Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

One shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task

View ORCID ProfileHenning Tiedemann, Yaniv Morgenstern, Filipp Schmidt, View ORCID ProfileRoland W Fleming
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446461
Henning Tiedemann
aDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Henning Tiedemann
  • For correspondence: Henning.Tiedemann@psychol.uni-giessen.de
Yaniv Morgenstern
aDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filipp Schmidt
aDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen
bCenter for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland W Fleming
aDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen
bCenter for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roland W Fleming
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Humans have the striking ability to learn and generalize new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. We suggest that when presented with a novel object, observers identify its significant features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants. To test this, we showed participants abstract 2D shapes (‘Exemplars’) and asked them to draw new objects (‘Variations’) belonging to the same class. We show that this procedure created genuine novel categories. In line with our hypothesis, particular features of each Exemplar were preserved in its Variations and there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive. Also, we show that strategies to create Variations were strongly driven by part structure: new objects typically modified individual parts (e.g., limbs) of the Exemplar, often preserving part order, sometimes altering it. Together, our findings suggest that sophisticated internal generative models are key to how humans analyze and generalize from single exemplars.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest

  • Data Sharing Policy: All stimuli and data will be made available on Zenodo upon acceptance002E

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 31, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
One shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
One shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
Henning Tiedemann, Yaniv Morgenstern, Filipp Schmidt, Roland W Fleming
bioRxiv 2021.05.31.446461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446461
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
One shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
Henning Tiedemann, Yaniv Morgenstern, Filipp Schmidt, Roland W Fleming
bioRxiv 2021.05.31.446461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446461

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4655)
  • Biochemistry (10307)
  • Bioengineering (7618)
  • Bioinformatics (26200)
  • Biophysics (13453)
  • Cancer Biology (10624)
  • Cell Biology (15348)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8453)
  • Ecology (12760)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16773)
  • Genetics (11361)
  • Genomics (15405)
  • Immunology (10554)
  • Microbiology (25060)
  • Molecular Biology (10162)
  • Neuroscience (54128)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1655)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2877)
  • Physiology (4314)
  • Plant Biology (9204)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1582)
  • Synthetic Biology (2543)
  • Systems Biology (6753)
  • Zoology (1453)