Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Where there’s smoke, there’s fuel: dynamic vegetation data improve predictions of wildfire hazard in the Great Basin

View ORCID ProfileJoseph T. Smith, Brady W. Allred, Chad S. Boyd, Kirk W. Davies, Matthew O. Jones, Andrew R. Kleinhesselink, Jeremy D. Maestas, David E. Naugle
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.25.449963
Joseph T. Smith
aNumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph T. Smith
  • For correspondence: joe.smith@umontana.edu
Brady W. Allred
aNumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
bW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chad S. Boyd
cUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR, 97720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirk W. Davies
cUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR, 97720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew O. Jones
aNumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew R. Kleinhesselink
aNumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy D. Maestas
dUS Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Portland, OR, 97232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Naugle
bW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Wildfires are a growing management concern in western US rangelands, where invasive annual grasses have altered fire regimes and contributed to an increased incidence of catastrophic large wildfires. Fire activity in arid, non-forested ecosystems is thought to be largely controlled by interannual variation in fuel amount, which in turn is controlled by antecedent weather. Thus, long-range forecasting of fire activity in rangelands should be feasible given annual estimates of fuel quantity. Using a 32 yr time series of spatial data, we employed machine learning algorithms to predict the relative probability of large (>405 ha) wildfire in the Great Basin based on fine-scale annual and 16-day estimates of cover and production of vegetation functional groups, weather, and multitemporal scale drought indices. We evaluated the predictive utility of these models with a leave-one-year-out cross-validation, building spatial hindcasts of fire probability for each year that we compared against actual footprints of large wildfires. Herbaceous aboveground biomass production, bare ground cover, and long-term drought indices were the most important predictors of burning. Across 32 fire seasons, 88% of the area burned in large wildfires coincided with the upper 3 deciles of predicted fire probabilities. At the scale of the Great Basin, several metrics of fire activity were moderately to strongly correlated with average fire probability, including total area burned in large wildfires, number of large wildfires, and maximum fire size. Our findings show that recent years of exceptional fire activity in the Great Basin were predictable based on antecedent weather-driven growth of fine fuels and reveal a significant increasing trend in fire probability over the last three decades driven by widespread changes in fine fuel characteristics.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Methods clarified; added earlier forecast dates; model performance compared to existing burn probability model; added conditional variable importances.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 18, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Where there’s smoke, there’s fuel: dynamic vegetation data improve predictions of wildfire hazard in the Great Basin
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Where there’s smoke, there’s fuel: dynamic vegetation data improve predictions of wildfire hazard in the Great Basin
Joseph T. Smith, Brady W. Allred, Chad S. Boyd, Kirk W. Davies, Matthew O. Jones, Andrew R. Kleinhesselink, Jeremy D. Maestas, David E. Naugle
bioRxiv 2021.06.25.449963; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.25.449963
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Where there’s smoke, there’s fuel: dynamic vegetation data improve predictions of wildfire hazard in the Great Basin
Joseph T. Smith, Brady W. Allred, Chad S. Boyd, Kirk W. Davies, Matthew O. Jones, Andrew R. Kleinhesselink, Jeremy D. Maestas, David E. Naugle
bioRxiv 2021.06.25.449963; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.25.449963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3573)
  • Biochemistry (7517)
  • Bioengineering (5478)
  • Bioinformatics (20671)
  • Biophysics (10254)
  • Cancer Biology (7927)
  • Cell Biology (11566)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6563)
  • Ecology (10130)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13532)
  • Genetics (9496)
  • Genomics (12788)
  • Immunology (7869)
  • Microbiology (19443)
  • Molecular Biology (7611)
  • Neuroscience (41862)
  • Paleontology (306)
  • Pathology (1252)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2179)
  • Physiology (3249)
  • Plant Biology (7002)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1291)
  • Synthetic Biology (1941)
  • Systems Biology (5405)
  • Zoology (1107)