New Results

Deficiency of SYCP3-related XLR3 disrupts the initiation of meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in mouse spermatogenesis

Natali Sobel Naveh, Robert J. Foley, Katelyn R. DeNegre, Tristan C. Evans, Anne Czechanski, Laura G. Reinholdt, Michael J. O’Neill
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.30.437712

Abstract

In mammals, the X and Y chromosomes share only small regions of homology called pseudo-autosomal regions (PAR) where pairing and recombination in spermatocytes can occur. Consequently, the sex chromosomes remain largely unsynapsed during meiosis I and are sequestered in a nuclear compartment known as the XY body where they are transcriptionally silenced in a process called meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI). MSCI mirrors meiotic silencing of unpaired chromatin (MSUC), the sequestration and transcriptional repression of unpaired DNA observed widely in eukaryotes. MSCI is initiated by the assembly of the axial elements of the synaptonemal complex (SC) comprising the structural proteins SYCP2 and SYCP3 followed by the ordered recruitment of DNA Damage Response (DDR) factors to effect gene silencing. However, the precise mechanism of how unsynapsed chromatin is detected in meiocytes is poorly understood. The sex chromosomes in eutherian mammals harbor multiple clusters of SYCP3-like amplicons comprising the Xlr gene family, only a handful of which have been functionally studied. We used a shRNA-transgenic mouse model to create a deficiency in the testis-expressed multicopy Xlr3 genes to investigate their role in spermatogenesis. Here we show that knockdown of Xlr3 in mice leads to spermatogenic defects and a skewed sex ratio that can be traced to MSCI breakdown. Spermatocytes deficient in XLR3 form the XY body and the SC axial elements therein, but are compromised in their ability to recruit DDR components to the XY body.

Author Summary A key event in the production of sperm is the pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosome pairs to facilitate genetic recombination during the first meiotic division. Chromosomal abnormalities that undermine pairing and synapsis in spermatocytes trigger a checkpoint that leads to removal of the abnormal cells via programmed cell death. In mammals, the sex chromosomes, X and Y, lack homology through most of their length and remain largely unpaired. To avoid triggering the checkpoint the X and Y are sequestered in a specialized nuclear compartment called the XY body. DNA damage response (DDR) proteins are recruited to the XY body in a highly ordered progression leading to repression of all gene transcription from the sex chromosomes. We show that knocking down expression of the X-linked SYCR3-like gene, Xlr3, disrupts sex chromosome gene silencing by interfering with recruitment of DDR factors, leading to compromised sperm production.

Introduction

In eukaryotes, genetic recombination between paired, homologous chromosomes is enabled by induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and repaired by factors of the DNA Damage Response (DDR) during meiosis I. Unpaired chromosomes or chromosomal segments are also subject to DSBs, yet they undergo DDR repair mechanisms specific to unsynapsed chromatin [1]. These repair mechanisms typically involve sequestration of unsynapsed chromatin in defined nuclear domains and subsequent transcriptional silencing and heterochromatinization in a process known as meiotic silencing of unpaired chromatin (MSUC) [2, 3].

In mammalian spermatogenesis, synapsis of the heterologous X and Y chromosomes is delayed compared to autosomes and is restricted to the pseudo-autosomal regions (PARs) [4, 5]. As a consequence, during the pachytene stage of prophase I a process consistent with MSUC occurs: a distinct nuclear compartment known as the XY body forms, wherein DSB repair depends on transcriptional inactivation of the sex chromosomes (MSCI) effected by DDR factors distinct from that of the synapsed autosomes [6]. MSCI initiates in pachynema and persists through meiosis and into spermiogenesis where the transcriptional repressed state is referred to as post-meiotic sex chromatin (PMSC) [7]. Most X and Y-linked mRNA-encoding genes are subject to silencing, although a few notable genes escape and are actively transcribed post-meiotically [8, 9]. Disruption of MSCI activates the pachytene meiotic checkpoint (PMC) and spermatocytes with active sex chromosome transcription undergo arrest and apoptosis [2].

The sensing of unsynapsed chromatin at the onset of homologous pairing is not well understood, but it appears to accompany the assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and recruitment of the first DDR factors. After DSBs are induced, homologous chromosomes begin to pair and synapse as the SC assembles [10]. Homologs are arranged in chromosome loops anchored at the axial elements (AE) of the SC. The AE are constituted by Synaptonemal Complex Proteins 2 and 3 (SYCP2, SYCP3) [11, 12], which are necessary for the early events of DDR including recruitment of RPA, HORMAD1/2 and ATR to DSBs [13]. For reasons that are unclear, the DDR cascade in early pachynema is slightly different within the XY body: DSBs attract the damage sensors BRCA1 and TOPBP1, and ATR displaces from the axes into the loops [14–17] where it phosphorylates H2AX, leading to deposition of the repressive chromatin mark histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) [18], sumoylation (SUMO1) [14] and ultimately to MSCI.

The precise role of SYCP3 in sensing unsynapsed chromatin is unknown. SYCP3 is a highly conserved SC component found in the genomes of most metazoans, typically as a single copy autosomal gene [19]. However, in eutherian mammals numerous SYCP3-like amplicons are found across the X and Y chromosomes. The amplicons comprise the mammalian X-linked Lymphocyte Regulated (Xlr) superfamily [20] which includes: SYCP3-like X-linked (Slx) and SYCP3-like Y-linked (Sly) genes found in certain species of Mus; the Xlr3, 4 and 5 triad found in a variety of Rodentia, and the FAM9A, B and C genes in primates [21–24]. The function of most Xlr members is unknown, however Cocquet and co-workers have shown that Slx/Slxl1 and Sly are expressed in post-meiotic spermatids where they play antagonistic roles in the maintenance of PMSC [22, 25, 26]. Moreover, copy number variation of Slx/Slxl1 and Sly between species of Mus is thought to underlie male sterility in inter-subspecific hybrids underscoring the importance of the Xlr family members in spermatogenesis [27].

Here we investigate the function of the Xlr3 genes utilizing a transgenic mouse capable of tissue-specific expression of a short-hairpin RNA targeting Xlr3 mRNA. Unlike other Xlr family members, which are typically present in dozens of copies, the Xlr3family consists of three closely-linked, protein-encoding paralogs, Xlr3a, Xlr3b, and Xlr3c. These genes are broadly expressed in mouse fetal and adult tissues and one paralog, Xlr3b, is imprinted in developing and adult mouse brain where it is expressed predominantly from the maternal X [28]. The three functional copies, hereafter referred to as Xlr3, encode a near-identical 26 kDa protein that is expressed in testis [21]. We show that Xlr3 expression initiates during early meiotic prophase I where the protein localizes to the XY body in primary spermatocytes. Germ-cell specific knockdown of Xlr3 mRNA in shRNA-transgenic males leads to partial disruption of spermatogenesis, reduced sperm count and offspring with a skewed sex ratio. Examination of sex-linked gene expression and localization of DDR factors points to a breakdown in the earliest stages of MSCI in the Xlr3 knockdown males, implicating Xlr3 as the earliest acting factor involved in XY body formation and the only known sex-linked factor implicated in MSCI.

