ABSTRACT
Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) are under strict control by the host surveillance system but can become awakened under pathological conditions. Among them, the HERVK family, comprised of the evolutionarily youngest HERVs, is able to transcribe viral genes and producing retrovirus-like particles (RVLPs). However, whether HERVK is mobilized in the aging process and contributes to aging-related pathologies is largely unknown. Using diverse senescence models, we show that epigenetic alterations unlock HERVK expression, which leads to the formation of RVLPs. Derepression of HERVK promotes cellular senescence, while inhibiting HERVK prevents cellular senescence. HERVK RVLPs released from senescent cells or aged individuals are capable of conferring a senescence phenotype to young cells. Conversely, using antibodies to block the HERVK RVLPs abrogates their transmissible pro-senescence effect. Moreover, endogenous retrovirus expression is increased in aged human tissues and serum from the elderly. These findings indicate that the activation of endogenous viruses is part of the driving force of aging.
Main Text
Aging progressively leads to physiological decline and manifestations of chronic diseases, yet many of the underlying molecular changes and mechanisms remain poorly understood. Elucidating the basic mechanisms is fundamental for the development of therapeutic interventions to delay aging. With great efforts of last decades, scientists have identified several causal determinants of aging-related molecular changes, such as epigenetic alterations and stimulation of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors (1–7). However, the majority of these studies originated extensively from the protein-coding part of the genome, and much less have been revealed in the non-protein-coding part of the genome. Therefore we turned our attention to retroelements, the “dark matter” of the genome (8), and its uncharted role in aging.
Retroelements, such as long terminal repeat (LTR) and non-LTR retrotransposons, constitute approximately 42% of the human genome (9). Among them, human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), which belong to LTR retrotransposons, are a relic of ancient retroviral infection, fixed in the genome during evolution, comprising about 8% of the human genome (10, 11). Due to the evolutionary pressure, most HERVs became defective as they accumulated inactivating mutations and deletions that prevent their mobilization (10, 12). However, HERVK, the evolutionarily youngest group of HERVs, maintains full-length open reading frames encoding proteins required for viral particle formation, including Gag, Pol, Env, and Pro (11). In most cases, HERVs are transcriptionally silenced by host mechanisms such as epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation and histone modifications (13, 14). However, if it is able to bypass host surveillance, HERVK retroviral elements start to transcribe, retrotranspose, and even produce and release retrovirus-like particles (RVLPs) capable of infecting human cells (15, 16). As aging is associated with changes in the epigenome (3, 17), in this study, we asked whether dormant HERVK might become activated during human aging, whether the mobilization of HERVK is a driving force of aging, and whether it can be a potential therapeutic target to alleviate aging.
Precocious HERVK expression and RVLPs packaging in senescent human cells
Cellular senescence is considered as a major contributing factor to aging (2, 18) and is a hallmark of human progeroid diseases, i.e., Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) and Werner syndrome (WS) (19–24). We previously demonstrated that HGPS human mesenchymal progenitor cells (hMPCs) (LMNAG608G/+ hMPCs) or WS hMPCs (WRN−/− hMPCs) recapitulated premature aging phenotypes (20–25) (Fig.1A). Here, we leverage these premature aging models as well as wild type (WT) replicative senescent (RS) hMPCs (Fig. 1A) to test whether HERVK activation is associated with human cellular senescence.
