1. Abstract
Sex differences in immunity have been described in humans and other mammal species. Females have a lower incidence of infections and non-reproductive malignancies and exhibit higher antibody levels after vaccination. Existing evolutionary explanations are based on differences in reproductive strategies and reaction to extrinsic differences in susceptibility and virulence between the sexes. Here, we test the hypothesis that known differences in the probability of transmission and outcome of sexually transmitted infections contribute to sex differences in immunocompetence. We modelled reproductive and immune investments against a fertility limiting Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI). We show that, in line with previous findings, increased susceptibility selects for tolerance to the parasite while increased virulence selects for resistance against it. Differences in reproductive strategies between the sexes lead to sex differences in immunocompetence, mostly with higher competence in females. Extrinsic differences in susceptibility and virulence between the sexes can augment or alleviate the evolutionary consequences of intrinsic differences depending on their direction and magnitude. This indicates that the selection of sex-specific immune strategies is less predictable than thought before and explains why sex differences in immunity have been found to be not universal and pervasive across animal species.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.