Results

Xlr3 is a multicopy gene encoding an Sycp3-like Cor1 domain

Xlr superfamily genes are scattered in multicopy clusters across the mouse X chromosome. The Xlr3a/b/c paralogs map to a small cluster encompassed within ~250 kilobases on mouse XA7.3 (Fig. 1A). Xlr3a/b/c encode near-identical proteins; XLR3B and XLR3C contain a single residue difference, while XLR3A contains eight amino acid substitutions compared to the other two paralogs (Fig. 1B). Our current understanding of structure/function relationships of Xlr superfamily members is informed by structural studies of the family progenitor, Sycp3. The N-terminus of SYCP3 binds DNA to facilitate the scaffolding of homologous chromosomes. Central coiled-coil helices are formed by the Cor1 domain, which tetramerizes to create SYCP3 fibers, while assembly of fibers into larger filaments is governed by the C-terminal region [29]. While the Cor1 domain is the most highly conserved segment among Xlr superfamily members, they all possess a monopartite nuclear localization signal (RKRK) within the divergent N-terminus (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Xlr3 is a family within the Xlr superfamily with X-linked copies and a Cor1 protein domain.

A) The three open reading frame-containing functional Xlr3 copies are located on Mus musculus X7A.3. Diagram based on mm10 genome build. B) Percent identity matrices of the functional Xlr3 paralogs at the mRNA (left) and protein (right) levels generated using ClustalW. C) The protein structure encoded by the XLR A/B/C paralogs have a COR1 protein domain and similar domain organization compared to other XLR superfamily members from the N-to C-terminal regions. Color indicates residue conservation wherein gray indicates in/del sites, and red or blue indicate high or low side chain similarity, respectively. Diagram generated with amino acid sequences aligned by COBALT (NCBI).

Xlr3 is upregulated in early prophase I and colocalizes with the XY body in pachynema

To quantify Xlr3 transcript levels during spermatogenesis, quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) using primers common to the three Xlr3 mRNA paralogs (a/b/c) was used. In the testes of staged-prepubertal mice, Xlr3 transcription begins in pre-meiotic stages, but increases sharply from 8.5 days post-partum (dpp), representing meiotic entry, through 10.5dpp, representing prophase I leptonema (Fig. 2A). Xlr3 transcript abundance peaks by 11.5dpp, at which point cells enter and progress through zygonema (Fig.2A).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Xlr3 expression is regulated stage-specifically in mouse spermatogenesis and localizes to the XY body during meiosis I.

A) Xlr3 mRNA expression increases during pre-leptotene stages (8.5-9.5 dpp) and is three-fold higher in zygotene (11.5 dpp) than 6.5 dpp. B) The XLR3 protein is only observed in the nuclear fraction from 10.5 dpp and strongly at 11.5 dpp through leptonema/zygonema. C-D) Immunocytochemistry of mouse spermatocyte chromosome spreads with DAPI (grey), SYCP3 (magenta), and XLR3 (yellow) reveals XLR3 localization. C) During early pachytene, XLR3 colocalizes with SYCP3 on the X and Y chromosome axes, indicated with a dotted circle. D) By late pachytene, XLR3 moves to form a cloud around the XY bivalent, indicated with a dotted circle. Scale bar = 6 μm.

While Xlr3 transcripts are detected before meiotic entry, XLR3 protein is not detectable via immunoblot until 10.5-11.5dpp, where it appears restricted to the nucleus (Fig.2B). Thus, XLR3 translation and nuclear localization coincide with the appearance of DSBs during leptonema [6]. Through immunocytochemistry (ICC), we observed specific XLR3 protein subcellular localization to the XY body during pachynema (Fig.2C-D). In early pachynema, XLR3 closely associates with the sex chromosome axes, including on the PAR (Fig.2C). By late pachynema, XLR3 appears to move away from the axes, but maintains association with the XY body, suggesting it translocates to the XY chromatin loops (Fig.2D).

shRNA-Xlr3 activity significantly reduces Xlr3 abundance in mouse testis

Upregulation in early prophase I and localization to the XY body suggests a possible role for Xlr3 in sex chromosome regulation in meiosis I. To explore this possibility, we created a mouse model in which Xlr3 function is abrogated through RNA interference (RNAi) in an approach similar to that described by Cocquet et al. [22, 25]. To knock down Xlr3 post-transcriptionally, we designed a construct containing a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) with sequence complementary to the Xlr3 exon3/4 region (Fig. 3A) that is invariant among the Xlr3 paralogs but divergent from Xlr4 and Xlr5 at several sites (Fig. S2A). A floxed stop cassette between the ROSA26 promoter and the Xlr3-shRNA transgene was excised by crossing to a Ddx4-Vasa Cre recombinase mouse, allowing initiation of expression of the shRNA in spermatogonia [30] (Fig. S1). Efficacy of the shRNA knockdown was assessed via qRT-PCR using primers targeting exon 3 of Xlr3, the site of shRNA binding, and primers further downstream at exon 6. Xlr3 transcript abundance was decreased by approximately 50% in shRNA-Xlr3 mouse testis compared to that of age-matched wild type males (Fig. 3B). Immunofluorescence (IF) was used to quantify the effect of this knock down on XLR3 protein levels in spermatocytes. Using γH2AX as a marker for the XY body, we quantified the XLR3 signal overlap in wild type and shRNA-Xlr3 pachytene spermatocytes. Compared to the wild type, shRNA-Xlr3 cells had on average approximately 50% of the IF signal (Fig. 3C), suggesting the reduction of protein product is directly proportional to that of Xlr3 transcript levels.

Supplementary Figure 1.
Supplementary Figure 1. Breeding schematic of shRNA-X/r3 transgenic mouse.

1) The linearized vector was electroporated into cells and incorporated into the ROSA26 locus on chromosome 6 by homologous recombination. Chimeric mice were produced by blastocyst incorporation. 2) Mice with full-length construct were crossed to mice expressing flippase to recombine the FRT sites surrounding the neomycin cassette. 3) Mice with shortened construct were crossed to Ddx4-Vasa-Cre mice expressing Cre recombinase in germ cells. The stop cassette was excised and shRNA-X/r3 was expressed in a tissue-specific manner. 4) Ubiquitously expressing shRNA-X/r3 mice were generated by breeding mice with the active construct in the germ line.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. The shRNA-Xlr3 targets transcripts at exon 3 and transgenic mice display Xlr3 knock down.

A) Diagram of Xlr3 gene sequence and the location of shRNA-Xlr3 targeting. Gray and black boxes represent UTRs and ORF regions, respectively. B) Xlr3 mRNA is knocked down ~50% at 9.5 dpp in shRNA-Xlr3 compared to age-matched wild type mice. Expression levels were assessed by qRT-PCR of whole testis cDNA. Two primers were used to measure the transcript at the location of shRNA targeting, exon 3 (Paired t-test, df=5, p-value=0.0001016***), and downstream, exon 6 (Paired t-test, df=5, p-value=2.725e-05***). Error bars represent mean C.I. C) XLR3 signal on the XY body is reduced in 17.5dpp spermatocytes. Protein levels were assessed by immunofluorescence of surface spread spermatocytes from shRNA-Xlr3 and age-matched wild type cells (Wilcox Test: W=646, p-value=1.019e-14****).

