Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Why do some primate mothers carry their infant’s corpse? A cross-species comparative study

View ORCID ProfileElisa Fernández-Fueyo, Yukimaru Sugiyama, Takeshi Matsui, View ORCID ProfileAlecia J. Carter
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.12.426348
Elisa Fernández-Fueyo
1Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elisa Fernández-Fueyo
  • For correspondence: elisaf597@gmail.com alecia.carter@ucl.ac.uk
Yukimaru Sugiyama
2Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeshi Matsui
3Takasakiyama Natural Zoo, Oita, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alecia J. Carter
1Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alecia J. Carter
  • For correspondence: elisaf597@gmail.com alecia.carter@ucl.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Non-human primates respond to the death of a conspecific in diverse ways, some which may present phylogenetic continuity with human thanatological behaviours. Of these responses, infant corpse carrying by mothers (ICC) is the most-frequently reported. Despite its prevalence, quantitative analyses of this behaviour are scarce and inconclusive. We compiled a database of 409 published cases across 50 different primate species of mothers’ responses to their infants’ deaths to test hypotheses proposed to explain between- and within-species variation in corpse carrying. Using Bayesian phylogenetic regressions, we preliminarily identified three factors as possible predictors of ICC occurrence. However, using an information-theoretic approach, no combination of these predictors performed better than the null model, offering no support for any of the hypotheses we tested. In contrast, for those cases in which infant corpses were carried, infant age affected ICC duration, with longer ICC observed for younger infants. This result may provide support for hypotheses that suggest that ICC is a by-product of a strong mother-infant bond. The results are discussed in the context of the evolution of emotion and their implications for evolutionary thanatology are considered.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 12, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why do some primate mothers carry their infant’s corpse? A cross-species comparative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Why do some primate mothers carry their infant’s corpse? A cross-species comparative study
Elisa Fernández-Fueyo, Yukimaru Sugiyama, Takeshi Matsui, Alecia J. Carter
bioRxiv 2021.01.12.426348; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.12.426348
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Why do some primate mothers carry their infant’s corpse? A cross-species comparative study
Elisa Fernández-Fueyo, Yukimaru Sugiyama, Takeshi Matsui, Alecia J. Carter
bioRxiv 2021.01.12.426348; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.12.426348

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2430)
  • Biochemistry (4791)
  • Bioengineering (3333)
  • Bioinformatics (14684)
  • Biophysics (6640)
  • Cancer Biology (5172)
  • Cell Biology (7429)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4367)
  • Ecology (6874)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9926)
  • Genetics (7346)
  • Genomics (9533)
  • Immunology (4558)
  • Microbiology (12686)
  • Molecular Biology (4948)
  • Neuroscience (28348)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (809)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1392)
  • Physiology (2024)
  • Plant Biology (4504)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (977)
  • Synthetic Biology (1299)
  • Systems Biology (3917)
  • Zoology (726)