Article Information
History
- February 23, 2022.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (August 13, 2021 - 13:10).
- Version 2 (December 28, 2021 - 06:51).
- You are currently viewing Version 3 of this article (February 23, 2022 - 23:42).
- View Version 4, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- 1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
- 2Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
- ↵*Correspondence to: Olivia Kim, oakim{at}princeton.edu, kim.olivia.a{at}gmail.com
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization, OK, AF, & SM; Methodology, OK, AF, & SM; Software, AF & OK; Validation, OK & AF; Formal Analysis, OK & AF; Investigation, OK & AF; Resources, OK & SM; Data Curation, OK & AF; Supervision, SM; Project Administration, SM; Funding Acquisition, OK & SM; Writing – original draft, OK; Writing – review & editing, OK, AF, & SM
Posted February 23, 2022.
Movement planning and feedback are sufficient for sensory prediction error computation and motor adaptation
