Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Evolution of diapause in the African turquoise killifish by remodeling ancient gene regulatory landscape

View ORCID ProfileParam Priya Singh, G. Adam Reeves, View ORCID ProfileKévin Contrepois, Mathew Ellenberger, Chi-Kuo Hu, Michael P. Snyder, Anne Brunet
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.25.465616
Param Priya Singh
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Param Priya Singh
G. Adam Reeves
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kévin Contrepois
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
2Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kévin Contrepois
Mathew Ellenberger
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi-Kuo Hu
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael P. Snyder
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
2Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
3Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Brunet
1Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
4Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: abrunet1@stanford.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Suspended animation states such as hibernation or diapause allow organisms to survive extreme environments. But the mechanisms underlying the evolution of these extreme survival states are unknown. The African turquoise killifish has evolved diapause as a form of suspended development to survive the complete drought that occurs every year in its habitat. Here we show that many gene duplicates – paralogs – exhibit specialized expression in diapause versus normal development in the African turquoise killifish. Surprisingly, paralogs with specialized expression in diapause are evolutionarily very ancient, and they are also present even in vertebrates that do not exhibit diapause. Profiling the chromatin accessibility landscape among different fish species reveals an evolutionarily recent increase in chromatin accessibility at these very ancient paralogs, suggesting rewiring of their regulatory landscape. The increase in chromatin accessibility in the African turquoise killifish is linked to the presence of new binding sites for transcription factors (e.g., FOXO, REST, and PPAR), due to both de novo mutations and transposable element insertion. Interestingly, accessible chromatin regions in diapause are enriched for lipid metabolism genes. By performing lipidomics in different fish species, we uncover a specific lipid profile in African turquoise killifish embryos in diapause. Notably, select very long-chain fatty acids are high in diapause, suggesting they may be used for long-term survival in this state. Together, our multi-omic analysis indicates that diapause is driven by regulatory innovation of very ancient gene programs that are critical for survival. Our work also suggests a mechanism for how complex adaptations evolve in nature and offers strategies by which a suspended animation program could be reactivated in other species for long-term preservation.

Introduction

Extremophiles – species that live in extreme environments – have evolved unique adaptations for survival. Understanding how extreme adaptations evolve can reveal new pathways with important ramifications for survival in all organisms. The African turquoise killifish Nothobranchius furzeri is an extremophile for embryo survival. This vertebrate species lives in ephemeral ponds in Zimbabwe and Mozambique that completely dry up for ~8 months each year (1). To survive this annual drought, the African turquoise killifish has evolved two key adaptations: a rapid life to successfully reproduce during the rainy season and a form of long suspended animation, with embryos entering diapause and subsisting in the mud during the dry season (2–5). Diapause embryos survive for months even years – longer than adult life – without any detectable tradeoff for future life (6). Remarkably, diapause embryos already have complex organs and tissues, including a developing brain and heart (6). Hence, diapause provides a unique form of long-term protection to a complex organism.

Like other suspended animation states (hibernation, torpor), diapause is a multifaceted and active adaptation. Diapause also exists in other vertebrate species, including mammals (e.g., bear, roe deer, mice) (7). As diapause is extreme in the African turquoise killifish, this species provides a model to understand the mechanism and evolution of this suspended animation trait in vertebrates. Many genes involved in chromatin remodeling, metabolism and stress resistance are upregulated in killifish (6, 8, 9). Yet, how such an extreme and coordinated program evolved in nature is unknown. Using the lens of evolution to understand diapause could uncover new protective mechanisms for long-term survival and offer a framework for the evolution of extreme adaptations in nature.

Paralogs that specialize for expression in diapause are evolutionarily very ancient

We asked when the genes expressed in diapause originated in evolutionary time. To this end, we focused on paralogs – duplicated copies of genes (10, 11). Paralogs are the primary mechanism by which new genes originate and specialize for new functions or states (12, 13) (Fig. 1A). Paralogs also allow for a precise timing of the evolutionary origin of specific genes and they could help explain how the killifish genome can support two seemingly antagonistic traits – rapid life vs. suspended animation. Using phylogenetic inference (see Methods), we find that the African turquoise killifish genome contains 20,091 paralog pairs. We used our previously generated RNA-seq datasets of development and diapause in the African turquoise killifish (6) to analyze if the expression pattern of paralogs has diverged in diapause versus normal development states. Interestingly, many paralog pairs show opposing expression, with one gene in the paralog pair highly expressed in diapause (‘diapause-specialized gene’ e.g., the chromatin modifier EZH1) and the other gene in the paralog pair highly expressed in development (‘development-specialized gene’ e.g., the chromatin modifier EZH2) (Fig. 1B and fig. S1). Overall, 6,247 paralog pairs show expression specialization in diapause versus development state (Fig. 1C and fig. S1, Data Files S1 and S2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Specialization of very ancient paralogs for expression in diapause in African turquoise killifish.

