Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control

View ORCID ProfileKatie Willis, View ORCID ProfileAustin Burt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.08.425856
Katie Willis
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katie Willis
  • For correspondence: katie.willis16@imperial.ac.uk
Austin Burt
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Austin Burt
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Synthetic gene drive constructs could, in principle, provide the basis for highly efficient interventions to control disease vectors and other pest species. This efficiency derives in part from leveraging natural processes of dispersal and gene flow to spread the construct and its impacts from one population to another. However, sometimes (for example, with invasive species) only specific populations are in need of control, and impacts on non-target populations would be undesirable. Many gene drive designs use nucleases that recognise and cleave specific genomic sequences, and one way to restrict their spread would be to exploit sequence differences between target and non-target populations. In this paper we propose and model a series of low threshold double drive designs for population suppression, each consisting of two constructs, one imposing a reproductive load on the population and the other inserted into a differentiated locus and controlling the drive of the first. Simple deterministic, discrete-generation computer simulations are used to assess the alternative designs. We find that the simplest double drive designs are significantly more robust to pre-existing cleavage resistance at the differentiated locus than single drive designs, and that more complex designs incorporating sex ratio distortion can be more efficient still, even allowing for successful control when the differentiated locus is neutral and there is up to 50% pre-existing resistance in the target population. Similar designs can also be used for population replacement, with similar benefits. A population genomic analysis of PAM sites in island and mainland populations of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae indicates that the differentiation needed for our methods to work can exist in nature. Double drives should be considered when efficient but localised population genetic control is needed and there is some genetic differentiation between target and non-target populations.

Author summary Some disease vectors, invasive species, and other pests cannot be satisfactorily controlled with existing interventions, and new methods are required. Synthetic gene drive systems that are able to spread though populations because they are inherited at a greater-than-Mendelian rate have the potential to form the basis for new, highly efficient pest control measures. The most efficient such strategies use natural gene flow to spread a construct throughout a species’ range, but if control is only desired in a particular location then these approaches may not be appropriate. As some of the most promising gene drive designs use nucleases to target specific DNA sequences, it ought to be possible to exploit sequence differences between target and non-target populations to restrict the spread and impact of a gene drive. In this paper we propose using two-construct “double drive” designs that exploit pre-existing sequence differences between target and non-target populations. Our approaches maintain the efficiencies associated with only small release rates being needed and can work if the differentiated locus is selectively neutral and if the differentiation is far from complete, and therefore expand the range of options to be considered in developing genetic approaches to control pest species.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 09, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control
Katie Willis, Austin Burt
bioRxiv 2021.01.08.425856; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.08.425856
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control
Katie Willis, Austin Burt
bioRxiv 2021.01.08.425856; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.08.425856

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Synthetic Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4119)
  • Biochemistry (8828)
  • Bioengineering (6532)
  • Bioinformatics (23484)
  • Biophysics (11804)
  • Cancer Biology (9223)
  • Cell Biology (13336)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7442)
  • Ecology (11425)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15173)
  • Genetics (10452)
  • Genomics (14056)
  • Immunology (9187)
  • Microbiology (22198)
  • Molecular Biology (8823)
  • Neuroscience (47625)
  • Paleontology (351)
  • Pathology (1431)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2493)
  • Physiology (3736)
  • Plant Biology (8090)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1438)
  • Synthetic Biology (2224)
  • Systems Biology (6042)
  • Zoology (1254)