To verify specificity of the shRNA to Xlr3, we used qRT-PCR to assay mRNA levels of the most closely related Xlr family members, Xlr4 and Xlr5. Transcript levels of these genes were unaffected in the testis of shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic mice (Fig. S2B,C). To assess potential induction of a viral immune response due to the expression of double-stranded RNA in the transgenic mice, we assayed expression of 2’,5’-Oligoadenylate synthetase 1b (Oas1b), which is part of the interferon viral response pathway [22, 31, 32]. Again, there was no significant difference in transcript level of this gene, indicating our shRNA did not induce an interferon response (Fig. S2D). Taken together, these data indicate we have achieved specificity of the targeted shRNA to Xlr3 reduction in testes.

Supplementary Figure 2.
Supplementary Figure 2. Off-target effects as a result of shRNA-X/r3 activation were not observed.

A) Alignment and conservation of X/r3/4/5 mRNA sequences at the site of shRNA targeting generated by CLC Sequence Viewer 7 (Qiagen). B) X/r4 (T-test: t=-0.0217, df=11.953, p-value=0.983), C) X/r5 (T-test: t=-2.7428, df=10.204, p-value=0.7893), D) Oaslb (T-test: t=-0.68427, df=11, p-value=0.508), E) and Sox9 (T-test: t=0.44358, df=9.5631, p-value=0.6672) transcription levels as measured by qRT-PCR are not significantly (n.s) different between wild type and shRNA-X/r3 testis total cDNA. Error bars represent mean C.I.

Xlr3 knock down leads to germ cell loss and a skewed sex ratio

Initially, both male and female shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic mice appeared to be fully fertile, as they produced offspring with the same frequency and litter size as wild type sibling controls (Fig. 4A-B). However, a thorough examination of the transgenic males revealed a significant reduction in the sperm count (49.3% reduction) and normalized testes weight (14.7% reduction) at 14 weeks of age compared to wild type siblings (Fig. 4C-D). Histological cross-sections of the testes of shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic males revealed the presence of disorganized seminiferous tubules and a significant decrease in average tubule diameter (50% reduction) suggestive of either germ cell or Sertoli cell loss (Fig. 4E-G). To distinguish between these two possible causes of tubule defects, we assayed expression of the Sertoli cell marker, Sox9 (Rebourcet et al., 2014, 2017) to test for Sertoli cell loss. There was no difference in Sox9 expression between transgenic testis and wild type, suggesting Sertoli cell loss has not occurred (Fig. S2E). However, a twofold increase in germ cell apoptotic figures was observed in tubules of shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic males compared to wild type (Fig. 4H-J). Overall, the Xlr3 knock down leads to significant germ cell loss, but not to an extent to subvert fertility.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Xlr3 knock down mice are fertile but have spermatogenic defects.

A) Across 50 shRNA-Xlr3 sired litters, the number of pups produced per litter is not significantly (n.s.) different from that of wild type counterparts (Wilcox Test, W=135, p-value=0.7778) and B) there is no significant difference in the time to litter (T-test, t=0.2017, df=52.434, p-value=0.8409). C) Upon further examination of a cohort of 14-week old males, significantly reduced sperm count (Paired t-test, df=6.1897, p-value=0.0005***) was observed, as well as D) significantly reduced testis weight as percent of body weight (Paired t-test, df=6.8775, p-value=0.03966*). E,F) H&E staining revealed that shRNA-Xlr3 testes (F) have several disorganized seminiferous tubules, indicated by arrows, that are not present in any wild type section (E). G) The tubules of these mice are also significantly smaller in diameter than those of their wild type counterparts (T-test, df=9694, p-value=6.889e-06****). H-J) These phenotypes may be due to (H) an increased number of apoptotic cells per tubule (T-test, df=3, p-value=0.006456**), which was observed through TUNEL stained wild type (I) and shRNA-Xlr3 (J) testes. Apoptotic cells are stained dark brown. Error bars represent mean ± C.I. Scale bars = 20 μm.

During the course of fertility assessment, we observed a significant skew (60:40) towards female offspring produced by the shRNA-Xlr3 males across 400 individuals (Fig. 5A). To determine if sex chromosome nondisjunction (ND) events in the transgenic males were leading to excess daughters (i.e. Xmat monosomics), we mated shRNA-Xlr3 males on a C57BL/6J background to wild type C3H/HeJ females to trace the parental origin of the X chromosome via strain-specific sequence polymorphisms (Fig. 5B). While the same 60:40 skew toward females was observed in the inter-strain cross, only 2% of hybrid offspring were found to be 39,Xmat, attributable to sex chromosome ND (Fig. 5C). While this rate of ND is significantly higher compared to spontaneous events (0.01%) [33], ND does not fully account for the observed increase in female offspring, indicating the Xlr3 knockdown enhances X sperm or compromises Y sperm function.

Figure 5.
Figure 5. Xlr3 knock down alters offspring sex ratios and increases XY non-disjunction.

A) shRNA-Xlr3 males produce a significantly increased percentage of female offspring than expected (400 offspring, binomial distribution test, p=0.5, p-value=0.0003238) compared to the expected 50:50 sex ratio. B) To identify XY nondisjunction, shRNA-Xlr3/shRNA-Xlr3•C57 males were mated to wild type C3H females to use polymorphism genotyping. We observed the production of ~2% hybrid 39,X offspring (box). C) ND events (X monosomy) were identified by PCR and MseI restriction digest. Ladder (MW) is shown to the left and X-specific allele is indicated to the right.

Xlr3 knock down leads to disruption of meiotic sex chromosome inactivation

RNAi knockdown of the Xlr superfamily members Slx and Sly also leads to sex chromosome transmission distortion and either enhancement (Slx knockdown) or disruption (Sly knockdown) of normal transcriptional repression of post-meiotic sex chromatin (PMSC) [22, 25]. Given the localization of XLR3 to the XY body in pachynema, we examined the status of MSCI in shRNA-Xlr3 mice. To quantify changes in relative abundance of sex-linked transcripts, we assayed several genes by qRT-PCR at two time points. Since steady-state transcript levels are reflective of both transcriptional output and mRNA half-life, we determined potential changes in transcript levels in transgenics in reference to a normalized ratio of wild type transcript levels from 9.5dpp, the day before XLR3 protein is detected, and 14.5dpp, (Fig. 2B) the earliest point at which MSCI is detected [34]. We observed a statistically significant upregulation of several genes across the X chromosome (Rhox13, Hprt, Fmr1, Rps6ka6, Tcp11×2), as well as the “pachytene-lethal” Y-linked gene Zfy2 [10, 35] (Fig. 6A-B).

Figure 6.
Figure 6. Xlr3 knock down disrupts MSCI.

