Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Reinforcement alone does not explain increased reproductive isolation in sympatry

Daniel R. Matute, Brandon S. Cooper
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.442525
Daniel R. Matute
*Biology Department, University of North Carolina, 250 Bell Tower Drive, Genome Sciences Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27510
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dmatute@email.unc.edu
Brandon S. Cooper
†Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr. Missoula, MT 59812
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Comparative studies of reproductive isolation (RI) by Coyne and Orr (1, 2) and others indicate a significant role for reinforcing natural selection in Drosophila speciation. The reinforcement hypothesis predicts increased prezygotic, but not postzygotic, RI between sympatric species pairs in response to maladaptive hybridization. We revisit this hypothesis and others using additional Drosophila, Lepidopteran, and toad (Bufo) data. In contrast to the predictions of reinforcement, we find increased premating and postzygotic RI between sympatric Drosophila species, including between recently diverged species pairs, as defined by Coyne and Orr (1) and others (i.e., DNei < 0.5). However, at slightly lower divergence thresholds increased postzygotic RI in sympatry is not statistically significant, while increased premating RI is, generally in agreement with the predictions of reinforcement. While premating data are unavailable, postzygotic RI is also increased between sympatric Lepidopteran and toad (Bufo) species. We find only modest support for “concordant asymmetries” in premating and postzygotic RI between sympatric Drosophila, described by others as uniquely supporting reinforcement. Finally, the proportion of geographic range overlap shared by species is positively associated with the magnitude of premating RI as predicted by reinforcement, but it is also positively associated with postzygotic RI, which cannot be explained by reinforcement. Taken together, our results demonstrate that comparisons of premating and postzygotic RI in sympatry depend greatly on divergence time, and suggest that fusion, extinction, and/or other mechanisms must combine with reinforcement to generate these patterns.

Significance Statement Understanding mechanisms underlying the origin of species remains a central goal of biology. By combining laboratory estimates of premating and postzygotic reproductive isolation (RI) with phylogenetic hypotheses, geographic range data, and genetic divergence estimates, the fundamental meta-analyses of Coyne and Orr provided compelling support that reinforcement contributes significantly to Drosophila speciation. Using additional Drosophila data, we demonstrate increased premating and postzygotic RI in sympatry. Postzygotic RI is also increased in sympatry between Lepidopteran and toad species. We also find only modest support for patterns previously described as uniquely supporting reinforcement. Together, our analyses demonstrate that comparisons of premating and postzygotic RI depend on divergence time, and suggest that fusion, extinction, and/or other mechanisms combine with reinforcement to produce these patterns.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • brandon.cooper{at}umontana.edu

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 06, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reinforcement alone does not explain increased reproductive isolation in sympatry
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reinforcement alone does not explain increased reproductive isolation in sympatry
Daniel R. Matute, Brandon S. Cooper
bioRxiv 2021.05.06.442525; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.442525
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reinforcement alone does not explain increased reproductive isolation in sympatry
Daniel R. Matute, Brandon S. Cooper
bioRxiv 2021.05.06.442525; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.06.442525

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3689)
  • Biochemistry (7789)
  • Bioengineering (5674)
  • Bioinformatics (21282)
  • Biophysics (10576)
  • Cancer Biology (8173)
  • Cell Biology (11937)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6762)
  • Ecology (10401)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13863)
  • Genetics (9708)
  • Genomics (13070)
  • Immunology (8139)
  • Microbiology (19983)
  • Molecular Biology (7842)
  • Neuroscience (43053)
  • Paleontology (319)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2258)
  • Physiology (3351)
  • Plant Biology (7232)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1312)
  • Synthetic Biology (2004)
  • Systems Biology (5537)
  • Zoology (1128)