Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in-vivo magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain

View ORCID ProfileCihan Göksu, View ORCID ProfileKlaus Scheffler, View ORCID ProfileFróði Gregersen, View ORCID ProfileHasan H. Eroğlu, View ORCID ProfileRahel Heule, View ORCID ProfileHartwig R. Siebner, View ORCID ProfileLars G. Hanson, View ORCID ProfileAxel Thielscher
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436558
Cihan Göksu
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
2High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cihan Göksu
  • For correspondence: cihang@drcmr.dk
Klaus Scheffler
2High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
3Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Klaus Scheffler
Fróði Gregersen
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Center for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
5Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fróði Gregersen
Hasan H. Eroğlu
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Center for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hasan H. Eroğlu
Rahel Heule
2High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
3Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rahel Heule
Hartwig R. Siebner
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
6Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark
7Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hartwig R. Siebner
Lars G. Hanson
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Center for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lars G. Hanson
Axel Thielscher
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Center for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Axel Thielscher
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Purpose Magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) combines MR brain imaging with the injection of time-varying weak currents (1-2 mA) to assess the current flow pattern in the brain. However, the utility of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and poor image quality.

Methods We recently introduced a multi-gradient-echo-based MRCDI approach that has the hitherto best documented efficiency. We now advanced our MRCDI approach in three directions and performed phantom and in-vivo human brain experiments for validation: First, we verified the importance of enhanced spoiling and optimize it for imaging of the human brain. Second, we improved the sensitivity and spatial resolution by using acquisition weighting. Third, we added navigators as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, we tested our optimized MRCDI method by using 1 mA transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) currents injected via two different electrode montages in five subjects.

Results For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect magnetic field changes caused by the TES current flow at a sensitivity level of 84 pT, representing in a twofold increase relative to our original method. Comparing both methods to current flow simulations based on personalized head models demonstrated a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ΔR2=0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ΔR2=0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite of the strongly improved measurement quality. This suggests that MRCDI can reveal useful information for the improvement of head models used for current flow simulations.

Conclusion The advanced method strongly improves the sensitivity and robustness of MRCDI and is an important step from proof-of-concept studies towards a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.

Competing Interest Statement

Hartwig R. Siebner has received honoraria as speaker from Sanofi Genzyme, Denmark and Novartis, Denmark, as consultant from Lundbeck, Denmark, Lophora, Denmark, Sanofi Genzyme, Denmark and as editor-in-chief (NeuroImage Clinical) and senior editor (NeuroImage) from Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. He has received royalties as book editor from Springer Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany and Gyldendal, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 23, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in-vivo magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in-vivo magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain
Cihan Göksu, Klaus Scheffler, Fróði Gregersen, Hasan H. Eroğlu, Rahel Heule, Hartwig R. Siebner, Lars G. Hanson, Axel Thielscher
bioRxiv 2021.03.23.436558; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436558
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in-vivo magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain
Cihan Göksu, Klaus Scheffler, Fróði Gregersen, Hasan H. Eroğlu, Rahel Heule, Hartwig R. Siebner, Lars G. Hanson, Axel Thielscher
bioRxiv 2021.03.23.436558; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436558

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4095)
  • Biochemistry (8786)
  • Bioengineering (6493)
  • Bioinformatics (23386)
  • Biophysics (11766)
  • Cancer Biology (9167)
  • Cell Biology (13290)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7422)
  • Ecology (11386)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15119)
  • Genetics (10413)
  • Genomics (14024)
  • Immunology (9145)
  • Microbiology (22108)
  • Molecular Biology (8793)
  • Neuroscience (47445)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1423)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3711)
  • Plant Biology (8063)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2215)
  • Systems Biology (6021)
  • Zoology (1251)