(A) Left: Schematic diagram of replicative senescent (RS) and premature aging models of hMPCs. Top, WT hMPCs which are replicative senescent in their late passage (LP, P>12); middle and bottom, premature aging HGPS (LMNAG608G/+) and WS (WRN−/−) hMPCs models, respectively, constructed via genome-editing in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) followed by direct differentiation to hMPCs and exhibiting growth arrest at passage 8-9 (referred to LP for premature aging model) (22). Right: Schematic diagram of the HERVK proviral genome structure flanked by human-specific LTR5HS insertions and internal coding protein sequences (HERVK-Int). HERVK retroviral elements are able to transcribe, translate, package into retrovirus-like particles (RVLPs). Gag, group-specific antigen; Pro, protease; Pol, polymerase; Env, envelope. (B) Left: Ring plot showing the composition of shared upregulated repetitive elements (REs) in premature aging and RS hMPCs as categorized in each repetitive element class. REs upregulated in at least three comparisons are taken into consideration. Right: Family enrichment analysis for the shared upregulated REs of LTR class in premature aging and RS hMPCs. (C) Left: Genome browser view of the RNA levels (reads per kilobase of bin per million of reads, RPKM) of HML2 in WT and premature aging hMPCs at early passage (EP, P3) and late passage (LP, P9). Right: Box plot showing quantitative analysis of HML2 expression levels (transcripts per kilobase million, TPM) in RS (WT EP vs. LP) and premature aging hMPCs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (t test). (D) Heatmap showing the levels of HERVK transcripts covering env, pol and gag regions, as well as senescence markers genes in WT, HGPS, and WS hMPCs at EP and LP by RT-qPCR. 4 wells per condition. (E) Left: Representative images of HERVK RNA FISH in WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. Arrows indicate HERVK RNA signals in cytoplasm. Scale bars, 10 μm. Right: Quantification of HERVK RNA-FISH fluorescence intensity. Three independent experimental sets (n > 50 for each set). ***P < 0.001 (t test). (F) Violin plot showing the CpG DNA methylation levels (mCG/CG) for HERVK in RS (WT EP vs. LP) and premature aging hMPCs. The white dots represent the median values, and the white lines represent the values within the interquartile range (IQR) from smallest to largest. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 (t test). (G) ChIP-qPCR assessment of H3K9me3 enrichment of HERVK-LTR5HS regions in WT, HGPS, and WS hMPCs. n = 3, biological samples with 4 wells in each sample. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001 (t test). (H) Left: Z-stack 3D reconstruction of HERVK-Env immunofluorescence staining (shown in Fig. S4A) in WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. Scale bars, 10 μm. Right: Quantification of HERVK-Env fluorescence intensity. Three independent experimental sets (n > 100 for each set). ***P< 0.001 (t test). (I) Left: Western blotting of HERVK-Env, p16INK4a, LAP2β in WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative HERVK-Env expression. n = 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (t test). (J) Left: TEM immune-gold labelling of WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs using HERVK-Env antibody. Regions highlighted by white squares indicate HERVK putative RVLPs labelled with gold particles in cells. Higher magnification of the indicated regions is shown at right. Scale bars, 200 nm (left), 100 nm (right). Dashed lines label the cell membrane. E: Extracellular; I: Intracellular. Right: Statistical analysis of the number of HERVK RVLPs labelled with gold particles per cell. More than 40 cells were quantified in each group. ***P < 0.001 (t test).
To investigate whether retroelements (REs) are actively transcribed during cellular senescence, we performed RNA-seq analysis in WT RS hMPCs and prematurely aged models including HGPS and WS hMPCs (Fig. 1A-B). We found increased expression of several transposable elements in senescent hMPCs, such as LTR, DNA transposons and LINE (Long interspersed nuclear elements, a class of non-LTR) (Fig. 1B). Of these elements, retroelement HERVK-int in ERVK family, was upregulated in both replicative and prematurely aged hMPCs (Fig. 1B). We were particularly interested in HERVK, as it is the only HERV retroelement family still active in human (15, 16). We also discovered that the most recently integrated provirus subfamily of HERVK, HML2 (human mouse mammary tumour virus like-2) (11), was highly activated in senescent hMPCs (Fig. 1C). Using primers targeting different regions of HERVK transcripts, including Env, Pol, and Gag (26) (Fig. 1A), we confirmed that HERVK retroelements were highly expressed during cellular senescence by RT-qPCR, showing a similar pattern of increase with the senescence marker p21Cip1, while Lamin-associated protein LAP2 (TMPO) decreased during senescence as reported previously (27) (Fig. 1D). Likewise, RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) analysis also showed increased cytoplasmic HERVK RNA signals in HGPS and WS hMPCs compared to WT hMPCs (Fig. 1E).
Consistent with activated HERVK transcription in aged hMPCs, we observed a reduced level of global DNA methylation in the entire HERVK family in both prematurely aged hMPCs (Fig. 1F). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR further showed that HERVK activation was correlated with a decrease of the repressive histone mark (H3K9me3) at the HERVK-LTR5HS in aged hMPCs (Fig. 1G). These data indicate that the epigenetic derepression of HERVK loci, likely contributing to HERVK transcription, is associated with cellular aging.
