Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A secreted proteomic footprint for stem cell pluripotency

View ORCID ProfilePhilip Lewis, View ORCID ProfileEdina Silajzick, Helen Smith, View ORCID ProfileNicola Bates, Christopher A Smith, David Knight, View ORCID ProfileChris Denning, Daniel R Brison, Susan J Kimber
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.439804
Philip Lewis
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
4Current address: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip Lewis
  • For correspondence: pl17644@bristol.ac.uk
Edina Silajzick
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
5Current address: Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Edina Silajzick
Helen Smith
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Bates
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicola Bates
Christopher A Smith
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Knight
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Denning
2Biodiscovery Institute, Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Denning
Daniel R Brison
4Current address: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan J Kimber
1Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

With a view to developing a much-needed non-invasive method for monitoring the healthy pluripotent state of human stem cells in culture, we undertook proteomic analysis of the spent medium from cultured embryonic (Man-13) and induced (Rebl.PAT) human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Cells were grown in E8 medium to maintain pluripotency, and then transferred to FGF2 and TGFβ deficient media for 48 hours to replicate an early, undirected dissolution of pluripotency.

We identified a distinct proteomic footprint associated with early loss of pluripotency in both hPSC lines, and a strong correlation with changes in the transcriptome. We demonstrate that multiplexing of 4 E8- against 4 E6- enriched biomarkers provides 16 ratio abundances which are each robustly diagnostic for pluripotent state. These biomarkers were further confirmed by Western blotting which demonstrated consistent correlation with the pluripotent state across cell lines, and in response to recovery assays.

Competing Interest Statement

Susan Kimber and Philip Lewis are inventors on a pending patent based upon the works in the paper.

Footnotes

  • Clarified Figure 5 legend language.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 11, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A secreted proteomic footprint for stem cell pluripotency
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A secreted proteomic footprint for stem cell pluripotency
Philip Lewis, Edina Silajzick, Helen Smith, Nicola Bates, Christopher A Smith, David Knight, Chris Denning, Daniel R Brison, Susan J Kimber
bioRxiv 2021.04.14.439804; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.439804
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A secreted proteomic footprint for stem cell pluripotency
Philip Lewis, Edina Silajzick, Helen Smith, Nicola Bates, Christopher A Smith, David Knight, Chris Denning, Daniel R Brison, Susan J Kimber
bioRxiv 2021.04.14.439804; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.439804

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cell Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3686)
  • Biochemistry (7782)
  • Bioengineering (5673)
  • Bioinformatics (21257)
  • Biophysics (10565)
  • Cancer Biology (8165)
  • Cell Biology (11917)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6748)
  • Ecology (10392)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13847)
  • Genetics (9699)
  • Genomics (13061)
  • Immunology (8133)
  • Microbiology (19975)
  • Molecular Biology (7840)
  • Neuroscience (43004)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1276)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2257)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7218)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1309)
  • Synthetic Biology (2000)
  • Systems Biology (5529)
  • Zoology (1126)