Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations—A Multi-Scale Modeling Study

View ORCID ProfileHyeyeon Chung, View ORCID ProfileCheolki Im, Hyeon Seo, View ORCID ProfileSung Chan Jun
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.06.463305
Hyeyeon Chung
1School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hyeyeon Chung
Cheolki Im
1School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cheolki Im
Hyeon Seo
2Medical Device Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sung Chan Jun
1School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sung Chan Jun
  • For correspondence: scjun@gist.ac.kr
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Transcranial electrode stimulation (tES), one of the techniques used to apply non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), modulates cortical activities by delivering weak electric currents through scalp-attached electrodes. This emerging technique has gained increasing attention recently; however, the results of tES vary greatly depending upon subjects and the stimulation paradigm, and its cellular mechanism remains uncertain. In particular, there is a controversy over the factors that determine the cortical response to tES. Some studies have reported that the electric field’s (EF) orientation is the determining factor, while others have demonstrated that the EF magnitude itself is the crucial factor. In this work, we conducted an in-depth investigation of cortical activity in two types of electrode montages used widely—the conventional (C)-tES and high-definition (HD)-tES—as well as two stimulation waveforms—direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC). To do so, we constructed a multi-scale model by coupling an anatomically realistic human head model and morphologically realistic multi-compartmental models of three types of cortical neurons (layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron, layer 4 basket cell, layer 5 pyramidal neuron). Then, we quantified the neuronal response to the C-/HD-tDCS/tACS and explored the relation between the electric field (EF) and the radial field’s (RF: radial component of EF) magnitude and the cortical neurons’ threshold. The EF tES induced depended upon the electrode montage, and the neuronal responses were correlated with the EF rather than the RF’s magnitude. The electrode montages and stimulation waveforms caused a small difference in threshold, but the higher correlation between the EF’s magnitude and the threshold was consistent. Further, we observed that the neurons’ morphological features affected the degree of the correlation highly. Thus, the EF magnitude was a key factor in the responses of neurons with arborized axons. Our results demonstrate that the crucial factor in neuronal excitability depends upon the neuron models’ morphological and biophysical properties. Hence, to predict the cellular targets of NIBS precisely, it is necessary to adopt more advanced neuron models that mimic realistic morphological and biophysical features of actual human cells.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 07, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations—A Multi-Scale Modeling Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations—A Multi-Scale Modeling Study
Hyeyeon Chung, Cheolki Im, Hyeon Seo, Sung Chan Jun
bioRxiv 2021.10.06.463305; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.06.463305
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations—A Multi-Scale Modeling Study
Hyeyeon Chung, Cheolki Im, Hyeon Seo, Sung Chan Jun
bioRxiv 2021.10.06.463305; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.06.463305

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
  • Biochemistry (9096)
  • Bioengineering (6741)
  • Bioinformatics (23922)
  • Biophysics (12069)
  • Cancer Biology (9484)
  • Cell Biology (13722)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11646)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15467)
  • Genetics (10611)
  • Genomics (14285)
  • Immunology (9451)
  • Microbiology (22756)
  • Molecular Biology (9057)
  • Neuroscience (48816)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1478)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2559)
  • Physiology (3819)
  • Plant Biology (8307)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2285)
  • Systems Biology (6164)
  • Zoology (1296)