Next, we asked whether unconstrained endogenous retrovirus expression elicits the production of HERVK protein components, the retrotransposition, and even the formation of RVLPs. Western blotting and immunofluorescence analyses showed increased HERVK-Env protein levels in prematurely aged hMPCs (Fig. 1H-I). In line with increased levels of HERVK retroelement RNA and protein, immuno-TEM analysis with an anti-HERVK-Env antibody (28) showed that HERVK formed RVLPs in senescent cells with a diameter ranging from 80 to 120 nm (Fig. 1J). Cumulatively, these data present evidences of HERVK activation, mobilization and packaging in senescent cells.
HERVK expression triggers innate immune response and cellular senescence
To determine whether the cellular consequences caused by activation of endogenous HERVK, we used a CRISPR-dCas9 transcriptional activation system containing activation protein complexes (synergistic activation mediators, SAM) with sgRNA targeting to HERVK-LTR5HS promoter region (29) (Fig. 2A) and confirmed activation of the HERVK endogenous retrotransposon elements by western blotting (Fig. 2B). We found that HERVK activation caused hMPC senescence, as evidenced by an increased relative percentage of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal)-positive cells (Fig. 2C). To further assess whether endogenous HERVK activation is a driving force of cellular senescence, we used HERVK-specific shRNA (Fig. 2A,D) (26, 30) to knock down HERVK in prematurely aged hMPCs and found that repression of HERVK alleviated hMPC senescence (Fig. 2E).
(A) Schematic diagram of experimental design to investigate the role of HERVK in cellular senescence by activation or knockdown of HERVK. (B) Left: Western blotting of HERVK-Env in WT hMPCs transduced with non-targeting sgNTC or sgHERVK using a CRISPR activation system. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative levels of HERVK-Env. n = 3. *P < 0.05 (t test). (C) Left: SA-β-gal staining of WT hMPCs transduced with non-targeting sgNTC or sgHERVK using a CRISPR activation system. Scale bars, 20 μm. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative percentages of SA-β-gal-positive cells. n = 3, biological samples. Over 100 cells were quantified in each sample. **P < 0.01 (t test). (D) Left: Western blotting of HERVK-Env in prematurely senescent HGPS and WS hMPCs after transduction of lentivirus delivering shControl or shHERVK. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative protein levels of HERVK-Env, which was normalized to respective shControl group in corresponding cell lines. n = 3. **P < 0.01 (t test). (E) Left: SA-β-gal staining of HGPS and WS hMPCs after transduction of lentivirus delivering shControl or shHERVK. Scale bars, 20 μm. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative percentages of SA-β-gal-positive cells, which was normalized to respective shControl group in corresponding cell lines. n = 3, biological samples. Over 100 cells were quantified in each sample. **P < 0.01 (t test). (F) Left: Representative HERVK DNA-FISH images in EP and LP of WT hMPCs. Higher magnification of indicated regions indicating fluorescent spots in the cytoplasm is shown at right. Scale bars, 10 μm (left); 200 nm (right). Cyto: cytoplasm, Nuc: nucleus. Right: Quantification of relative number of fluorescent spots in the cytoplasm. Over 10 cells were quantified in each sample. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. * **P < 0.001 (t test). (G) Schematic diagram of the innate immune response through the cGAS-STING pathway. The viral nucleic acid DNA is detected by cGAS, which activates STING, which thereby activates TBK1, IRF3, and RelA/NF-ΚB (RelA) via phosphorylation, resulting in p-IRF3 and p-RelA translocation into the nucleus and transcription of SASP. (H) Immunoprecipitation assay showing assessment of cGAS binding to cytoplasmic HERVK DNA fragments in EP and LP of WT hMPCs by qPCR. n = 4, wells in each condition. **P < 0.01 (t test). (I) ELISA analysis of 2’3’-cGAMP levels in WT, HGPS, and WS hMPCs. cGAMP levels were normalized to cell number. n = 3, biological samples. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 (t test). (J) Left: Western blotting of p-TBK1, p-IRF3 and p-RelA in WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. GAPDH was used as the loading control. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative protein levels of p-TBK1, p-IRF3 and p-RelA. n = 3. **P < 0.01 (t test). (K) ELISA analysis of IL6 levels in the culture medium of WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. IL6 levels were normalized to cell number. n = 3, biological samples. ***P < 0.001 (t test). (L) ELISA analysis of IL6 levels in the culture medium of HGPS and WS hMPCs after transduction of shControl or shHERVK lentivirus. IL6 levels were normalized to cell number. n = 3, biological samples. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 (t test). (M) Left: Western blotting showing the protein levels of p-TBK1, p-IRF3 and p-RelA in WT hMPCs transduced with non-targeting sgNTC or sgHERVK using a CRISPR activation system. GAPDH was used a loading control. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative levels of p-TBK1, p-IRF3 and p-RelA. n = 3. *P < 0.05 (t test). (N) ELISA analysis of IL6 levels in the culture medium of WT hMPCs (P6) transduced with non-targeting sgNTC or sgHERVK using a CRISPR activation system. IL6 levels were normalized to cell number. n = 3, biological samples. ***P < 0.001 (t test). All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
HERVK-encoded Pol protein possesses reverse transcription activity that can reverse-transcribe HERVK RNA into DNA (10, 11), thereby generating additional HERVK DNA outside of the genome. Consistent with increased HERVK RNA (Fig. 1E), we also observed a concomitantly increased HERVK DNA in the cytoplasm of aged hMPCs by single molecule DNA-FISH (Fig. 2F). These excessive cytoplasmic DNA may be recognized by the key DNA sensor cGMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and trigger innate immune response (Fig. 2G) (33, 34). Immunoprecipitation analysis verified increased cGAS enrichment on the cytoplasmic HERVK DNA in senescent hMPCs, whereas it was hardly enriched in early-passage younng hMPCs, indicating that the presence of cytosolic HERVK DNA triggers activation of cGAS-STING pathway (Fig. 2H). To further investigate the activation state of the cGAS-STING DNA-sensing pathway, we examined key features including the second messenger 2’3’-cGAMP, phosphorylation of RelA/NF-ΚB, TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), and IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), as well as proinflammatory cytokine expression in aged hMPCs (Fig. 2G) (33). As expected, we observed an increase in 2’3’-cGAMP content, phosphorylation of TBK1, RelA and IRF3, and the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines including IL6, classified as SASP factors (35, 36) in senescent hMPCs (Fig. 2J-K). Knockdown of HERVK alleviated cellular senescence and SASP (Fig. 2L). In contrast, activation of endogenous HERVK via the CRISPR-dCas9 system led to an increase in the levels of phosphorylated TBK1, RelA, and IRF3, and upregulated expression of SASP cytokines in hMPCs (Fig. 2M-N). All these data place induced HERVK expression as a contributing factor for cellular senescence, at least in part by activating the innate immunity pathway.
Extracellular HERVK induces cellular senescence
Given the presence of HERVK RVLPs in aged cells and previous studies showing that HERVK RVLPs produced by tumor cells are released into the medium and taken up by human cells (37), we asked whether HERVK RVLPs produced by senescent cells could be released extracellularly and convey senescence signals to non-senescent cells (Fig. 3A). To answer this question, we employed a sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology to detect the level of HERVK RNA, which is the genetic material packaged in RVLPs (10, 11, 38), in the conditioned medium (CM) harvested from WT and prematurely senescent hMPCs. We found that HERVK RNA level was 5~12 times higher in CM from prematurely senescent hMPCs compared with that from WT hMPCs (Fig. 3B). In addition, ELISA assay demonstrated increased HERVK-Env protein levels in the medium of senescent hMPCs (Fig. 3C). Based on Immuno-TEM images, we detected RVLPs outside the cells with diameters spanning from 80 to 120 nm, that were mainly present in aged hMPCs (Fig. 3D).