A) Map (ideogram of mm10) of X-linked targets. B) To detect transcript abundance of the X-linked targets and Zfy2 during pachytene (P) when the XY body should be silent, transcript levels from 9.5 dpp (leptotene, N=3) and 14.5 dpp (pachytene, N=3) testes were measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to those of age-matched wild type mice. All targets were significantly upregulated by the knock down of Xlr3 (One-sided T-test, Zfy2: t=-8.3929, df=2.4548, p-value=0.003624, Rhox13, t=-2.8488, df=2.1466, p-value=0.04812, Hprt, t=-4.2463, df=2.0958, p-value=0.02358, Fmr1, t=-40.279, df=2.9412, p-value=1.984e-05, Rps6ka6: t=-13.992, df=2.8365, p-value=0.0005269, Tcp11×2: t= −5.8356, df=2.5986, p-value=0.007383). C) RNA FISH of 17.5dpp spermatocytes using Fmr1 probe (yellow), γH2Ax as an XY body marker (magenta) and DAPI as a counterstain (grey). No overlap of Fmr1 and γH2Ax was observed in the wild type cells (top), while signal overlap was observed in the shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic cells (bottom). Far right panel is zoom of boxed inset shown in merge images. Scale bars = 6 μm.

Since qRT-PCR measures abundance of transcripts, but cannot differentiate between stable transcripts and those actively transcribed at any one time point, we used RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) to verify active transcription from the XY body during pachynema. Using a probe for Fmr1, one of the X-linked qRT-PCR targets (Fig. 6A-B), we confirmed there are no nascent transcripts observable within the XY body (0/40 cells) in wild type spermatocytes that maintain active MSCI regulation (Fig. 6C). However, approximately 50% of spermatocytes from shRNA-Xlr3 homozygotes showed colocalization of the Fmr1 signal with the γH2AX XY body marker (29/60 cells), indicative of MSCI disruption commensurate with the extent of Xlr3 knock down (Fig. 6C).

XLR3 marks the XY body to recruit DDR and chromatin regulators

Since XLR3 production and nuclear localization coincides with the appearance of DSBs in meiotic prophase I, it is important to place XLR3 localization to the XY body in relation to the sequential recruitment of DDR factors that bring about MSCI. BRCA1 recruitment to sex chromosome DSBs in late zygonema/early pachynema leads to localization of ATR kinase to sex chromosome axes (Turner et al., 2004). Subsequently, ATR translocates from the axes to chromatin loops in early to mid-pachynema where it phosphorylates H2AX [16, 17, 36], and is followed by the later accumulation of SUMO1 [37, 38], and H3K9me3 [18] by diplonema.

We assessed the sequential localization of XY body markers via ICC from later to earlier stages (from top to bottom Fig. 8). In late-pachytene spermatocytes (18.5 dpp) of the shRNA-Xlr3 males we detected a spectrum of signal intensity for SUMO1 (Fig.7A-C). While some spermatocytes showed staining equivalent to wild type, many in the same spreads showed severely diminished staining. The average corrected total fluorescence (CTF) of the anti-SUMO1 signal was half the intensity in shRNA-Xlr3 cells compared that of WT cells (Fig. 7A-C). Contrarily, the accumulation of H3K9me3 at the XY body, another late pachytene signal, was found to be elevated on average in shRNA-Xlr3 cells compared to wild type, again showing a spectrum of signal (Fig. 7D-F). These results suggest that XLR3 plays a role in regulating the epigenetic landscape of the XY body, resulting in higher levels of H3K9me3 at the XY body at the end of pachynema [18].

Figure 7.
Figure 7. XY body MSCI DDR factors and chromatin modifications are diminished in shRNA-Xlr3 pachytene spermatocytes.

Surface spread images were subjected to ICC with an antibody against SYCP3 (magenta). A-E) DDR factor signal intensity (yellow) in shRNA-Xlr3 spermatocytes is equal to that observed in wild type cells (left) and is diminished in some knockdown cells (middle). Overall, the average shRNA-Xlr3 population DDR signal corrected total fluorscence (CTF) were significantly decreased (right). A-C) SUMO1 signal across the XY body loops (Wilcox Test: W = 188, p-value = 0.000497***). D-F) H3K9me3 signal across the XY body loops (T test: t = 4.6677, df = 62.88, p-value = 1.644e-5***), G-I) γH2Ax signal across the XY body loops (Wilcox Test: W = 169, p-value = 5.298e-10****), J-L) ATR signal across the XY body axes and loops (Wilcox Test: W = 384, p-value = 5.713e-07****), M-O) BRCA1 signal across the XY body axes (Wilcox Test: W = 1575, p-value = 3.995e-05****). Images are deconvolved quick projections. Scale bars = 10 μm.

In mid-pachytene spermatocytes (16.5 dpp), the average signal intensity for γH2AX at the XY body in shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic mice is half that of wild type, again showing cell-to-cell differences from normal to weak staining (Fig. 7G-I). Likewise, ATR was observed to localize appropriately to the XY body, i.e. along the chromosomal axes and chromatin loops, but at approximately 50% average intensity in shRNA-Xlr3 compared to wild type cells (Fig. J-L). Finally, BRCA1, the earliest known mark on the XY body preceding recruitment of ATR to the XY body [17], localized to the chromosomal axes of the XY body in early pachytene spermatocytes (13.5 dpp) in both transgenic and WT testis, but at half the level in shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic cells compared to WT cells, again showing cell-to-cell differences in the knockdown (Fig. M-O). These results suggest that XLR3 localization is a necessary pre-condition for the recruitment of BRCA1 to the XY body, placing XLR3 as one of the earliest known factors leading to the demarcation of the XY body and the only known sex-linked factor essential in MSCI.

Discussion

The first identification of an X-linked lymphocyte regulated (Xlr) gene came from the isolation of a B lymphocyte expressed cDNA that was an early candidate for a mouse X-linked immunodeficiency syndrome (xid) [39]. Xlr (a.k.a. pM1) was ultimately dismissed as xid, but deeper genomic characterization of this multicopy gene led to the discovery of other Xlr homologs with broad expression profiles scattered across the murine X and Y [21, 40, 41]. The Xlr name, with a few exceptions, has largely persisted despite the recognition that SYCP3 is the ancestral source gene of this family [42, 43].

Sex-linked SYCP3-like genes can be found in the published genome sequences of a variety of eutherian mammals (e.g. Canis lupus familiaris LOC102152531). The broad distribution of these genes across Eutheria raises the question: Why have duplicate copies of SYCP3 moved to the sex chromosomes where they have multiplied and diversified in the course of eutherian divergence?

At least some members of the Xlr family seem to have evolved under the influence of sexual antagonism as suggested by functional studies of the Slx/Slxl1 and Sly genes [22, 25, 26, 44]. Slx/Slxl1 and Sly, X-linked and Y-linked respectively, are multicopy genes found in certain species of Mus that are expressed predominantly in post-meiotic spermatids [42, 45]. Using a shRNA transgenic approach, upon which ours was modeled, Cocquet and coworkers [22, 25] showed knockdown of Sly results in subfertility, a female-skewed sex ratio, and relaxation of PMSC leading to up-regulation of X-linked genes. Slx/Slxl1 knockdown males are also subfertile, but with the opposite effect observed in the Sly knockdown: PMSC repression is enhanced when Slx/Slxl1 expression is reduced, leading to inappropriate silencing of several otherwise active X-linked genes and an offspring sex ratio skewed toward males. Curiously, full fertility is restored in double knockdown males expressing both anti-Slx/Slxl1 and anti-Sly shRNAs [25], indicating that Y-linked copies are acting in conflict with X-linked copies [26]. Good and coworkers demonstrated that sterility in F1 hybrid males from the mating of two sub-species of Mus musculus is associated with a breakdown in PMSC, showing broad up-regulation of sex-linked genes [46]. The two sub-species differ significantly in copy number of the Slx/Sly genes; in hybrid males, the presence of a higher Slx copy number compared to Sly leads to the up-regulation of sex-linked genes, which is consistent with the induced Slx/Sly imbalance and PMSC failure in the knockdown model [25]. Recently, it was shown that SLX/SLXL1 compete with SLY in binding to the H3K4me3-reader, SSTY1, in spermatid nuclei, mediating their respective activities as transcriptional up-or down-regulators [26].

