Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Is it that simple? Linear mapping models in cognitive neuroscience

View ORCID ProfileAnna A. Ivanova, View ORCID ProfileMartin Schrimpf, Stefano Anzellotti, Noga Zaslavsky, View ORCID ProfileEvelina Fedorenko, View ORCID ProfileLeyla Isik
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.02.438248
Anna A. Ivanova
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
2McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna A. Ivanova
  • For correspondence: annaiv@mit.edu
Martin Schrimpf
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
2McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
5Center for Brains, Minds and Machines, MIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Schrimpf
Stefano Anzellotti
3Department of Psychology, Boston College
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noga Zaslavsky
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
5Center for Brains, Minds and Machines, MIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelina Fedorenko
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
2McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Evelina Fedorenko
Leyla Isik
4Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leyla Isik
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Advances in cognitive neuroscience are often accompanied by an increased complexity in the methods we use to uncover new aspects of brain function. Recently, many studies have started to use large feature sets to predict and interpret brain activity patterns. Of crucial importance in this paradigm is the mapping model, which defines the space of possible relationships between the features and neural data. Until recently, most encoding and decoding studies have used linear mapping models. However, some researchers have argued that the space of linear mappings is overly constrained and advocated for the use of more flexible nonlinear mapping models. Here, we discuss the choice of a mapping model in the context of three overarching goals: predictive accuracy, interpretability, and biological plausibility. We show that, contrary to popular intuition, these goals do not map cleanly onto the linear/nonlinear divide. Moreover, we argue that, instead of categorically treating the mapping models as linear or nonlinear, we should instead aim to estimate the complexity of these models. We show that, in most cases, complexity provides a more accurate reflection of restrictions imposed by various research goals and outline several complexity metrics that can be used to effectively evaluate mapping models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 04, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is it that simple? Linear mapping models in cognitive neuroscience
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Is it that simple? Linear mapping models in cognitive neuroscience
Anna A. Ivanova, Martin Schrimpf, Stefano Anzellotti, Noga Zaslavsky, Evelina Fedorenko, Leyla Isik
bioRxiv 2021.04.02.438248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.02.438248
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Is it that simple? Linear mapping models in cognitive neuroscience
Anna A. Ivanova, Martin Schrimpf, Stefano Anzellotti, Noga Zaslavsky, Evelina Fedorenko, Leyla Isik
bioRxiv 2021.04.02.438248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.02.438248

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3688)
  • Biochemistry (7783)
  • Bioengineering (5673)
  • Bioinformatics (21267)
  • Biophysics (10574)
  • Cancer Biology (8170)
  • Cell Biology (11929)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6757)
  • Ecology (10394)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13853)
  • Genetics (9702)
  • Genomics (13063)
  • Immunology (8136)
  • Microbiology (19976)
  • Molecular Biology (7841)
  • Neuroscience (43032)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1278)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2258)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7221)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1311)
  • Synthetic Biology (2000)
  • Systems Biology (5533)
  • Zoology (1127)