(A) Schematic diagram of the proposed HERVK viral life cycle in senescent cells, with some RVLPs assembled intracellularly while others are budding from the cell membrane and released outside of the cells. (B) Left: Digital droplet PCR detected HERVK levels in microvesicles isolated from conditioned medium (CM) of WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs cultures. ddH2O and cDNA from aged hMPCs were used as a negative and positive control, respectively. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative RNA copy number of HERVK in the medium from the same amount of cell number of each group. n = 3, biological samples. ***P < 0.001 (t test). (C) ELISA analysis of HERVK-Env levels in the concentrated CM of WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs. HERVK-Env levels were normalized to cell number. n = 3, biological samples. **P < 0.01 (t test). (D) TEM immune-gold labelling in WT, HGPS and WS hMPCs with HERVK-Env antibody. Regions highlighted by white squares indicate HERVK putative RVLPs labelled with gold particles budding from cell membranes or outside the cells. Higher magnification of the indicated regions is shown at right. Scale bars, 200 nm (left), 100 nm (right). Dashed lines label the cell membrane. E: Extracellular; I: Intracellular. (E) Schematic diagram of treatment of young hMPCs with CM from senescent cells. Cells in red and yellow color represent senescent and young cells, respectively. (F) TEM of young hMPCs treated with CM from WT or WS hMPCs. Regions highlighted by white squares indicate putative RVLPs adhering to the surface of cells. Higher magnification of the indicated regions is shown at right. Scale bars, 200 nm (left), 100 nm (right). Dashed lines label the cell membrane. E: Extracellular; I: Intracellular. (G) Heatmap showing the transcript levels of HERVK and senescence markers genes in young hMPCs treated with CM of WT, HGPS, WS and LP WT hMPCs by RT-qPCR. n = 3, biological samples with 4 well replicates in each set. (H) Left: SA-β-gal staining of young hMPCs (WT) treated with CM from WT, HGPS, WS and LP WT hMPCs. Scale bars, 20 μm. Right: Statistical analysis of the relative percentages of SA-β-gal-positive cells. n = 3, biological samples. Over 100 cells were quantified in each sample. ***P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA). (I) Schematic diagram of HERVK depletion from the CM of senescent cells using an anti-HERVK-Env antibody. The HERVK-depleted CM was used to treat young hMPCs and the immuno-precipitates were used for western blotting. Cells in red and yellow color represent senescent and young cells, respectively. (J) Heatmap showing the levels of HERVK and senescence marker genes in young hMPCs (WT P6) treated with CM from HGPS, WS and LP WT hMPCs or HERVK-depleted counterparts by RT-qPCR. 4 wells in each condition. (K) Statistical analysis of the relative percentages of SA-β-gal-positive cells in young hMPCs (WT) treated with CM from HGPS, WS and LP WT hMPCs or HERVK-depleted counterparts. n = 3, biological samples. Over 100 cells are quantified in each sample. **P < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA).
We next treated young hMPCs (WT) with CM collected from HGPS, WS, or RS hMPCs (collectively called “old” CM), using CM collected from young WT hMPCs as control (Fig. 3E). With TEM analysis, we found that extracellular RVLPs derived from old CM adhered to the cell surface of young hMPCs (Fig. 3F). After the old CM treatment, we observed an increase in HERVK RNA in young hMPCs (Fig. 3G), implying that HERVK in the old CM may be transmitted into targeted cells. Moreover, we found that the invaded HERVK elements was associated with an “aging-promoting” effect, that is, to induce accelerated cellular senescence in young hMPCs which were incubated with old CM (Fig. 3H).
To further investigate whether HERVK from the old CM is one of the major factors that cause senescence in young hMPCs, we then immuno-depleted HERVK in old CM using an anti-HERVK-Env antibody (39) (Fig. 3I). Immuno-depletion of HERVK from the old CM resulted in HERVK RNA reduction and alleviation of senescence phenotypes in young WT hMPCs as compared to those treated with old CM without immune-depletion (Fig. 3J-K). Collectively, the data above suggest that retroviral HERVK elements generated in aged cells can be released in a paracrine manner and trigger cellular senescence in recipient young cells.
Human endogenous retrovirus can be used as a biomarker of aging
Next, we sought to investigate whether elevated activation of human endogenous retrovirus HERVK is observed in human cells and organs during physiological aging. Indeed, we found that HERVK activation was pronounced in primary hMPCs derived from old individuals relative to their younger counterparts (Fig. 4A-B) (21, 43–46). Likewise, in skin tissues obtained from young and old donors, HERVK-Env expression was markedly increased with age (Fig. 4A, C). More importantly, ELISA analysis of human serum revealed increased HERVK-Env level in the serum from old individuals relative to that from young individuals (Fig. 4A, D). Taken together, these results indicate that human endogenous retrovirus HERVK may be used as a potential biomarker to assess human aging, and a potential therapeutic target to alleviate senescence.
