Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments

View ORCID ProfileRyan J. Murphy, View ORCID ProfileAlexander P. Browning, Gency Gunasingh, View ORCID ProfileNikolas K. Haass, View ORCID ProfileMatthew J. Simpson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.18.456910
Ryan J. Murphy
1Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan J. Murphy
Alexander P. Browning
1Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander P. Browning
Gency Gunasingh
2The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolas K. Haass
2The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nikolas K. Haass
Matthew J. Simpson
1Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew J. Simpson
  • For correspondence: matthew.simpson@qut.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imaging, we measure necrotic and proliferation-inhibited regions in over 1000 4D tumour spheroids (3D space plus cell cycle status). By intentionally varying the initial spheroid size and temporal sampling frequencies across multiple cell lines, we collect an abundance of measurements of internal spheroid structure. These data are difficult to compare and interpret. However, using an objective mathematical modelling framework and statistical identifiability analysis we quantitatively compare experimental designs and identify design choices that produce reliable biological insight. Measurements of internal spheroid structure provide the most insight, whereas varying initial spheroid size and temporal measurement frequency is less important. Our general framework applies to spheroids grown in different conditions and with different cell types.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Supplementary material updated, added link to code and data on GitHub.

  • https://github.com/ryanmurphy42/4DSpheroids_Murphy2021

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 26, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
Ryan J. Murphy, Alexander P. Browning, Gency Gunasingh, Nikolas K. Haass, Matthew J. Simpson
bioRxiv 2021.08.18.456910; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.18.456910
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
Ryan J. Murphy, Alexander P. Browning, Gency Gunasingh, Nikolas K. Haass, Matthew J. Simpson
bioRxiv 2021.08.18.456910; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.18.456910

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biophysics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4855)
  • Biochemistry (10796)
  • Bioengineering (8045)
  • Bioinformatics (27310)
  • Biophysics (13987)
  • Cancer Biology (11127)
  • Cell Biology (16061)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8788)
  • Ecology (13293)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (17364)
  • Genetics (11689)
  • Genomics (15924)
  • Immunology (11034)
  • Microbiology (26091)
  • Molecular Biology (10650)
  • Neuroscience (56565)
  • Paleontology (418)
  • Pathology (1732)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3005)
  • Physiology (4547)
  • Plant Biology (9630)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1615)
  • Synthetic Biology (2689)
  • Systems Biology (6978)
  • Zoology (1510)