Unlike the Slx/Slxl1/Sly clusters, which are restricted to the genus Mus, the Xlr3/4/5 cluster appears to be more ancient, having homologs with shared local synteny in dog, pig and alpaca. The broad distribution of these genes across eutherian lineages and our observations that knockdown of Xlr3 results in disruption of BRCA1 and ATR localization to the XY body suggest a fundamental role for these genes in the initiation of MSCI in eutherian male meiosis.

Marsupials share a common origin for the sex chromosomes with Eutheria [47], and likewise share many features of MSCI in spermatogenesis, including formation of an XY body and localization of BRCA1 and ATR to the sex chromosomes early in meiotic prophase I [48, 49]. Unlike eutherians, the marsupial X and Y chromosomes lack a PAR and do not pair during meiosis I; no synaptonemal complex is formed but the sex chromosomes are held together within the XY body by an SYCP3-enriched structure called the “dense plate” [50]. The emergence of Xlr genes at the base of the eutherian lineage, therefore, suggests they were recruited into an established MSCI mechanism present in the therian common ancestor.

We envision two possible scenarios underlying the co-optation of a sex-linked SYCP3 duplicate, Xlr, into MSCI. Like Slx/Sly, the earliest Xlŕs could have evolved as a consequence of the persistent intragenomic conflict between the sex chromosomes [51, 52]. Supporting this scenario is the observation that knockdown of Xlr3 results in an offspring sex ratio skewed toward females (Fig. 5A). However, it is difficult to reconcile this result with the observation that knockdown of the only other X-linked Xlr members with known function, Slx/Slxl1, skews toward male offspring. In other words, normal Slx/Slxl1 function appears to drives X chromosome transmission, while normal Sly function drives Y transmission. Xlr3 appears to function more similarly to the Y-linked Sly, by promoting sex chromosome transcriptional silencing and, ostensibly, Y-chromosome transmission. While it is possible that Xlr3 evolved as a suppressor of X meiotic drive, it is more likely that the sex ratio skew resulting from Xlr3 knockdown is a byproduct of disrupted MSCI.

Alternatively, Xlr genes may have evolved to augment or adapt an ancestral therian MSCI mechanism to address an emergent feature of the sex chromosomes in Eutheria. The emergence of Xlr genes at the base of the eutherian lineage coincides with the addition of a large segment of autosomal DNA to the sex chromosomes after the divergence of Eutheria from Marsupialia [53, 54]. While this added segment likely paired initially, it is clear that the Y-borne segment underwent rapid attrition during the divergence of placental mammals [55]. We propose that Xlr3 evolved to accommodate silencing of the emergent unpaired sex chromosome DNA. The factors that govern meiotic silencing of unpaired chromatin (MSUC) are drawn from a limited pool and, hence, are highly dosage sensitive [56–58]. If unpaired chromatin exceeds a certain threshold, transcriptional silencing is disrupted, leading to meiocyte loss or the production of aneuploid gametes [14, 59]. Likewise, it is clear that, like SLX/SLXL1/SLY in PMSC, XLR3 involvement in MSCI is dosage sensitive. Our finding that ~50% knockdown of Xlr3 results in ~50% loss of sperm suggests that the compromised expression of Xlr3 in the shRNA transgenics lies at a critical threshold. If a minimal threshold of XLR3 expression is met, MSCI succeeds and meiocyte loss is averted; but if XLR3 levels are just below the threshold, MSCI is abrogated and the spermatocytes undergo apoptosis. Spermatocytes from shRNA-Xlr3 transgenic mice reveal a range of phenotypes that model these predictions: from cells with XY body MSCI marks well below the levels of wild type, likely contributing to the increased apoptotic figures observed; to cells with normal MSCI mark intensity that presumably go on to produce viable sperm (Fig. 4H-J, Fig. 7). It should be noted that the fact that Xlr3 genes are themselves subject to MSCI lends an additional dynamic to the phenotypic variance seen in the knockdown.

The apparent dosage sensitivity of Xlr family members may also offer an explanation for why one Xlr3 paralog, Xlr3b, is imprinted [28]. In females, the paternal allele of Xlr3b is repressed in both fetal and adult tissues, including ovary. Imprinting of the paternal copy of Xlr3b may serve to lower overall Xlr3 expression in oocytes below the threshold where it might induce chromatin silencing inappropriately. Aneuploid mouse models exhibiting unpaired chromatin in females and/or unpaired chromatin apart from the sex chromosomes in males may shed light on this hypothesis.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All mouse procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Connecticut.

Sequence homology and alignments

Sequences were downloaded from the PFAM database (Family: Cor1 [PF04803]). Percent identity matrices (PIMs) were generated using ClustalW. Protein domain alignments and corresponding graphics were generated using NCBI’s constraint-based multiple alignment tool (COBALT) [60]. The Xlr3/4/5 locus map was drawn to scale based on the UCSC genome browser view of identified regions (mm10).

Animal husbandry & transgenesis

Mice were housed under climate-controlled conditions with a 12-h light/dark cycle and provided standard food and water ad libitum. A floxed stop containing, short hairpin RNA (shRNA) complementary to all Xlr3 transcripts was cloned into the ROSA-PAS gene targeting vector [61]. This vector was electroporated into C57BL/6J (RRID:IMSR 000664) mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and targeted clones were screened by long range PCR and Southern analysis. Two independent clones (B2 and B11) were microinjected into B6(Cg)-Tyrc-2J/J (C57BL/6J albino) host embryos (RRID:IMSR JAX:000058). Germline transmission was achieved through multiple male chimaeras from clone B2, and a stable line was bred through three stable male founders by backcrossing with C57BL/6J wild-type female mice. All experiments were performed on the 6th to 13th generation, male and female offspring (Fig. S1). The C57BL/6J-Gt(ROSA)26Sor<tm1(shRNA:Xlr3)Lgr>/LgrJ mouse line will be available for distribution from The Jackson Laboratory as stock #034383. As described in Fig. S1, B6.Cg-Tg(Pgk1-flpo)10Sykr/J (RRID:IMSR 011065) and FVB-Tg(Ddx4-cre)1Dcas/J (RRID:IMSR 006954) were used in this study, along with C3H/HeJ (RRID:IMSR 000659) mice.

Tissue collection, testis weighing, and sperm counting

Tissues collected from euthanized mice were fixed as described in the following sections or snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Testis weights were taken from fresh tissue before freezing or fixation. Sperm counting was performed as described by Handel (Handel and O’Brien, https://phenome.jax.org/projects/Handel1/protocol).

