Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A case for glycerol as an acceptable additive for single particle cryoEM samples

View ORCID ProfileBenjamin Basanta, View ORCID ProfileMarscha M. Hirschi, View ORCID ProfileDanielle A. Grotjahn, View ORCID ProfileGabriel C. Lander
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.10.459874
Benjamin Basanta
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benjamin Basanta
Marscha M. Hirschi
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marscha M. Hirschi
Danielle A. Grotjahn
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Danielle A. Grotjahn
Gabriel C. Lander
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriel C. Lander
  • For correspondence: glander@scripps.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Buffer composition and sample preparation guidelines for cryo-electron microscopy are geared toward maximizing imaging contrast and reducing electron beam-induced motion. These pursuits often involve the minimization or complete removal of additives that are commonly used to facilitate proper protein folding and minimize aggregation. Among these admonished additives is glycerol, a widely used osmolyte that aids protein stability. In this work, we show that inclusion of glycerol does not preclude high-resolution structure determination by cryoEM, as demonstrated by a ∼2.3 Å reconstruction of mouse apoferritin (∼500 kDa) and a ∼3.3 Å reconstruction of rabbit muscle aldolase (∼160 kDa) in presence of 20% v/v glycerol. While we found that generating thin ice that is amenable for high-resolution imaging requires long blot times, the addition of glycerol did not result in increased beam-induced motion nor an inability to pick particles. Overall, our findings indicate glycerol should not be discounted as a cryoEM sample buffer additive, particularly for large, fragile complexes that are prone to disassembly or aggregation upon its removal.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 11, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A case for glycerol as an acceptable additive for single particle cryoEM samples
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A case for glycerol as an acceptable additive for single particle cryoEM samples
Benjamin Basanta, Marscha M. Hirschi, Danielle A. Grotjahn, Gabriel C. Lander
bioRxiv 2021.09.10.459874; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.10.459874
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A case for glycerol as an acceptable additive for single particle cryoEM samples
Benjamin Basanta, Marscha M. Hirschi, Danielle A. Grotjahn, Gabriel C. Lander
bioRxiv 2021.09.10.459874; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.10.459874

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biophysics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3686)
  • Biochemistry (7773)
  • Bioengineering (5668)
  • Bioinformatics (21244)
  • Biophysics (10563)
  • Cancer Biology (8160)
  • Cell Biology (11909)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6737)
  • Ecology (10388)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13842)
  • Genetics (9694)
  • Genomics (13056)
  • Immunology (8123)
  • Microbiology (19955)
  • Molecular Biology (7831)
  • Neuroscience (42970)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1276)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2256)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7208)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1309)
  • Synthetic Biology (1999)
  • Systems Biology (5528)
  • Zoology (1126)