Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Dung beetles as vertebrate samplers – a test of high throughput analysis of dung beetle iDNA

View ORCID ProfileRosie Drinkwater, View ORCID ProfileElizabeth L. Clare, View ORCID ProfileArthur Y. C. Chung, View ORCID ProfileStephen J. Rossiter, View ORCID ProfileEleanor M. Slade
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.10.430568
Rosie Drinkwater
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rosie Drinkwater
  • For correspondence: r.drinkwater@qmul.ac.uk
Elizabeth L. Clare
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elizabeth L. Clare
Arthur Y. C. Chung
2Forest Research Centre, Forestry Department, P.O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arthur Y. C. Chung
Stephen J. Rossiter
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen J. Rossiter
Eleanor M. Slade
3Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK
4Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore City
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eleanor M. Slade
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The application of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling in biodiversity surveys has gained widespread acceptance, especially in aquatic systems where free eDNA can be readily collected by filtering water. In terrestrial systems, eDNA-based approaches for assaying vertebrate biodiversity have tended to rely on blood-feeding invertebrates, including leeches and mosquitoes (termed invertebrate-derived DNA or iDNA). However, a key limitation of using blood-feeding taxa as samplers is that they are difficult to trap, and, in the case of leeches, are highly restricted to humid forest ecosystems. Dung beetles (superfamily Scarabaeoidea) feed on the faecal matter of terrestrial vertebrates and offer several potential benefits over blood-feeding invertebrates as samplers of vertebrate DNA. Importantly, these beetles can be easily captured in large numbers using simple, inexpensive baited traps; are globally distributed; and also occur in a wide range of biomes, allowing mammal diversity to be compared across habitats. In this exploratory study, we test the potential utility of dung beetles as vertebrate samplers by sequencing the mammal DNA contained within their guts. First, using a controlled feeding experiment, we show that mammalian DNA can be retrieved from the guts of large dung beetles (Catharsius renaudpauliani) for up to 10 hours after feeding. Second, by combining high-throughput sequencing of a multi-species assemblage of dung beetles with PCR replicates, we show that multiple mammal taxa can be identified with high confidence. By providing preliminary evidence that dung beetles can be used as a source of mammal DNA, our study highlights the potential for this widespread group to be used in future biodiversity monitoring surveys.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 10, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dung beetles as vertebrate samplers – a test of high throughput analysis of dung beetle iDNA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dung beetles as vertebrate samplers – a test of high throughput analysis of dung beetle iDNA
Rosie Drinkwater, Elizabeth L. Clare, Arthur Y. C. Chung, Stephen J. Rossiter, Eleanor M. Slade
bioRxiv 2021.02.10.430568; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.10.430568
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Dung beetles as vertebrate samplers – a test of high throughput analysis of dung beetle iDNA
Rosie Drinkwater, Elizabeth L. Clare, Arthur Y. C. Chung, Stephen J. Rossiter, Eleanor M. Slade
bioRxiv 2021.02.10.430568; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.10.430568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2635)
  • Biochemistry (5224)
  • Bioengineering (3650)
  • Bioinformatics (15730)
  • Biophysics (7218)
  • Cancer Biology (5597)
  • Cell Biology (8051)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4739)
  • Ecology (7472)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10531)
  • Genetics (7704)
  • Genomics (10090)
  • Immunology (5157)
  • Microbiology (13829)
  • Molecular Biology (5354)
  • Neuroscience (30605)
  • Paleontology (212)
  • Pathology (872)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1520)
  • Physiology (2235)
  • Plant Biology (4987)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1037)
  • Synthetic Biology (1380)
  • Systems Biology (4131)
  • Zoology (804)