Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Morph-specific investment in testes mass in a trimorphic beetle, Proagoderus watanabei

Jonathan M. Parrett, View ORCID ProfileEleanor M. Slade, View ORCID ProfileRobert J. Knell
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.09.443318
Jonathan M. Parrett
1Evolutionary Biology Group, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61–614, Poznań, Poland
2School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleanor M. Slade
3Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore City 639798, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eleanor M. Slade
Robert J. Knell
2School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert J. Knell
  • For correspondence: r.knell@qmul.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

When competition between males for mates is intense it is common to find that some males will adopt alternative tactics for acquiring fertilisations, often involving the use of ‘sneak’ tactics whereby males avoid contests. These alternative tactics are sometimes associated with discrete differences in male morphology, with sneak males investing less in weaponry but more in traits such as testes which will give an advantage in sperm competition. In some cases it appears that males develop into more than two morphs, with a number of examples of tri- and even tetramorphic arthropod species being described. Here we analyse the scaling relations of the dung beetle species Proagoderus watanabei, which expresses two distinct weapon traits: paired head horns and a pronotal horn. We find that males of this species are trimorphic, with alpha males expressing long head horns and a pronotal horn, beta males with long head horns but no pronotal horn, and gamma males with short head horns only. We also find that alpha males invest less in testes than do beta or gamma males, indicating that beta and gamma males in this species probably experience higher risks of sperm competition than do alphas.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://zenodo.org/record/3342495

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 10, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Morph-specific investment in testes mass in a trimorphic beetle, Proagoderus watanabei
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Morph-specific investment in testes mass in a trimorphic beetle, Proagoderus watanabei
Jonathan M. Parrett, Eleanor M. Slade, Robert J. Knell
bioRxiv 2021.05.09.443318; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.09.443318
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Morph-specific investment in testes mass in a trimorphic beetle, Proagoderus watanabei
Jonathan M. Parrett, Eleanor M. Slade, Robert J. Knell
bioRxiv 2021.05.09.443318; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.09.443318

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3479)
  • Biochemistry (7318)
  • Bioengineering (5296)
  • Bioinformatics (20196)
  • Biophysics (9976)
  • Cancer Biology (7703)
  • Cell Biology (11250)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6417)
  • Ecology (9916)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13280)
  • Genetics (9352)
  • Genomics (12552)
  • Immunology (7674)
  • Microbiology (18939)
  • Molecular Biology (7417)
  • Neuroscience (40889)
  • Paleontology (298)
  • Pathology (1226)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2126)
  • Physiology (3140)
  • Plant Biology (6838)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1270)
  • Synthetic Biology (1891)
  • Systems Biology (5296)
  • Zoology (1085)