(A) Left: Schematic diagram of primary hMPCs, skin and serum samples from young and old human donors. (B) Relative expression of HERVK in human primary MPCs from young and old donors by RT-qPCR. n = 4, number of individuals with 4 well duplicates for each individual. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (t test). (C) Right: Representative HERVK-Env immunohistochemistry staining in young and old human skin with higher magnification of indicated region shown. (Black boxes labelling cells in epidermis and red boxes labelling cells in derma). Scale bars, 50 μm (left), 10 μm (right). Right: Quantification of immunohistochemistry intensity of HERVK-Env, n = 3, number of donors in each group. Data are presented as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01 (t test). (D) ELISA analysis of HERVK-Env levels in serum from young and old donors. n = 30, number of donors in each group. ***P < 0.001 (t test). All data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Discussion
In this study, we discovered a positive feedback loop between human endogenous retrovirus HERVK activation and aging, represented as human endogenous retrovirus HERVK robustly activated across several aging models, which conversely enhances senescence. Our comprehensive analysis revealed several causal relationships: 1) Epigenetic derepression of HERVK leads to the accumulation of HERVK RNA, protein, and RVLPs in aged human cells; 2) Activation of endogenous HERVK is sufficient to promote cellular senescence partially through the activation of innate immunity pathway, while inactivation of HERVK alleviates senescence in various human aging models; 3) HERVK RVLPs can be secreted from aged cells in a paracrine manner and induce senescence in young cells; 4) Using antibodies to block the HERVK particles released from senescent cells abrogates their transmissible pro-senescence effect; 5) HERV activation is a characteristic of old human tissues, and the accumulation of circulating HERVK can be used as a potential serum biomarker for clinical aging assessment, and a potential therapeutic target for aging intervention (Fig. 5).
HERVK is upregulated during cellular senescence via an epigenetic derepression mechanism. An enhanced level of HERVK activates innate immune response, thereby inducing cellular senescence. HERVKs form RVLPs in senescent cells, which are released into the cultural medium and may transfer into younger cells causing their senescence in a paracrine manner. A HERVK neutralizing antibody blocks their transmissible pro-senescence effect, indicating HERVK functions as a driver of cellular senescence. Furthermore, HERVK can be detected in the blood of the elderly, suggesting that HERVK can be used as a diagnostic biomarker of human aging.
Based on these data, we hypothesize that HERVK functions as both a consequence and cause of aging. Although HERVK has not directly been implicated in the regulation of human aging, several studies have established a correlation between awakened HERVK retrovirus and aging-related disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (47–49) and neurodegenerative diseases (29, 39, 50–54). Notably, RVLPs produced by HERVK are known as a cancer indicator (28, 55), which may be due to (epi)genetic instabilities accumulated in cancer cells. We have demonstrated that aging-related HERVK activation is tuned by the cellular epigenetic clock, including DNA methylation and histone modifications (13, 53, 56). Thus, the presence of HERVK RVLPs both in the cytoplasm and the extracellular spaces is thereby likely indicative of accumulated (epi)genetic aberrations in aged cells. However, at tissue levels, whether HERVK is activated in specific organs/tissues and transmissible as a pro-senescence factor acros sorgans/tissues, and whether resurrection of endogenous retrovirus is conserved among other non-human species need to be further investigated. Therefore, future studies are in demand, such as to characterize endogenous retrovirus expression profiles across ages and species in large populations and examine the results with other aging clocks, e.g., DNA methylation and telomere length, et al.
We demonstrated that HERVK viral components could activate cellular innate immune sensors, including the cGAS-STING pathway, to initiate inflammatory responses and to trigger cellular senescence (33,57–60). It should be mentioned that mobilization of HERV repetitive sequences may cause genomic mutagenesis and abnormal chromosomal rearrangements (61, 62), which may also underlie HERVK-mediated pro-senescence events. Lastly, given that several antiretroviral drugs that can inhibit HERVK activity in the cells have been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (63), that HERVK-targeted cancer immunotherapies have also been reported (64, 65), and that antibodies of HERVK can block the pro-senescence effect of HERVK in our study, HERVK represents a druggable target for alleviating aspects of aging and improving overall human health.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2 mmol/L GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.1 mmol/L non-essential amino acids (NEAA, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Human MPCs (hMPCs) were grown on 0.1% gelatin (Sigma Aldrich)-coated plates (CORNING) in hMPC culture medium containing 90% MEM Alpha Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% FBS, 2 mmol/L GlutaMAX, 0.1 mmol/L NEEA, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1 ng/mL bFGF2 (Joint Protein Central). Cells were cultured in an incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed and boiled at 105°C for 10 min. Protein concentration was measured with the BCA Kit. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and electrotransferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and then blotted with substrates or Super Signal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Imaging was performed with the Image Lab software. Quantification was performed by ImageJ.
