Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Next generation restoration metrics: Using soil eDNA bacterial community data to measure trajectories towards rehabilitation targets

View ORCID ProfileCraig Liddicoat, Siegfried L. Krauss, Andrew Bissett, Ryan J. Borrett, Luisa C. Ducki, Shawn D. Peddle, Paul Bullock, Mark P. Dobrowolski, Andrew Grigg, Mark Tibbett, Martin F. Breed
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.12.456018
Craig Liddicoat
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
2School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Craig Liddicoat
  • For correspondence: craig.liddicoat@flinders.edu.au
Siegfried L. Krauss
3Kings Park Science, Western Australia Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, Perth, Australia
4School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Bissett
5CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan J. Borrett
6College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luisa C. Ducki
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
6College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shawn D. Peddle
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Bullock
7South32 Worsley Alumina, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark P. Dobrowolski
4School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
8Iluka Resources Limited, Perth, Australia
9Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Grigg
10Alcoa of Australia Limited, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Tibbett
4School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
11Department of Sustainable Land Management & Soil Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin F. Breed
1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In post-mining rehabilitation, successful mine closure planning requires specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART) completion criteria, such as returning ecological communities to match a target level of similarity to reference sites. Soil microbiota are fundamentally linked to the restoration of degraded ecosystems, helping to underpin ecological functions and plant communities. High-throughput sequencing of soil eDNA to characterise these communities offers promise to help monitor and predict ecological progress towards reference states. Here we demonstrate a novel methodology for monitoring and evaluating ecological restoration using three long-term (> 25 year) case study post-mining rehabilitation soil eDNA-based bacterial community datasets. Specifically, we developed rehabilitation trajectory assessments based on similarity to reference data from restoration chronosequence datasets. Recognising that many alternative options for microbiota data processing have potential to influence these assessments, we comprehensively examined the influence of standard versus compositional data analyses, different ecological distance measures, sequence grouping approaches, eliminating rare taxa, and the potential for excessive spatial autocorrelation to impact on results. Our approach reduces the complexity of information that often overwhelms ecologically-relevant patterns in microbiota studies, and enables prediction of recovery time, with explicit inclusion of uncertainty in assessments. We offer a step change in the development of quantitative microbiota-based SMART metrics for measuring rehabilitation success. Our approach may also have wider applications where restorative processes facilitate the shift of microbiota towards reference states.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • This revision includes compositional analyses and automated logarithmic modelling of recovery trajectories that accounts for biological inertia in direct return post-mining rehabilitation soils.

  • https://data.bioplatforms.com/organization/about/australian-microbiome

  • https://github.com/liddic/resto_traj

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 05, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Next generation restoration metrics: Using soil eDNA bacterial community data to measure trajectories towards rehabilitation targets
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Next generation restoration metrics: Using soil eDNA bacterial community data to measure trajectories towards rehabilitation targets
Craig Liddicoat, Siegfried L. Krauss, Andrew Bissett, Ryan J. Borrett, Luisa C. Ducki, Shawn D. Peddle, Paul Bullock, Mark P. Dobrowolski, Andrew Grigg, Mark Tibbett, Martin F. Breed
bioRxiv 2021.08.12.456018; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.12.456018
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Next generation restoration metrics: Using soil eDNA bacterial community data to measure trajectories towards rehabilitation targets
Craig Liddicoat, Siegfried L. Krauss, Andrew Bissett, Ryan J. Borrett, Luisa C. Ducki, Shawn D. Peddle, Paul Bullock, Mark P. Dobrowolski, Andrew Grigg, Mark Tibbett, Martin F. Breed
bioRxiv 2021.08.12.456018; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.12.456018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3701)
  • Biochemistry (7820)
  • Bioengineering (5695)
  • Bioinformatics (21343)
  • Biophysics (10603)
  • Cancer Biology (8206)
  • Cell Biology (11974)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6786)
  • Ecology (10425)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13908)
  • Genetics (9731)
  • Genomics (13109)
  • Immunology (8171)
  • Microbiology (20064)
  • Molecular Biology (7875)
  • Neuroscience (43171)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1282)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2267)
  • Physiology (3363)
  • Plant Biology (7254)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1316)
  • Synthetic Biology (2012)
  • Systems Biology (5550)
  • Zoology (1133)