PCR genotyping

DNA was extracted from ear punches by Proteinase K digestion. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1 with respective annealing temperatures. To amplify the shRNA-Xlr3 template, PrimeSTAR GXL (Clontech) enzyme system was used as per manufacturer instructions (cycling conditions: 98°C for 10s, 60°C for 15s and 68°C for 10s/kB – products 3-4kB for 30s and <1 kB for 10s, for 35 cycles). Products were visualized on 1% agarose Tris-acetate-EDTA gels. All other polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed using the GoTaq (Promega) enzyme system as per manufacturer instructions (95°C for 2 min, then 95°C for 30s, annealing as specified for 30s, 72°C for 1 min repeated for 35 cycles, then 72°C for 5 min) and products were visualized on 1-2% agarose and Tris-borate-EDTA gels.

View this table:
Supplementary Table 1.

Primers used in this study

Xlr3 antibody generation

The first 18 residues common to both XLR3A and XLR3B, and one amino acid difference from XLR3C, were used for peptide synthesis in rabbit immunization by Biosynthesis Inc. Following initial immunization, two rabbits received five biweekly boosters. Affinity purification of total IgG sera was performed using an AminoLink resin column (Thermo) and purified antibodies were complemented with pre-immune sera.

Western blotting

Whole testis lysate was made by homogenization in RIPA buffer (50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1mM EDTA, and 1mM PMSF), incubation on ice for 30 minutes, and centrifugation. Nuclear and cytoplasmic testis fractions were prepared from fresh tissue using a dounce homogenizer in Harvest Buffer (10mM HEPES pH 7.9, 25mM KCl, 2M sucrose, 1mM EDTA, 0.5mM spermidine, 1x protease inhibitor, 10% glycerol). Protein lysates were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare AmershamTM) using a Trans-Blot® SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell (BioRad). The membrane was blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), incubated in primary antibody overnight, followed by secondary antibody for 45 min. Signal was detected by chemiluminescence (Western Lightning, Perkin Elmer) on autoradiography film. Antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

View this table:
Supplementary Table 2.

Antibodies used in this study

Tissue fixation, sectioning, and staining

Testes were dissected from adult mice and fixed as described previously [62]. Paraffin embedding was performed by the University of Connecticut Veterinary and Medical Diagnostic Laboratory. Sections were sliced to 6 μm on a rotary microtome for slide mounting. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) regressive staining was performed with Modified Harris Hematoxylin and Eosin Y 1% stock solution (Ricca Chemical Company) and used following manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptosis detection was performed using the DeadEnd™ Colorimetric Apoptosis Detection System (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions for fixed tissue slides. Imaging was performed on a light field microscope at 10x magnification.

Spermatocyte chromosome spreads and immunocytochemistry

Spermatocyte spreads were made as previously described [63] with several modifications. Testes were dissected from 13.5-18.5 dpp mice, detunicated, and free tubules were suspended in 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Tubules were broken up and cells were released by needle disruption. A single cell suspension was made by putting the tubule mixture through a 70 μm filter. Cells were placed in hypotonic solution of 2x HEB, centrifuged, and resuspended in fixative (1% PFA, 0.15% Triton X-100, and 13 mM DTT). Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 3.4 M sucrose, then applied to slides under 50-75% humidity. Slides remained in humidity for approximately 2 hours to allow cells to spread, then were washed in 1x PBS, and air dried.

Spermatocyte spreads were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 and blocked with 10% goat serum. Slides were incubated with diluted primary antibody at 4°C overnight and subsequently with diluted secondary antibody at 4°C for 30 minutes. Antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2. 4’6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) diluted 1:5 in Vectashield mounting media (Vector Labs) was used as a counterstain. Imaging was performed using an oil-immersion 100x objective of the Olympus IX 71 (DeltaVision) fluorescent microscope with DAPI, FITC, and TRITC channels. Images were captured and deconvolved using the softWoRx software (Applied Precision, LLC). Exposure times were set for particular antibody combinations and maintained for all slides imaged. Quantification of signal was accomplished by outlining cells and signals to take area and intensity measurements using ImageJ (Schindelin et al., 2015). Corrected total fluorescence (CTF) was calculated using the following formula: Embedded Image

RNA isolation and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA was extracted from frozen tissue using the NucleoSpin RNA kit (Machery-Nagel) as described by the manufacturer. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using the QSCRIPT cDNA Supermix (Quanta Biosciences) and qRT-PCR was carried out in triplicate using the iTAQ Universal SYBR Green SuperMix (BioRad). Primers for these reactions are listed in Supplementary Table 1 and all reactions were carried out under the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 mins, 40 cycles (95°C for 5 sec 58°C for 30 sec), a final extension of 65°C for 5 sec. CT and melting curve results were calculated by the CFX Manager 3.1 software (BioRad). Results were normalized to β-actin or Gapdh using the ΔΔCt method [64].

RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

RNA FISH was performed as described by [65]. Probes were generated using primers listed in Supplementary Table 1 from the G135P65476A4 BAC as described in [8] and were labeled using the DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Following RNA FISH, slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for IF as above.

Graphical and statistical data presentation

All boxplot and bar graphs were produced using Rstudio (Rstudio Team, 2020). In the case of bar graphs, all error bars represent the mean ± confidence interval (CI). In the case of boxplots, unfilled dots represent outliers and colored dots represent individual observations. Normal data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To determine statistical significance, if data were normally distributed, a T-test was applied; if data were not normally distributed, a Wilcox Test was applied. All sample sizes are indicated with the relevant tests.

