Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance

View ORCID ProfileE. Vergne, View ORCID ProfileE. Chevreau, E. Ravon, S. Gaillard, S. Pelletier, M. Bahut, L. Perchepied
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.446506
E. Vergne
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Vergne
  • For correspondence: Emilie.vergne@inrae.fr
E. Chevreau
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Chevreau
E. Ravon
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Gaillard
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Pelletier
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Bahut
2Univ Angers, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Perchepied
1Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Nonhost resistance is the outcome of most plant/pathogen interactions, but it has rarely been described in Rosaceous fruit species. Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) is a nonhost for Venturia pyrina, the scab species attacking European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Reciprocally, P. communis is a nonhost for Venturia inaequalis, the scab species attacking apple. The major objective of our study was to compare the scab nonhost resistance in apple and in European pear, at the phenotypic and transcriptomic levels.

Results Macro- and microscopic observations after reciprocal scab inoculations indicated that, after a similar germination step, nonhost apple/V. pyrina interaction remained nearly symptomless, whereas hypersensitive reactions were observed during nonhost pear/V. inaequalis interaction. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of apple and pear nonhost interactions with V. pyrina and V. inaequalis, respectively, revealed considerable differences. Very few differentially expressed genes were detected during apple/V. pyrina interaction, which is consistent with a symptomless type I nonhost resistance. On the contrary, numerous genes were differentially expressed during pear/V. inaequalis interaction, as expected in a type II nonhost resistance involving visible hypersensitive reaction. Pre-invasive defense, such as stomatal closure, was detected, as well as several post-invasive defense mechanisms (apoplastic reactive oxygen species accumulation, phytoalexin production and alterations of the epidermis composition). In addition, a comparative analysis between pear scab host and nonhost interactions indicated that, although specificities were observed, two major defense lines were shared in these resistances: cell wall and cuticle modifications and phenylpropanoid pathway induction.

Conclusion This first deciphering of the molecular mechanisms underlying a nonhost scab resistance in pear offers new possibilities for the genetic engineering of sustainable scab resistance in this species.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Improvement of the discussion and minor text revisions.

  • Abbreviations

    ABA
    abscisic acid
    CDPK
    calcium dependent protein kinase
    CRK
    cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase
    DEG
    differentially expressed gene
    DFR
    dihydroflavonol 4-reductase
    DGDG
    digalactosyldiacylglycerol
    ET
    ethylene
    ER
    endoplasmic reticulum
    ETI
    effector triggered immunity
    FAE
    fatty acid elongase
    GPAT
    glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase
    hpi
    hours post inoculation
    HR
    hypersensitive reaction
    JA
    jasmonic acid
    LCB
    long chain/sphingoid base component
    LCB-Ps
    long chain base phosphate component
    LOX
    lipoxygenase
    MAMP
    microbe-associated molecular pattern
    OPDA
    12-oxo-phytodienoic acid
    PCD
    programed cell death
    PTI
    pattern triggered immunity
    RBOH
    respiratory burst oxidase homolog
    ROS
    reactive oxygen species
    SA
    salicylic acid
    SAR
    systemic acquired resistance
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted May 06, 2022.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
    E. Vergne, E. Chevreau, E. Ravon, S. Gaillard, S. Pelletier, M. Bahut, L. Perchepied
    bioRxiv 2021.06.01.446506; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.446506
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
    E. Vergne, E. Chevreau, E. Ravon, S. Gaillard, S. Pelletier, M. Bahut, L. Perchepied
    bioRxiv 2021.06.01.446506; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.446506

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Genomics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3575)
    • Biochemistry (7520)
    • Bioengineering (5479)
    • Bioinformatics (20677)
    • Biophysics (10258)
    • Cancer Biology (7931)
    • Cell Biology (11583)
    • Clinical Trials (138)
    • Developmental Biology (6563)
    • Ecology (10136)
    • Epidemiology (2065)
    • Evolutionary Biology (13540)
    • Genetics (9498)
    • Genomics (12788)
    • Immunology (7872)
    • Microbiology (19451)
    • Molecular Biology (7614)
    • Neuroscience (41875)
    • Paleontology (306)
    • Pathology (1252)
    • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2179)
    • Physiology (3249)
    • Plant Biology (7007)
    • Scientific Communication and Education (1291)
    • Synthetic Biology (1942)
    • Systems Biology (5406)
    • Zoology (1107)