Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Universal markers support a long inter-domain branch between Archaea and Bacteria

Edmund R. R. Moody, Tara A. Mahendrarajah, View ORCID ProfileNina Dombrowski, View ORCID ProfileJames W. Clark, Celine Petitjean, View ORCID ProfilePierre Offre, View ORCID ProfileGergely J. Szollosi, View ORCID ProfileAnja Spang, View ORCID ProfileTom A. Williams
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.19.427276
Edmund R. R. Moody
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara A. Mahendrarajah
2NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry; AB Den Burg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina Dombrowski
2NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry; AB Den Burg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nina Dombrowski
James W. Clark
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James W. Clark
Celine Petitjean
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Offre
2NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry; AB Den Burg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pierre Offre
Gergely J. Szollosi
3Dept. of Biological Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
4MTA-ELTE “Lendület” Evolutionary Genomics Research Group, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
5Evolutionary Systems Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 8237 Tihany, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gergely J. Szollosi
Anja Spang
2NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry; AB Den Burg, The Netherlands
6Department of Cell- and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75123, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anja Spang
Tom A. Williams
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom A. Williams
  • For correspondence: tom.a.williams@bristol.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The tree of life is generally estimated from a core set of 16-56 genes coding for proteins predominantly involved in translation and other conserved informational and cellular processes. These markers represent only a fraction of the genes that were likely present in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), but are useful for deep phylogenetic reconstructions because their mode of inheritance appears to be mainly vertical, which satisfies the assumptions of gene concatenation and supertree methods. Previous phylogenetic analyses of these genes recovered a long branch between Archaea and Bacteria. By contrast, a recent study made use of a greatly expanded set of 381 marker genes and recovered a much shorter branch length between Archaea and Bacteria, comparable to some divergences within the domains. These analyses suggest that the apparent deep split between Archaea and Bacteria may be the result of accelerated evolution of ribosomal genes. Here we re-evaluate the evolutionary history of the expanded marker gene set and show that substitutional saturation, inter-domain gene transfer, hidden paralogy, and poor model fit contribute to the inference of an artificially shortened inter-domain branch. Our results do not exclude a moderately faster rate of ribosomal gene evolution during the divergence of Archaea and Bacteria, but indicate that vertically-evolving marker genes across all functional categories support a major genetic divergence between the two primary domains of life.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Universal markers support a long inter-domain branch between Archaea and Bacteria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Universal markers support a long inter-domain branch between Archaea and Bacteria
Edmund R. R. Moody, Tara A. Mahendrarajah, Nina Dombrowski, James W. Clark, Celine Petitjean, Pierre Offre, Gergely J. Szollosi, Anja Spang, Tom A. Williams
bioRxiv 2021.01.19.427276; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.19.427276
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Universal markers support a long inter-domain branch between Archaea and Bacteria
Edmund R. R. Moody, Tara A. Mahendrarajah, Nina Dombrowski, James W. Clark, Celine Petitjean, Pierre Offre, Gergely J. Szollosi, Anja Spang, Tom A. Williams
bioRxiv 2021.01.19.427276; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.19.427276

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3514)
  • Biochemistry (7367)
  • Bioengineering (5347)
  • Bioinformatics (20326)
  • Biophysics (10046)
  • Cancer Biology (7777)
  • Cell Biology (11353)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6453)
  • Ecology (9980)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13357)
  • Genetics (9373)
  • Genomics (12614)
  • Immunology (7725)
  • Microbiology (19104)
  • Molecular Biology (7465)
  • Neuroscience (41153)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1235)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2142)
  • Physiology (3180)
  • Plant Biology (6880)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1276)
  • Synthetic Biology (1900)
  • Systems Biology (5328)
  • Zoology (1091)