ABSTRACT
Plant and animal populations are facing several novel risks such as human-mediated habitat fragmentation and climate change that threaten their long-term productivity and persistence. With the genetic health of many populations deteriorating due to climate change outpacing physiological adaptation, human interventions in the form of assisted gene flow (AGF) may provide genetic variation to adapt populations to predicted climate change scenarios and result in more robust and productive populations. We ran genetic simulations to mimic a variety of AGF scenarios and measured their outcomes on population-level fitness to answer the question: in which circumstances is it worthwhile to perform AGF? Based on the parameters we explored, AGF may be harmful in certain situations over the short term (e.g., the first ∼10-20 generations), due to outbreeding depression and introducing deleterious genetic variation. Moreover, under many parameter sets, the benefits of AGF were relatively weak or took many generations to accrue. In general, when the adaptive trait is controlled by many loci of small effect, the benefits of assisted gene flow take much longer to realize–potentially too long for most climate-related management decisions. We also show that when translocation effort is divided across several generations and outbreeding depression is strong, the recipient population experiences a smaller decrease in fitness as compared to moving all individuals in a single effort. Importantly, in most cases, we show that the genomic integrity of the recipient population remains relatively intact following AGF; the amount of genetic material from the donor population typically ends up constituting no more of the recipient population’s genome than the fraction introduced. Our results will be useful for conservation practitioners and silviculturists, for instance, aiming to intervene and adaptively manage so that populations maintain a robust genetic health and maintain productivity into the future given anthropogenic climate change.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.