DNA / RNA isolation and (reverse transcription-) quantitative PCR ((RT-)qPCR)
Total genome DNA from cells was extracted using the DNA extraction Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions for qPCR. Total cell RNA was extracted in TRIzol and reverse transcribed to cDNA using GoScript Reverse Transcription System for RT-qPCR. RT-qPCR was performed using THUNDERBIRD qPCR Mix and the CFX384 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). RNA was extracted from medium using the QIAamp viral RNA mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)
Briefly, 20 μL reaction solution containing templates, primers and QX200 ddPCR EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) was mixed with 70 μL DG Oil (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) in a DG8 cartridge (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) by QX200 droplet generator (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The droplet was transferred to a 96 well plate and sealed with PX1™ PCR Plate Sealer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). PCR amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and the sample was subsequently subjected to QX200 droplet reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) to analyze the absolute copy number of HERVK in the medium.
ELISA
For the IL6 ELISA assay, medium was incubated in an IL6 antibody-coated plate which has been precoated at 4°C overnight according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The plate was then incubated with a detection antibody, Avidin-HRP and freshly mixed TMB substrate. After adding stop solution, the plate was measured at 450 nm. To measure HERVK-Env protein levels in medium or serum, medium or human serum was tested with the Human HERVK_7p22.1 Provirus Ancestral Env Polypretein (ERVK6) ELISA Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. 2’3’-cGAMP ELISA Kit was used to measure the levels of 2’3’-cGAMP in cells.
Immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry staining and microscopy
Cells seeded on coverslips were washed twice with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), permeabilized in 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS and blocked with 10% donkey serum. Coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies in blocking buffer at 4°C overnight and secondary antibodies for 1 hr at room temperature. Nuclei were labeled by Hoechst 33342. Immunohistochemistry staining of tissue sections was performed using the DAB Staining Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were taken with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope or LEICA Aperio CS2.
RNA / DNA-FISH
For RNA-FISH, cells seeded on coverslips were fixed in fresh 4% formaldehyde solution, permeabilized and digested. Probe HERVK Alexa Fluor 488 was added to wells for 3 hr at 41 + 1°C in a HB-1000 Hybridizer. Coverslips were incubated with amplification probes. Nuclei were labeled with DAPI solution and slides were mounted and subjected to Leica SP5 confocal microscope. The DNA of HERVK gene was detected by single molecule FISH. The senescent cells were sequentially treated with RNase A and fixed. The cells were then incubated with HERVK- or ACTIN-specific probe pairs in hybridization buffer. After three washes, the cells were incubated with amplification probes and a fluorescent probe for the single-molecule detection of HERVK DNA. Finally, the cells were counterstained with DAPI and imaged by confocal microscopy.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Cells were pelleted and fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde with Phosphate Buffer (PB) (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at room temperature for 20 min and then at 4°C overnight. Routine heavy metal staining was conducted. For Immuno-TEM, cells seeded in 35 mm petri dishes (CORNING) were fixed. Samples were dehydrated through an ethanol gradient, infiltrated and embedded in LR Gold resin containing initiator. Samples were then polymerized by UV light and sectioned using Leica EM UC7. For staining, sections were blocked at 2% BSA, incubated with anti-HERVK-Env. After washing, samples were incubated with gold-labelled anti-mouse secondary antibody, then fixed by 1% glutaraldehyde in ddH2O. After washing, sections were stained by 2% uranyl acetate before imaged using a TEM Spirit 120 kV (FEI Tecnai Spirit 120 kV).
Plasmid construction
To generate HERVK knockdown vectors, specific shRNAs were cloned into MluI / ClaI sites of lentivirus vector pLVTHM plasmids (addgene #12247). For activating endogenous HERVK, lentiviral constructs for NTC or HERVK LTR targeting sgRNA were cloned into lenti-SAM v2 (addgene #75112) by ESP3I site and was co-transfected with lenti-MPH v2 (addgene #89308).
Lentivirus production
To package lentiviral constructs, HEK293T cells were transfected with lentiviral vectors together with the packaging plasmids pMD2.G (addgene, #12260) and psPAX2 (addgene, #12259) using lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). Supernatants containing lentivirus were harvested at 48 hr and 72 hr after transfection, filtered with a 0.2 μm filter, concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 19,400 rpm for 2.5 hr. The virus pellets were suspended and assessed for viral titers.
Cell treatment
For lentivirus transduction, hMPCs were seeded (P0 post treatment) and incubated with lentivirus in the presence of polybrene for 24 hr. After two passages, cells were processed for SA-β-gal staining and RNA / DNA extraction. For conditioned medium treatment, 50% conditioned medium + 50% fresh medium were used for culturing early passage WT hMPCs in the presence of polybrene. The cells were passaged and used for SA-β-gal staining and RNA / DNA extraction.
