Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Heterologous autoimmunity and prokaryotic immune defense

View ORCID ProfileHanrong Chen, View ORCID ProfileAndreas Mayer, Vijay Balasubramanian
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.425308
Hanrong Chen
1Computational & Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
2David Rittenhouse Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hanrong Chen
Andreas Mayer
3Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andreas Mayer
  • For correspondence: am66@princeton.edu
Vijay Balasubramanian
2David Rittenhouse Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, USA
4Theoretische Natuurkunde, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Some prokaryotes possess CRISPR-Cas systems that provide adaptive immunity to viruses guided by DNA segments called spacers acquired from invading phage. However, the patchy incidence and limited memory breadth of CRISPR-Cas systems suggest that their fitness benefits are offset by costs. Here, we propose that cross-reactive CRISPR targeting can lead to heterologous autoimmunity, whereby foreign spacers guide self-targeting in a spacer-length dependent fashion. Balancing antiviral defense against autoimmunity predicts a scaling relation between spacer length and CRISPR repertoire size. We find evidence for this scaling through comparative analysis of sequenced prokaryotic genomes, and show that this association also holds at the level of CRISPR types. In contrast, the scaling is absent in strains with nonfunctional CRISPR loci. Finally, we demonstrate that stochastic spacer loss can explain variations around the scaling relation, even between strains of the same species. Our results suggest that heterologous autoimmunity is a selective factor shaping the evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Revised manuscript with clarifications to the text and additional robustness checks. Highlights: - derivation of optimal repertoire size in an explicit model of defense benefits and autoimmunity costs (Appendix A) - more rigorous statistical tests and additional filtering to reduce potential phylogenetic biases - bioinformatic assessment of how matching probabilities increase due to shared sequence biases (Appendix C)

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 04, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Heterologous autoimmunity and prokaryotic immune defense
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Heterologous autoimmunity and prokaryotic immune defense
Hanrong Chen, Andreas Mayer, Vijay Balasubramanian
bioRxiv 2021.01.04.425308; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.425308
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Heterologous autoimmunity and prokaryotic immune defense
Hanrong Chen, Andreas Mayer, Vijay Balasubramanian
bioRxiv 2021.01.04.425308; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.425308

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biophysics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4687)
  • Biochemistry (10371)
  • Bioengineering (7689)
  • Bioinformatics (26358)
  • Biophysics (13544)
  • Cancer Biology (10713)
  • Cell Biology (15452)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8508)
  • Ecology (12831)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16877)
  • Genetics (11407)
  • Genomics (15489)
  • Immunology (10632)
  • Microbiology (25242)
  • Molecular Biology (10233)
  • Neuroscience (54565)
  • Paleontology (402)
  • Pathology (1670)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2898)
  • Physiology (4350)
  • Plant Biology (9263)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1587)
  • Synthetic Biology (2558)
  • Systems Biology (6786)
  • Zoology (1470)