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the M.O’Neill and R.O’Neill laboratories for their discussion and helpful comments. Thank you to R. O’Neill for critical evaluation of the manuscript, N. Pauloski and C. McCann with microscopy. Thank you to Dr. Satoshi Namekawa for the gift of the anti-BRCA1 antibody used in this study.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Ichijima Y, Sin H, Namekawa S. Sex chromosome inactivation in germ cells: emerging roles of DNA damage response pathways. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(15):2559–72. Epub 2012/03/03. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0941-5. PubMed PMID: 22382926; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3744831.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Turner J, Mahadevaiah S, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, Deng C, et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2005;37(1):41–7. Epub 2004/12/08. doi: 10.1038/ng1484. PubMed PMID: 15580272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Schimenti J. Synapsis or silence. Nat Genet. 2005;37(1):11–3. Epub 2004/12/30. doi: 10.1038/ng0105-11. PubMed PMID: 15624015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP. The Eutherian Pseudoautosomal Region. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;147(2-3):81–94. Epub 2016/01/06. doi: 10.1159/000443157. PubMed PMID: 26730606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Solari A. The behavior of the XY pair in mammals. Int Rev Cytol. 1974;38(0):273–317. Epub 1974/01/01. PubMed PMID: 4854664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Lu L, Yu X. Double-strand break repair on sex chromosomes: challenges during male meiotic prophase. Cell Cycle. 2015;14(4):516–25. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2014.998070. PubMed PMID: 25565522; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4614871.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Namekawa SH, Park PJ, Zhang LF, Shima JE, McCarrey JR, Griswold MD, et al. Postmeiotic sex chromatin in the male germline of mice. Curr Biol. 2006;16(7):660–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.066. PubMed PMID: 16581510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Mueller J, Mahadevaiah S, Park P, Warburton P, Page D, Turner J. The mouse X chromosome is enriched for multicopy testis genes showing postmeiotic expression. Nat Genet. 2008;40(6):794–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.126. PubMed PMID: 18454149; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2740655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Sin H, Ichijima Y, Koh E, Namiki M, Namekawa S. Human postmeiotic sex chromatin and its impact on sex chromosome evolution. Genome Res. 2012;22(5):827–36. Epub 2012/03/01. doi: 10.1101/gr.135046.111. PubMed PMID: 22375025; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3337429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Turner J. Meiotic Silencing in Mammals. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:395–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055145. PubMed PMID: 26631513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Yuan L, Liu JG, Zhao J, Brundell E, Daneholt B, Höög C. The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol Cell. 2000;5(1):73–83. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80404-9. PubMed PMID: 10678170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Yang F, De La Fuente R, Leu NA, Baumann C, McLaughlin KJ, Wang PJ. Mouse SYCP2 is required for synaptonemal complex assembly and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol. 2006;173(4):497–507. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603063. PubMed PMID: 16717126; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2063860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    MacQueen AJ, Hochwagen A. Checkpoint mechanisms: the puppet masters of meiotic prophase. Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 21(7):393–400. Epub 2011/04/29. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.004. PubMed PMID: 21531561.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    ElInati E, Russell HR, Ojarikre OA, Sangrithi M, Hirota T, de Rooij DG, et al. DNA damage response protein TOPBP1 regulates X chromosome silencing in the mammalian germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(47):12536–41. Epub 2017/11/07. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712530114. PubMed PMID: 29114052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5703310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    Fedoriw A, Menon D, Kim Y, Mu W, Magnuson T. Key mediators of somatic ATR signaling localize to unpaired chromosomes in spermatocytes. Development. 2015;142(17):2972–80. Epub 2015/07/26. doi: 10.1242/dev.126078. PubMed PMID: 26209650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4582186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Royo H, Prosser H, Ruzankina Y, Mahadevaiah S, Cloutier J, Baumann M, et al. ATR acts stage specifically to regulate multiple aspects of mammalian meiotic silencing. Genes Dev. 2013;27(13):1484–94. doi: 10.1101/gad.219477.113. PubMed PMID: 23824539; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3713429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Turner J, Aprelikova O, Xu X, Wang R, Kim S, Chandramouli G, et al. BRCA1, histone H2AX phosphorylation, and male meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol. 2004;14(23):2135–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.032. PubMed PMID: 15589157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Kato Y, Alavattam KG, Sin HS, Meetei AR, Pang Q, Andreassen PR, et al. FANCB is essential in the male germline and regulates H3K9 methylation on the sex chromosomes during meiosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(18):5234–49. Epub 2015/06/29. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv244. PubMed PMID: 26123487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4550819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Fraune J, Brochier-Armanet C, Alsheimer M, Volff JN, Schücker K, Benavente R. Evolutionary history of the mammalian synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma. 2016;125(3):355–60. Epub 2016/03/12. doi: 10.1007/s00412-016-0583-8. PubMed PMID: 26968413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Garchon H, Davis M. The XLR gene product defines a novel set of proteins stabilized in the nucleus by zinc ions. J Cell Biol. 1989;108(3):779–87. PubMed PMID: 2493459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Bergsagel P, Timblin C, Kozak C, Kuehl W. Sequence and expression of murine cDNAs encoding Xlr3a and Xlr3b, defining a new X-linked lymphocyte-regulated Xlr gene subfamily. Gene. 1994;150(2):345–50. PubMed PMID: 7821804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Cocquet J, Ellis P, Yamauchi Y, Mahadevaiah S, Affara N, Ward M, et al. The multicopy gene Sly represses the sex chromosomes in the male mouse germline after meiosis. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(11):e1000244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000244. PubMed PMID: 19918361; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2770110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    Cocquet J, Ellis P, Yamauchi Y, Riel J, Karacs T, Rattigan A, et al. Deficiency in the multicopy Sycp3-like X-linked genes Slx and Slxl1 causes major defects in spermatid differentiation. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(20):3497–505. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0601. PubMed PMID: 20739462; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2954115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Martinez-Garay I, Jablonka S, Sutajova M, Steuernagel P, Gal A, Kutsche K. A new gene family (FAM9) of low-copy repeats in Xp22.3 expressed exclusively in testis: implications for recombinations in this region. Genomics. 2002;80(3):259–67. PubMed PMID: 12213195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Cocquet J, Ellis P, Mahadevaiah S, Affara N, Vaiman D, Burgoyne P. A genetic basis for a postmeiotic X versus Y chromosome intragenomic conflict in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(9):e1002900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002900. PubMed PMID: 23028340; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3441658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Moretti C, Blanco M, Ialy-Radio C, Serrentino ME, Gobé C, Friedman R, et al. Battle of the Sex Chromosomes: Competition between X and Y Chromosome-Encoded Proteins for Partner Interaction and Chromatin Occupancy Drives Multicopy Gene Expression and Evolution in Muroid Rodents. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37(12):3453–68. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa175. PubMed PMID: 32658962; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7743899.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Larson E, Keeble S, Vanderpool D, Dean M, Good J. The Composite Regulatory Basis of the Large X-Effect in Mouse Speciation. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(2):282–95. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw243. PubMed PMID: 27999113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Raefski A, O’Neill M. Identification of a cluster of X-linked imprinted genes in mice. Nat Genet. 2005;37(6):620–4. PubMed PMID: 15908953.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Syrjänen JL, Pellegrini L, Davies OR. A molecular model for the role of SYCP3 in meiotic chromosome organisation. Elife. 2014;3. Epub 2014/06/20. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02963. PubMed PMID: 24950965; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4102245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Gallardo T, Shirley L, John GB, Castrillon DH. Generation of a germ cell-specific mouse transgenic Cre line, Vasa-Cre. Genesis. 2007;45(6):413–7. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20310. PubMed PMID: 17551945; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2597027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Pebernard S, Iggo RD. Determinants of interferon-stimulated gene induction by RNAi vectors. Differentiation. 2004;72(2-3):103–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2004.07202001.x. PubMed PMID: 15066190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Sledz CA, Holko M, de Veer MJ, Silverman RH, Williams BR. Activation of the interferon system by short-interfering RNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5(9):834–9. Epub 2003/08/24. doi: 10.1038/ncb1038. PubMed PMID: 12942087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Russell LB. Meiotic nondisjunction in the mouse: methodology for genetic testing and comparison with other methods. