Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Analysis of scientific journalism in Nature reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage

View ORCID ProfileNatalie R. Davidson, View ORCID ProfileCasey S. Greene
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.21.449261
Natalie R. Davidson
1Center for Health AI, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalie R. Davidson
Casey S. Greene
1Center for Health AI, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Casey S. Greene
  • For correspondence: casey.s.greene@cuanschutz.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Scientific journalism is a critical way in which the public can remain informed and benefit from new scientific findings. Such journalism also shapes the public’s view of the current state of scientific findings and legitimizes experts. Those covering science can only cite and quote a limited number of sources. Sources may be identified by the journalist’s research or by recommendations by other scientists. In both cases, biases may influence who is identified and ultimately included as an expert. We analyzed 22,001 non-research articles published by Nature to quantify possible disparities. Our analysis considered three possible sources of disparity: gender, name origin, and country affiliation. To explore these sources of disparity, we extracted cited authors’ names and affiliations, as well as extracted names of quoted speakers. While citations and quotations within a piece do not reflect the entire information-gathering process, they can provide insight into the demographics of visible sources. We then used the extracted names to predict gender and name origin of the cited authors and speakers.

In order to appropriately quantify the level of difference, we must identify a suitable reference set for comparison. We chose first and last authors within primary research articles in Nature and a subset of Springer Nature articles in the same time period as our comparator. In our analysis, we found a skew towards male quotation in Nature journalism-related articles, but quotation is trending toward equal representation at a faster rate than first and last authorship in academic publishing. Interestingly, we found that the gender disparity in quotes was column-dependent, with the “Career Features” column reaching gender parity. Our name origin analysis found a significant over-representation of names with predicted Celtic/English origin and under-representation of names with a predicted East Asian origin. This finding was observed both in extracted quotes and journal citations, but dampened in citations. Finally, we performed an analysis to identify how countries vary in the way that they’re described in scientific journalism.

We focused on two groups of countries: countries that are often mentioned in articles, but do not often have affiliated authors cited, and countries that have affiliated authors that are often cited, but the country is not typically mentioned. We found that the articles in which the less cited countries occur tend to have more agricultural, extraction-related, and political terms, whereas articles including highly cited countries have broader scientific terms. This discrepancy indicates a possible lack of regional diversity in the reporting of scientific output.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵a Funded by The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF 4552)

  • nrosed, n_rose_d, cgreene, GreeneScientist

  • https://github.com/greenelab/nature_news_manuscript

  • https://github.com/greenelab/nature_news_disparities

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 22, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of scientific journalism in Nature reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Analysis of scientific journalism in Nature reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage
Natalie R. Davidson, Casey S. Greene
bioRxiv 2021.06.21.449261; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.21.449261
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Analysis of scientific journalism in Nature reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage
Natalie R. Davidson, Casey S. Greene
bioRxiv 2021.06.21.449261; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.21.449261

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4685)
  • Biochemistry (10362)
  • Bioengineering (7683)
  • Bioinformatics (26343)
  • Biophysics (13535)
  • Cancer Biology (10697)
  • Cell Biology (15446)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8501)
  • Ecology (12824)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16868)
  • Genetics (11402)
  • Genomics (15485)
  • Immunology (10623)
  • Microbiology (25226)
  • Molecular Biology (10225)
  • Neuroscience (54484)
  • Paleontology (402)
  • Pathology (1669)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2897)
  • Physiology (4345)
  • Plant Biology (9255)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1587)
  • Synthetic Biology (2558)
  • Systems Biology (6781)
  • Zoology (1467)