Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Archerfish number discrimination

View ORCID ProfileDavide Potrich, View ORCID ProfileMirko Zanon, View ORCID ProfileGiorgio Vallortigara
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463045
Davide Potrich
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Davide Potrich
  • For correspondence: davide.potrich@unitn.it giorgio.vallortigara@unitn.it
Mirko Zanon
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mirko Zanon
Giorgio Vallortigara
1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Giorgio Vallortigara
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Debates have arisen as to whether non-human animals actually can learn astract non-symbolic numerousness or whether they always rely on some continuous physical aspect of the stimuli covarying with number. Here we investigated archerfish (Toxotes jaculatrix) non-symbolic numerical discrimination with accurate control for co-varying continuous physical stimulus attributes. Archerfish were trained to select one of two groups of black dots (Exp. 1: 3 vs. 6 elements; Exp. 2: 2 vs. 3 elements); these were controlled for several combinations of physical variables (elements’ size, overall area, overall perimeter, density and sparsity), ensuring that only numerical information was available. Generalization tests with novel numerical comparisons (2 vs. 3, 5 vs. 8 and 6 vs. 9 in Exp. 1; 3 vs. 4, 3 vs. 6 in Exp. 2) revealed choice for the largest or smallest numerical group according to the relative number that was rewarded at training. None of the continuous physical variables, including spatial frequency, were affecting archerfish performance. Results provide evidence of the spontaneous use of abstract relative numerical information in archerfish for both small and large numbers.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 05, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Archerfish number discrimination
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Archerfish number discrimination
Davide Potrich, Mirko Zanon, Giorgio Vallortigara
bioRxiv 2021.10.04.463045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Archerfish number discrimination
Davide Potrich, Mirko Zanon, Giorgio Vallortigara
bioRxiv 2021.10.04.463045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4087)
  • Biochemistry (8766)
  • Bioengineering (6480)
  • Bioinformatics (23346)
  • Biophysics (11751)
  • Cancer Biology (9150)
  • Cell Biology (13255)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7417)
  • Ecology (11370)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15088)
  • Genetics (10402)
  • Genomics (14012)
  • Immunology (9122)
  • Microbiology (22050)
  • Molecular Biology (8780)
  • Neuroscience (47376)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8050)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2209)
  • Systems Biology (6016)
  • Zoology (1250)