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;31:113–28. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7931113. PubMed PMID: 387392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1637639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Ball RL, Fujiwara Y, Sun F, Hu J, Hibbs MA, Handel MA, et al. Regulatory complexity revealed by integrated cytological and RNA-seq analyses of meiotic substages in mouse spermatocytes. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):628. Epub 2016/08/12. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2865-1. PubMed PMID: 27519264; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4983049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Vernet N, Mahadevaiah SK, de Rooij DG, Burgoyne PS, Ellis PJI. Zfy genes are required for efficient meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) in spermatocytes. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(24):5300–10. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw344. PubMed PMID: 27742779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5418838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah S, Celeste A, Romanienko P, Camerini-Otero R, Bonner W, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4(4):497–508. PubMed PMID: 12689589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Rogers R, Inselman A, Handel M, Matunis M. SUMO modified proteins localize to the XY body of pachytene spermatocytes. Chromosoma. 2004;113(5):233–43. PubMed PMID: 15349788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Vigodner M, Morris PL. Testicular expression of small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) supports multiple roles in spermatogenesis: silencing of sex chromosomes in spermatocytes, spermatid microtubule nucleation, and nuclear reshaping. Dev Biol. 2005;282(2):480–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.034. PubMed PMID: 15950612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Cohen D, Hedrick S, Nielsen E, D’Eustachio P, Ruddle F, Steinberg A, et al. Isolation of a cDNA clone corresponding to an X-linked gene family (XLR) closely linked to the murine immunodeficiency disorder xid. Nature. 1985;314(6009):369–72. PubMed PMID: 2984575.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Calenda A, Allenet B, Escalier D, Bach J, Garchon H. The meiosis-specific Xmr gene product is homologous to the lymphocyte Xlr protein and is a component of the XY body. Embo J. 1994;13(1):100–9. PubMed PMID: 8306953.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Garchon H, Loh E, Ho W, Amar L, Avner P, Davis M. The XLR sequence family: dispersion on the X and Y chromosomes of a large set of closely related sequences, most of which are pseudogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(23):9871–88. PubMed PMID: 2602144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Reynard LN, Turner JM, Cocquet J, Mahadevaiah SK, Touré A, Höög C, et al. Expression analysis of the mouse multi-copy X-linked gene Xlr-related, meiosis-regulated (Xmr), reveals that Xmr encodes a spermatid-expressed cytoplasmic protein, SLX/XMR. Biol Reprod. 2007;77(2):329–35. Epub 2007/05/02. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.061101. PubMed PMID: 17475928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Toure A, Clemente E, Ellis P, Mahadevaiah S, Ojarikre O, Ball P, et al. Identification of novel Y chromosome encoded transcripts by testis transcriptome analysis of mice with deletions of the Y chromosome long arm. Genome Biol. 2005;6(12):R102. PubMed PMID: 16356265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Good JM. The conflict within and the escalating war between the sex chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(9):e1002955. Epub 2012/09/13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002955. PubMed PMID: 23028362; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3441667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Zhuang XJ, Hou XJ, Liao SY, Wang XX, Cooke HJ, Zhang M, et al. SLXL1, a novel acrosomal protein, interacts with DKKL1 and is involved in fertilization in mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20866. Epub 2011/06/15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020866. PubMed PMID: 21698294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3115956.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Larson E, Vanderpool D, Keeble S, Zhou M, Sarver B, Smith A, et al. Contrasting Levels of Molecular Evolution on the Mouse X Chromosome. Genetics. 2016;203(4):1841–57. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.186825. PubMed PMID: 27317678; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4981281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Graves J. Evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and dosage compensation. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(1):33–46. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.2. PubMed PMID: 26616198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    Franco MJ, Sciurano RB, Solari AJ. Protein immunolocalization supports the presence of identical mechanisms of XY body formation in eutherians and marsupials. Chromosome Res. 2007;15(6):815–24. Epub 2007/09/13. doi: 10.1007/s10577-007-1165-7. PubMed PMID: 17846907.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Namekawa SH, VandeBerg JL, McCarrey JR, Lee JT. Sex chromosome silencing in the marsupial male germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9730–5. Epub 2007/05/29. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700323104. PubMed PMID: 17535928; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1887598.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Page J, Viera A, Parra MT, de la Fuente R, Suja JA, Prieto I, et al. Involvement of synaptonemal complex proteins in sex chromosome segregation during marsupial male meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(8):e136. Epub 2006/07/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020136. PubMed PMID: 16934004; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1557784.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    Mank JE, Hosken DJ, Wedell N. Conflict on the sex chromosomes: cause, effect, and complexity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(12):a017715. Epub 2014/10/03. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017715. PubMed PMID: 25280765; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4292157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Meiklejohn CD, Tao Y. Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(4):215–23. Epub 2009/11/26. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.005. PubMed PMID: 19931208; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2843792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Lahn BT, Page DC. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science. 1999;286(5441):964–7. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5441.964. PubMed PMID: 10542153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Wilcox SA, Watson JM, Spencer JA, Graves JA. Comparative mapping identifies the fusion point of an ancient mammalian X-autosomal rearrangement. Genomics. 1996;35(1):66–70. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0323. PubMed PMID: 8661105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Cortez D, Marin R, Toledo-Flores D, Froidevaux L, Liechti A, Waters PD, et al. Origins and functional evolution of Y chromosomes across mammals. Nature. 2014;508(7497):488–93. doi: 10.1038/nature13151. PubMed PMID: 24759410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    Homolka D, Ivanek R, Capkova J, Jansa P, Forejt J. Chromosomal rearrangement interferes with meiotic X chromosome inactivation. Genome Res. 2007;17(10):1431–7. Epub 2007/08/23. doi: 10.1101/gr.6520107. PubMed PMID: 17717048; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1987340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.
    Kouznetsova A, Wang H, Bellani M, Camerini-Otero R, Jessberger R, Hoog C. BRCA1-mediated chromatin silencing is limited to oocytes with a small number of asynapsed chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 14):2446–52. doi: 10.1242/jcs.049353. PubMed PMID: 19531582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc’his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, Burgoyne PS. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182(2):263–76. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710195. PubMed PMID: 18663141; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2483523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    Ichijima Y, Ichijima M, Lou Z, Nussenzweig A, Camerini-Otero R, Chen J, et al. MDC1 directs chromosome-wide silencing of the sex chromosomes in male germ cells. Genes Dev. 2011;25(9):959–71. doi: 10.1101/gad.2030811. PubMed PMID: 21536735; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3084029.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R. COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(9):1073–9. Epub 2007/03/01. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm076. PubMed PMID: 17332019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet. 1999;21(1):70–1. doi: 10.1038/5007. PubMed PMID: 9916792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    Wang H, Yang LL, Ji YL, Chen YH, Hu J, Zhang C, et al. Different fixative methods influence histological morphology and TUNEL staining in mouse testes. Reprod Toxicol. 2016;60:53–61. Epub 2016/01/25. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.01.006. PubMed PMID: 26820454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 1997;5(1):66–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1018445520117. PubMed PMID: 9088645.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. 64.↵
    Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. PubMed PMID: 18546601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.↵
    Mahadevaiah SK, Costa Y, Turner JM. Using RNA FISH to study gene expression during mammalian meiosis. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:433–44. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_25. PubMed PMID: 19685339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted March 30, 2021.
Download PDF
Email
Deficiency of SYCP3-related XLR3 disrupts the initiation of meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in mouse spermatogenesis
Natali Sobel Naveh, Robert J. Foley, Katelyn R. DeNegre, Tristan C. Evans, Anne Czechanski, Laura G. Reinholdt, Michael J. O’Neill
bioRxiv 2021.03.30.437712; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.30.437712
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area