Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Responses to Temperatures of Different Drosophila Species

Ainul Huda, Thomas J. Vaden, Alisa A. Omelchenko, Allison N. Castaneda, View ORCID ProfileLina Ni
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.01.462748
Ainul Huda
1School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Vaden
1School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alisa A. Omelchenko
1School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison N. Castaneda
1School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lina Ni
1School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lina Ni
  • For correspondence: linani@vt.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Temperature is a critical environmental variable that affects the distribution, survival, and reproduction of most animals. Although temperature receptors have been identified in different animals, how these receptors respond to temperatures is largely unknown. Here we use modified single-fly thermotactic assays to analyze movements and temperature preferences of nine Drosophila species. The ability/inclination to move varies among these species and at different temperatures. Importantly, different species prefer various ranges of temperatures. While wild-type D. melanogaster flies avoid the warm temperature in the warm avoidance assay and the cool temperature in the cool avoidance assay, D. bipectinata and D. yakuba avoid neither warm nor cool temperatures and D. biarmipes and D. mojavensis do not avoid the warm temperature in the warm avoidance assay. These results demonstrate that Drosophila species have different mobilities and temperature preferences, thereby benefiting the research on molecular mechanisms of temperature responsiveness.

Summary statement The ability to move and the preference for temperatures vary among fly species when flies are exposed to steep temperature gradients.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 02, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Responses to Temperatures of Different Drosophila Species
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Responses to Temperatures of Different Drosophila Species
Ainul Huda, Thomas J. Vaden, Alisa A. Omelchenko, Allison N. Castaneda, Lina Ni
bioRxiv 2021.10.01.462748; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.01.462748
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Responses to Temperatures of Different Drosophila Species
Ainul Huda, Thomas J. Vaden, Alisa A. Omelchenko, Allison N. Castaneda, Lina Ni
bioRxiv 2021.10.01.462748; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.01.462748

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4121)
  • Biochemistry (8830)
  • Bioengineering (6535)
  • Bioinformatics (23492)
  • Biophysics (11814)
  • Cancer Biology (9233)
  • Cell Biology (13350)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7452)
  • Ecology (11429)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15179)
  • Genetics (10456)
  • Genomics (14057)
  • Immunology (9192)
  • Microbiology (22219)
  • Molecular Biology (8831)
  • Neuroscience (47665)
  • Paleontology (352)
  • Pathology (1432)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2493)
  • Physiology (3741)
  • Plant Biology (8097)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1438)
  • Synthetic Biology (2225)
  • Systems Biology (6046)
  • Zoology (1258)