Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Mistreating birth-death models as priors in phylogenetic analysis compromises our ability to compare models

Michael R. May, Carl J. Rothfels
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452074
Michael R. May
1University Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Californias, Berkeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mrmay@berkeley.edu
Carl J. Rothfels
1University Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Californias, Berkeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading
  • supplemental material[supplements/452074_file02.pdf]
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 12, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mistreating birth-death models as priors in phylogenetic analysis compromises our ability to compare models
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mistreating birth-death models as priors in phylogenetic analysis compromises our ability to compare models
Michael R. May, Carl J. Rothfels
bioRxiv 2021.07.12.452074; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452074
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mistreating birth-death models as priors in phylogenetic analysis compromises our ability to compare models
Michael R. May, Carl J. Rothfels
bioRxiv 2021.07.12.452074; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452074

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3689)
  • Biochemistry (7797)
  • Bioengineering (5676)
  • Bioinformatics (21287)
  • Biophysics (10578)
  • Cancer Biology (8174)
  • Cell Biology (11945)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6763)
  • Ecology (10401)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13867)
  • Genetics (9708)
  • Genomics (13073)
  • Immunology (8146)
  • Microbiology (20014)
  • Molecular Biology (7853)
  • Neuroscience (43058)
  • Paleontology (319)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2258)
  • Physiology (3352)
  • Plant Biology (7232)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1312)
  • Synthetic Biology (2006)
  • Systems Biology (5538)
  • Zoology (1128)