ROI, on the cell body and background measurement region, BMR, outside of the cell) are displayed on the frame corresponding to one actual experiment. Two measurements, one following an excitation at 340 nm and the other following an excitation at 380 nm are performed (at each ’time point’) from each region. The result is a set of four measures: adu340 (from the ROI), adu340B (from the BMR), adu380 and adu380B. These measurements are modeled as realizations of Gaussian random variables. The fact that the measurements as well as the subsequent quantities derived from them are random variable realization is conveyed throughout the figure by the use of Gaussian probability densities. The densities from the MRB are ’tighter’ because there are much more pixels in the MRB than in the ROI (the standard deviations of the densities shown on this figure have been enlarged for clarity, but their relative size has been preserved, the horizontal axis in black always starts at 0). The key result of the paper is that the standard deviation of the four Gaussian densities corresponding to the raw data (bottom of the figure) can be reliably estimated from the data alone, Embedded Image, where V is the product of the CCD chip gain squared by the number of pixels in the ROI by the CCD chip readout variance. The algebric operations leading to the estimator (top right) are explicitely displayed. The paper explains how to compute the standard deviation of the derived distributions obtained at each step of the calcium concentration estimation.

Method name Standard error for the ratiometric calcium estimator

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://gitlab.com/c_pouzat/getting-se-on-ratiometric-ca-estimator

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 23, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Simple Method for Getting Standard Error on the Ratiometric Calcium Estimator
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Simple Method for Getting Standard Error on the Ratiometric Calcium Estimator
Simon Hess, Christophe Pouzat, Peter Kloppenburg
bioRxiv 2020.12.22.424015; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.424015
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Simple Method for Getting Standard Error on the Ratiometric Calcium Estimator
Simon Hess, Christophe Pouzat, Peter Kloppenburg
bioRxiv 2020.12.22.424015; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.424015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3686)
  • Biochemistry (7781)
  • Bioengineering (5672)
  • Bioinformatics (21253)
  • Biophysics (10565)
  • Cancer Biology (8165)
  • Cell Biology (11916)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6744)
  • Ecology (10391)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13847)
  • Genetics (9698)
  • Genomics (13060)
  • Immunology (8131)
  • Microbiology (19973)
  • Molecular Biology (7839)
  • Neuroscience (42997)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1276)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2257)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7217)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1309)
  • Synthetic Biology (2000)
  • Systems Biology (5529)
  • Zoology (1126)