Abstract
Measuring gene flow between malaria parasite populations in different geographic locations can provide strategic information for malaria control interventions. Multiple important questions pertaining to the design of such studies remain unanswered, limiting efforts to operationalize genomic surveillance tools for routine public health use. This report evaluates numerically the ability to distinguish different levels of gene flow between malaria populations, using different amounts of real and simulated data, where data are simulated using parameters that approximate different epidemiological conditions. Specifically, using Plasmodium falciparum whole genome sequence data and sequence data simulated for a metapopulation with different migration rates and effective population sizes, we compare two estimators of gene flow, explore the number of genetic markers and number of individuals required to reliably rank highly connected locations, and describe how these thresholds change given different effective population sizes and migration rates. Our results have implications for the design and implementation of malaria genomic surveillance efforts.
