Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Preservation of eye movements in Parkinson’s disease is stimulus and task specific

View ORCID ProfileJolande Fooken, Pooja Patel, Christina B. Jones, Martin J. McKeown, Miriam Spering
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.17.456700
Jolande Fooken
1Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
2Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jolande Fooken
  • For correspondence: jolande.fooken@queensu.ca
Pooja Patel
2Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina B. Jones
5Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin J. McKeown
3Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
4Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
5Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam Spering
2Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
3Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
4Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
6Institute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that includes motor impairments such as tremor, bradykinesia, and postural instability. Although eye movement deficits are commonly found in saccade and pursuit tasks, preservation of oculomotor function has also been reported. Here we investigate specific task and stimulus conditions under which oculomotor function in PD is preserved. Sixteen PD patients and eighteen healthy, age-matched controls completed a battery of movement tasks that included stationary or moving targets eliciting reactive or deliberate eye movements: pro-saccades, anti-saccades, visually-guided pursuit, and rapid go/no-go manual interception. Compared to controls, patients demonstrated systematic impairments in tasks with stationary targets: pro-saccades were hypometric and anti-saccades were incorrectly initiated toward the cued target in about 35% of trials compared to 14% errors in controls. In patients, task errors were linked to short latency saccades, indicating abnormalities in inhibitory control. However, patients’ eye movements in response to dynamic targets were relatively preserved. PD patients were able to track and predict a disappearing moving target and make quick go/no-go decisions as accurately as controls. Patients’ interceptive hand movements were slower on average but initiated earlier, indicating adaptive processes to compensate for motor slowing. We conclude that PD patients demonstrate stimulus- and task-dependency of oculomotor impairments and propose that preservation of eye and hand movement function in PD is linked to a separate functional pathway through the SC-brainstem loop that bypasses the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Significance Statement Eye movements are a promising clinical tool to aid in the diagnosis of movement disorders and to monitor disease progression. Although Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients show some oculomotor abnormalities, it is not clear whether previously-described eye movement impairments are task specific. We assessed eye movements in PD under different visual (stationary vs. moving targets) and movement (reactive vs. deliberate) conditions. We demonstrate that PD patients are able to accurately track moving objects but make inaccurate eye movements towards stationary targets. The preservation of eye movements towards dynamic stimuli might enable patients to accurately act upon the predicted motion path of the moving target. These results can inform the development of tools for the rehabilitation or maintenance of functional performance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 18, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preservation of eye movements in Parkinson’s disease is stimulus and task specific
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Preservation of eye movements in Parkinson’s disease is stimulus and task specific
Jolande Fooken, Pooja Patel, Christina B. Jones, Martin J. McKeown, Miriam Spering
bioRxiv 2021.08.17.456700; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.17.456700
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Preservation of eye movements in Parkinson’s disease is stimulus and task specific
Jolande Fooken, Pooja Patel, Christina B. Jones, Martin J. McKeown, Miriam Spering
bioRxiv 2021.08.17.456700; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.17.456700

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4688)
  • Biochemistry (10380)
  • Bioengineering (7695)
  • Bioinformatics (26373)
  • Biophysics (13551)
  • Cancer Biology (10729)
  • Cell Biology (15464)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8509)
  • Ecology (12844)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16887)
  • Genetics (11416)
  • Genomics (15493)
  • Immunology (10638)
  • Microbiology (25257)
  • Molecular Biology (10241)
  • Neuroscience (54597)
  • Paleontology (402)
  • Pathology (1671)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2899)
  • Physiology (4355)
  • Plant Biology (9263)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1588)
  • Synthetic Biology (2561)
  • Systems Biology (6789)
  • Zoology (1472)