Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in Ophthalmotilapia

View ORCID ProfileMaarten Van Steenberge, Noémie Jublier, Loïc Kéver, View ORCID ProfileSophie Gresham, View ORCID ProfileSofie Derycke, View ORCID ProfileJos Snoeks, View ORCID ProfileEric Parmentier, Pascal Poncin, View ORCID ProfileErik Verheyen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.07.455508
Maarten Van Steenberge
1Operational Directorate Taxonomy and phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
2Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maarten Van Steenberge
  • For correspondence: mvansteenberge@naturalsciences.be
Noémie Jublier
3Laboratory of Functional and Evolutionary Biology, FOCUS, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium
4Laboratory of Fish and Amphibian Ethology, Behavioural Biology Unit, FOCUS, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loïc Kéver
3Laboratory of Functional and Evolutionary Biology, FOCUS, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie Gresham
1Operational Directorate Taxonomy and phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
5Department Biology, Evolutionary Ecology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sophie Gresham
Sofie Derycke
1Operational Directorate Taxonomy and phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
6Flanders research institute for agriculture, fisheries and food, Animal Sciences Unit – Aquatic Environment and Quality, Ankerstraat 1, 8400 Oostende, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sofie Derycke
Jos Snoeks
2Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
7Section Vertebrates, Ichthyology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, 3080 Tervuren, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jos Snoeks
Eric Parmentier
3Laboratory of Functional and Evolutionary Biology, FOCUS, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric Parmentier
Pascal Poncin
4Laboratory of Fish and Amphibian Ethology, Behavioural Biology Unit, FOCUS, Liège University, 4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Verheyen
1Operational Directorate Taxonomy and phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
5Department Biology, Evolutionary Ecology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik Verheyen
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cichlid radiations often harbour closely related species with overlapping niches and distribution ranges. Such species sometimes hybridize in nature, which raises the question how can they coexist. This also holds for the Tanganyika mouthbrooders Ophthalmotilapia ventralis and O. nasuta. Earlier studies found indications of asymmetrical hybridisation with females of O. ventralis accepting males of O. nasuta, but not the other way around. We hypothesised that this was due to differences in the capacity for species recognition. Given the higher propensity of O. ventralis females towards hybridization, we expect a reduced ability for species recognition in O. ventralis females, compared to O. nasuta females. We staged two experiments, one focusing on 22 female O. nasuta and one on 21 female O. ventralis. These fish were placed in one half of a tank and briefly exposed to a conspecific or a heterospecific male, a conspecific female, or nothing (control). Female response was evaluated by scoring six tracking parameters and by noting the occurrence of ten discrete behaviours before and during the first encounter. Females always responded to the presence of another fish by approaching it. Remarkably, for both O. nasuta and O. ventralis, we did not find a different response between encounters with conspecific males and females. However, in agreement with our hypothesis, O. nasuta females behaved differently towards conspecific or heterospecific males, whereas O. ventralis females did not. When presented with a heterospecific male, O. nasuta females performed a lower number of ‘ram’ behaviours. Additionally, they never displayed the ‘flee’ behaviour, a component of the species’ mating repertoire that was seen in all but one of the presentations with a conspecific male. Our findings show that differences in species recognition at first encounter predict to a large degree the outcome of the mating process, even in the absence of mating behaviour.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 08, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in Ophthalmotilapia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in Ophthalmotilapia
Maarten Van Steenberge, Noémie Jublier, Loïc Kéver, Sophie Gresham, Sofie Derycke, Jos Snoeks, Eric Parmentier, Pascal Poncin, Erik Verheyen
bioRxiv 2021.08.07.455508; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.07.455508
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in Ophthalmotilapia
Maarten Van Steenberge, Noémie Jublier, Loïc Kéver, Sophie Gresham, Sofie Derycke, Jos Snoeks, Eric Parmentier, Pascal Poncin, Erik Verheyen
bioRxiv 2021.08.07.455508; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.07.455508

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3514)
  • Biochemistry (7371)
  • Bioengineering (5347)
  • Bioinformatics (20328)
  • Biophysics (10048)
  • Cancer Biology (7781)
  • Cell Biology (11353)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6454)
  • Ecology (9984)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13359)
  • Genetics (9375)
  • Genomics (12614)
  • Immunology (7729)
  • Microbiology (19118)
  • Molecular Biology (7477)
  • Neuroscience (41163)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1235)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2142)
  • Physiology (3182)
  • Plant Biology (6882)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1276)
  • Synthetic Biology (1900)
  • Systems Biology (5328)
  • Zoology (1091)