Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Spatiotemporal patterns in Golden-cheeked Warbler breeding habitat quality and quantity

View ORCID ProfileLindsay M. Dreiss, Paul Sanchez-Navarro, Bryan Bird
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.25.436967
Lindsay M. Dreiss
Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lindsay M. Dreiss
  • For correspondence: lrosa@defenders.org
Paul Sanchez-Navarro
Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan Bird
Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Golden-cheeked Warbler, Setophaga chrysoparia, is a migratory songbird listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act that breeds exclusively in central Texas and is heavily impacted by habitat conversion. The species relies on mixed Ashe-juniper and oak woodlands for nest-building and shelter during spring and early summer months. Using land cover data spanning the last 25 years, we conduct a geospatial analysis to quantify changes and\ identify shifts in breeding habitat quantity and quality. Since 1985, 13% of all forests within the warbler’s breeding range were disturbed, with greater incidences near San Antonio (32%) and Austin (24%) metropolitan areas. Additionally, data show a 45% decrease in high-quality habitat (i.e., intact mixed or evergreen core forests) and a decrease in patch size. Habitats within protected areas see a less sharp decline in habitat quality and large increases in warbler sightings, but these only represent 10% of all highest-quality habitat in the breeding range. Drastic declines in habitat quality suggest that generalized metrics of conversion may underestimate true habitat loss as degradation may impact the ecological viability of remaining forests for warbler nesting. Further evidence suggests that the few protected areas within the Texas range continue to play a significant role in warbler breeding. This information will assist researchers and managers prioritizing conservation action and will inform upcoming species status determinations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • add preliminary analysis of another dataset

  • https://osf.io/t4djx/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 30, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spatiotemporal patterns in Golden-cheeked Warbler breeding habitat quality and quantity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Spatiotemporal patterns in Golden-cheeked Warbler breeding habitat quality and quantity
Lindsay M. Dreiss, Paul Sanchez-Navarro, Bryan Bird
bioRxiv 2021.03.25.436967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.25.436967
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Spatiotemporal patterns in Golden-cheeked Warbler breeding habitat quality and quantity
Lindsay M. Dreiss, Paul Sanchez-Navarro, Bryan Bird
bioRxiv 2021.03.25.436967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.25.436967

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3505)
  • Biochemistry (7348)
  • Bioengineering (5324)
  • Bioinformatics (20266)
  • Biophysics (10019)
  • Cancer Biology (7744)
  • Cell Biology (11305)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6437)
  • Ecology (9953)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13325)
  • Genetics (9361)
  • Genomics (12586)
  • Immunology (7702)
  • Microbiology (19024)
  • Molecular Biology (7443)
  • Neuroscience (41041)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1229)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2138)
  • Physiology (3161)
  • Plant Biology (6861)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1273)
  • Synthetic Biology (1896)
  • Systems Biology (5313)
  • Zoology (1089)