SA-β-gal staining
SA-β-gal staining was performed as described previously (22, 72). In brief, cells were fixed with a buffer containing 2% (w/v) formaldehyde and 0.2% (w/v) glutaraldehyde for 5 min and treated with staining buffer containing 1 mg/mL X-gal at 37°C overnight. Optical microscope was used to observe stained cells and the percentage of positive cells was analyzed by ImageJ software.
ChIP-qPCR
ChIP-qPCR was performed as previously described with slight modifications (73). Briefly, cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde in PBS and then quenched by 125 mM Glycine. Cells were lysed on ice for 10 min and subjected to sonication using Covaris S220. The collected supernatants were incubated with Dynabeads Protein A pre-conjuncted with indicated antibodies. After washing, samples were digested by protease K (New England Biolabs), eluted and cross-link-reversed. DNA was extracted using Phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol and the eluted DNA was subjected to qPCR analysis. For immunoprecipitation of cGAS, the cytoplasmic fractions of cells was extracted after fixation (57), which was incubated with cGAS antibody and Dynabeads Protein A at 4°C overnight. The DNA extraction was performed as above.
RNA-seq library construction and sequencing
RNA-seq libraries were prepared and sequenced as previously reported (74). In brief, total RNA was extracted from 1 × 106 cells per duplicate using TRIzol reagents, genomic DNA was removed and mRNA was isolated. Then, library preparation, quality control and high-throughput sequencing were conducted by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co. Ltd. For library construction, NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) was used according to the manufacturer’s directions. High-throughput sequencing was performed on HiSeq X Ten platforms according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
RNA-seq data processing and analysis of expression level of repetitive elements
The processing pipeline for RNA-seq data has been reported previously (67, 75). Pair-end raw reads were trimmed by the TrimGalore (version 0.4.5) (Babraham Bioinformatics) (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) and mapped to human (Homo sapiens) hg19 reference genome obtained from UCSC genome browser database using hisat2 (version 2.0.4) (76). High quality mapped reads (score of mapping quality more than 20) were then used for counting the reads that mapped to each gene by HTSeq (version 0.11.0) (77). To evaluate expression levels of repetitive elements, the Repenrich2 pipeline was implemented (82).
Whole genome bisulfite sequencing library construction and sequencing
Library preparation and sequencing were performed as previously reported (67). In brief, genomic DNA was extracted from 2 × 106 cells per duplicate using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits (QIAGEN) and sheared to 100-300 bp with a sonicator. Then, library preparation, bisulfite treatment, quality control and sequencing were conducted by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co. Ltd.
Whole genome bisulfite sequencing data processing
WGBS data analysis was performed as previously reported (67). In brief, raw sequencing reads were trimmed by fastp software (version 0.19.10) with default parameters (88). Then, cleaned reads were mapped to human (Homo sapiens) hg19 reference genome obtained from UCSC genome browser database using bsmap (version 2.90) with parameters “-v 0.1 -g 1 -R -u” (89). CpG DNA methylation levels for each cytosine site were calculated by the methratio program provided by bsmap. To ensure the accuracy of methylation level detection, forward and reverse strand reads for each CpG site were combined and only CpG sites with depth of more than 5 were kept for downstream analysis.
Statistical analysis
All data were statistically analyzed using the PRISM version 8 software (GraphPad Software). Results were presented as mean ± SEM. Comparisons were conducted using the two-tailed student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (*), P values < 0.01 were considered highly statistically significant (**) and P values < 0.001 were considered highly statistically significant (***).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Center for Biological Imaging (CBI), Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science for TEM analysis, and we would be grateful to C. Peng for TEM sample preparation and L. Zhang for the help of TEM operation. We also would like to express our gratitude to Y. Li (Tsinghua University) for immuno-TEM sample preparation and J. Hao (Institute of Biophysics) for help with image scanning. We also would like to thank Z. Zhang, Y. Tao (Spatial FISH, Co., Ltd) for the technical help in the FISH experiment. We also would like to thank L. Bai, Q. Chu, X. Zhuo, J. Lu, Y. Yang, R. Bai, and S. Ma for administrative assistance.
References and Notes
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.↵
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.
- 52.
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.
- 59.
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.
- 67.↵
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
- 71.
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82.↵
- 83.
- 84.
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.
- 88.↵
- 89.↵