Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies

View ORCID ProfileSimon Wakeling, View ORCID ProfileDanny Kingsley, View ORCID ProfileHamid Jamali, View ORCID ProfileMary Anne Kennan, View ORCID ProfileMaryam Sarrafzadeh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.20.457045
Simon Wakeling
1Charles Sturt University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon Wakeling
  • For correspondence: swakeling@csu.edu.au
Danny Kingsley
2Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, ANU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Danny Kingsley
Hamid Jamali
1Charles Sturt University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hamid Jamali
Mary Anne Kennan
1Charles Sturt University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary Anne Kennan
Maryam Sarrafzadeh
3University of Tehran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maryam Sarrafzadeh
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent research demonstrates that Australia lags in providing open access to research outputs. In Australia, while the two major research funding bodies require open access of outputs from projects they fund, these bodies only fund a small proportion of research conducted. The major source of research and experimental development funding in Australian higher education is general university, or institutional, funding, and such funds are not subject to national funder open access policies. Thus, institutional policies and other institutional supports for open access are important in understanding Australia’s OA position. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to understand the characteristics of Australian institutional open access policies and to explore the extent they represent a coherent and unified approach to delivering and promoting open access in Australia. Open access policies were located using a systematic web search approach and then their contents were analysed. Only half of Australian universities were found to have an open access policy. There was a wide variation in language used, expressed intent of the policy and expectations of researchers. Few policies mention monitoring or compliance and only three mention consequences for non-compliance. While it is understandable that institutions develop their own policies, when language is used which does not reflect national and international understandings, when requirements are not clear and with consequences, policies are unlikely to contribute to understanding of open access, to uptake of the policy, or to ease of transferring understanding and practices between institutions. A more unified approach to open access is recommended.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Hamid Jamali – Charles Sturt University

  • https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15595572.v1

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies
Simon Wakeling, Danny Kingsley, Hamid Jamali, Mary Anne Kennan, Maryam Sarrafzadeh
bioRxiv 2021.08.20.457045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.20.457045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies
Simon Wakeling, Danny Kingsley, Hamid Jamali, Mary Anne Kennan, Maryam Sarrafzadeh
bioRxiv 2021.08.20.457045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.20.457045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4107)
  • Biochemistry (8811)
  • Bioengineering (6513)
  • Bioinformatics (23452)
  • Biophysics (11786)
  • Cancer Biology (9202)
  • Cell Biology (13316)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7431)
  • Ecology (11406)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15144)
  • Genetics (10433)
  • Genomics (14037)
  • Immunology (9168)
  • Microbiology (22150)
  • Molecular Biology (8806)
  • Neuroscience (47554)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2490)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8078)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)