Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Comparison of Transformations for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data

View ORCID ProfileConstantin Ahlmann-Eltze, View ORCID ProfileWolfgang Huber
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.449781
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze
⋆Genome Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany
†Collaboration for joint PhD degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze
  • For correspondence: constantin.ahlmann@embl.de
Wolfgang Huber
⋆Genome Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wolfgang Huber
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The count table, a numeric matrix of genes × cells, is the basic input data structure in the analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data. A common preprocessing step is to adjust the counts for variable sampling efficiency and to transform them so that the variance is similar across the dynamic range. These steps are intended to make subsequent application of generic statistical methods more palatable. Here, we describe four transformation approaches based on the delta method, model residuals, inferred latent expression state, and factor analysis. We compare their strengths and weaknesses and find that the latter three have appealing theoretical properties. However, in benchmarks using simulated and real-world data, it turns out that a rather simple approach, namely, the logarithm with a pseudo-count followed by principal component analysis, performs as well or better than the more sophisticated alternatives.

Software The R package transformGamPoi implementing the delta method- and residuals-based variance-stabilizing transformations is available via Bioconductor. We provide an interactive website to explore the benchmark results at shiny-portal.embl.de/shinyapps/app/08_single-cell_transformation_benchmark.

Contact constantin.ahlmann{at}embl.de

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • * We included two negative controls in the benchmark to demonstrate that the transformations perform better than applying no transformation or just scaling by the size factor * We provided more details in the Methods section * We included two new Supplementary Figures (S9, S10) that show the results of the reliable nearest neighbor benchmark for a reduced set of transformations

  • https://github.com/const-ae/transformGamPoi

  • https://github.com/const-ae/transformGamPoi-Paper

  • https://shiny-portal.embl.de/shinyapps/app/08_single-cell_transformation_benchmark

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 12, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Transformations for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Transformations for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze, Wolfgang Huber
bioRxiv 2021.06.24.449781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.449781
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of Transformations for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze, Wolfgang Huber
bioRxiv 2021.06.24.449781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.24.449781

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4109)
  • Biochemistry (8813)
  • Bioengineering (6517)
  • Bioinformatics (23456)
  • Biophysics (11788)
  • Cancer Biology (9205)
  • Cell Biology (13318)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7433)
  • Ecology (11407)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15145)
  • Genetics (10433)
  • Genomics (14041)
  • Immunology (9169)
  • Microbiology (22152)
  • Molecular Biology (8808)
  • Neuroscience (47558)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1428)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2491)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8079)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6037)
  • Zoology (1252)