Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Genetic load may increase or decrease with selfing depending upon the recombination environment

View ORCID ProfileShelley A Sianta, Stephan Peischl, David A Moeller, Yaniv Brandvain
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.20.445016
Shelley A Sianta
1University of Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shelley A Sianta
  • For correspondence: ssianta@umn.edu
Stephan Peischl
2University of Bern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A Moeller
1University of Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaniv Brandvain
3University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The ability of natural selection to remove deleterious mutations from a population is a function of the effective population size. Increases in selfing rate, and concomitant increases in population-level homozygosity, can increase or decrease the efficacy of selection, depending on the dominance and selection coefficients of the deleterious mutations. Most theory has focused on how (partial) selfing affects the efficacy of selection for mutations of a given dominance and fitness effect in isolation. It remains unclear how selfing affects the purging of deleterious mutations in a genome-wide context where mutations with different selection and dominance coefficients co-segregate. Here, we use computer simulations to investigate how mutation, selection and recombination interact with selfing rate to shape genome-wide patterns of genetic load. We recover various mechanisms previously described for how (partial) selfing affects the efficacy of selection against mutations of a given dominance class. However, we find that the interaction of purifying selection against mutations of different dominance classes changes with selfing rate. In particular, as outcrossing populations transition from purifying selection to pseudo-overdominance they experience a dramatic increase in the genetic load caused by additive, mildly deleterious mutations. We describe the threshold selfing rate that prevents pseudo-overdominance and decreases genetic load.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 18, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic load may increase or decrease with selfing depending upon the recombination environment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic load may increase or decrease with selfing depending upon the recombination environment
Shelley A Sianta, Stephan Peischl, David A Moeller, Yaniv Brandvain
bioRxiv 2021.05.20.445016; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.20.445016
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Genetic load may increase or decrease with selfing depending upon the recombination environment
Shelley A Sianta, Stephan Peischl, David A Moeller, Yaniv Brandvain
bioRxiv 2021.05.20.445016; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.20.445016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
  • Biochemistry (9095)
  • Bioengineering (6733)
  • Bioinformatics (23916)
  • Biophysics (12066)
  • Cancer Biology (9484)
  • Cell Biology (13720)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11644)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15459)
  • Genetics (10610)
  • Genomics (14281)
  • Immunology (9447)
  • Microbiology (22749)
  • Molecular Biology (9056)
  • Neuroscience (48811)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1478)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2558)
  • Physiology (3817)
  • Plant Biology (8299)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1466)
  • Synthetic Biology (2285)
  • Systems Biology (6163)
  • Zoology (1295)