Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Accuracy and Precision of Social Relationship Indices

View ORCID ProfileAlexander Mielke, View ORCID ProfileLiran Samuni
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.25.441321
Alexander Mielke
1Primate Models for Behavioural Evolution Lab, University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander Mielke
  • For correspondence: mielke.alexand@gmail.com
Liran Samuni
2Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Liran Samuni
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Combining interaction rates of different social behaviours into social relationship indices to represent the structure of dyadic relationships on one underlying dimension is common practice in animal sociality studies. However, the properties of these relationship indices are not well explored – mainly because, for real-world social systems, the ‘true’ value of relationships is unobservable. Here, we use simulation studies to estimate the accuracy and precision of three relationship indices: the Dyadic Composite Sociality Index, the Composite Relationship Index, and the Dynamic Dyadic Sociality Index. We simulated one year of social interactions for multiple groups of 25 individuals and 4 interaction types with different properties, and tested the impact of different focal follow regimes, data densities and sampling conditions on the representation of social relationships. Accuracy and precision of social relationship indices were strongly driven by sample size, similar to simple interaction rates. Under the assumption that there was a clear, one-dimensional relationship underlying interactions, and that different interaction types constituting an index were highly correlated, indices indeed increased accuracy over single interaction rates for small sample sizes. Including uninformative constituting behaviours (i.e., those not highly correlated with the underlying relationship dimension) reduced the accuracy of all indices. The precision of each index (i.e., whether multiple simulated focal follow regimes achieve the same dyadic values for the same data) was generally poor and was driven by the precision of the least precise constituting behaviour, making them less precise than some single interaction rates. Our results showed that social relationship indices do not remove the need to have sufficient data for each individual constituting interaction type. Index quality was defined by the least accurate and precise constituting interaction type. Indices might only be useful if all constituting interaction rates are highly correlated and if there are clear indications that one dimension is sufficient to represent social relationships in a group.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://github.com/AlexMielke1988/Social_Relationship_Simulations

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 26, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accuracy and Precision of Social Relationship Indices
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Accuracy and Precision of Social Relationship Indices
Alexander Mielke, Liran Samuni
bioRxiv 2021.04.25.441321; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.25.441321
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Accuracy and Precision of Social Relationship Indices
Alexander Mielke, Liran Samuni
bioRxiv 2021.04.25.441321; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.25.441321

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Zoology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4382)
  • Biochemistry (9591)
  • Bioengineering (7090)
  • Bioinformatics (24858)
  • Biophysics (12610)
  • Cancer Biology (9956)
  • Cell Biology (14350)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7948)
  • Ecology (12105)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15988)
  • Genetics (10925)
  • Genomics (14738)
  • Immunology (9869)
  • Microbiology (23660)
  • Molecular Biology (9484)
  • Neuroscience (50860)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1539)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2682)
  • Physiology (4013)
  • Plant Biology (8657)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1508)
  • Synthetic Biology (2394)
  • Systems Biology (6433)
  • Zoology (1346)