(A) Schematic of paralog specialization after gene duplication. After duplication from the same ancestral gene, genes from a paralog gene pair can specialize for different functions or states (e.g., diapause vs. development). (B) Examples of a paralog gene pair, with specialized expression of gene 1 in diapause (blue, EZH1) and gene 2 in development (yellow, EZH2) in the African turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri). Bars represent mean expression level (normalized DESeq2 count) across replicates in diapause or development state. Dots show normalized DESeq2 counts in each replicate. Error bar is standard error of mean (SEM). Corrected P-values (median from pairwise comparisons) from DESeq2 Wald test. (C) Box plots showing expression levels (normalized DESeq2 counts) of all the specialized paralog pairs in diapause and development in the African turquoise killifish genome. Boxes show the median and interquartile ranges, and whiskers indicate maximum 1.5 interquartile range. Gene 1 of the paralog pair has a higher expression on average in diapause (blue) compared to development (yellow), whereas gene 2 has a higher expression on average in development (yellow) compared to diapause (blue). P-values from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. (D) Schematic for binning paralog duplication time into 3 categories based on OrthoFinder pipeline with 71 species (see Methods and fig. S2 for complete tree). Divergence time estimates are from species tree in Ensembl. Binned categories include genes that were duplicated in the common ancestor of (1) all vertebrates or earlier (very ancient, > 473 million years [MY]), (2) all fish (ancient, 111-473 MY), and (3) all killifish or African turquoise killifish exclusively (recent/very recent, 0-111 MY). (E) Fraction of total paralog pairs within each of the very ancient (left), ancient (middle), and recent/very recent (right) binned categories. Violin plots represent the distribution of observed vs expected specialized paralog fractions generated through 10,000 bootstrapped random sampling. Median and quartiles are indicated by dashed lines. The enrichment of diapause-specialized paralogs pairs within each bin is compared to genome-wide expectation (see Methods). Compared to the reference, paralogs with specialization in diapause are enriched among genes with very ancient duplication times and depleted among genes with ancient and recent/very recent duplication times respectively. P-values from Chi-square test.

We next asked whether paralogs that exhibit expression specialization in diapause are evolutionarily recent or ancient. Diapause in the African turquoise killifish is a relatively recent specialization that evolved less than 18 million years (MY) ago (14). To date the paralogs, we generated a paralog classification pipeline to identify the evolutionary time when each of the African turquoise killifish paralogs originate compared to other species (Fig. 1D and fig. S2) (15). We distinguished i) very ancient paralogs (shared with all vertebrates, including mammals) that originated more than 473 MY ago, ii) ancient paralogs (shared with all other fish) that originated between ~111-473 MY ago, and iii) recent/very recent paralogs (killifish/African turquoise killifish specific) that originated less than ~111 MY ago (Fig. 1D). Surprisingly, very ancient paralogs were significantly more likely to specialize for diapause compared to the genome-wide average, even though diapause originated recently (Fig. 1E). In contrast, ancient and especially recent/very recent (killifish-specific) paralogs were significantly less likely to specialize for diapause compared the genome-wide average, even though they originated around the time when diapause evolved (Fig. 1E). Consistently, paralogs that originate from very ancient vertebrate-specific whole genome duplication or ancient small-scale duplications were more likely to specialize for diapause (fig. S3). The enrichment for very ancient paralog pairs for specialization in diapause was robust to varying outgroups, phylogeny, method to identify paralogs, and paralog family size (fig. S4, A to E). As a specificity control, such an enrichment was not observed for paralogs that are expressed at the same level during development and diapause (in fact, those exhibited a depletion for very ancient paralogs) (fig. S4F). The genes specialized for expression in diapause did not exhibit increased positive selection at the protein level, raising the possibility of regulatory rewiring (fig. S4G). Thus, very ancient paralogs are co-opted in diapause, suggesting that ancestral programs are harnessed for this suspended animation state – perhaps by remodeling of the regulatory landscape.

Very ancient paralogs also specialize in diapause in other killifish species with diapause

Many killifish species populate the world, and their ability to undergo diapause is linked to their environment. Killifish species that live in ephemeral ponds exhibit diapause (e.g., African turquoise killifish, South American killifish), whereas killifish species that live in constant water do not undergo diapause, and instead they continuously develop (e.g., red-striped killifish and lyretail killifish, both of which are from Africa) (16–19) (Fig. 2A). To assess whether the specialization of ancient paralogs in diapause is generalizable to other species that evolved diapause independently, we used available RNA-seq data from diapause and development in the South American killifish with diapause, Austrofundulus limnaeus (9). We also generated new RNA-seq data from the developing embryos of the red-striped killifish Aphyosemion striatum and the lyretail killifish Aphyosemion australe – the closest relatives of the African turquoise killifish N. furzeri but without diapause (Fig. 2A). We found that in the South American killifish, paralogs also showed specialized expression in diapause versus development (Fig. 2, B and C, and fig. S5), and that their specialized expression correlated with that of paralogs in the African turquoise killifish (Fig. 2D and fig. S6, A and B). In contrast, killifish species without diapause expressed both paralogs during development (fig. S6C). Importantly, paralogs with specific expression in diapause in the South American killifish were also enriched for very ancient gene duplicates (Fig. 2E). Collectively, these results indicate that very ancient paralog pairs have been repeatedly co-opted for specialized expression in diapause during evolution. Together, our observations also raise the possibility that the recent specialization for diapause is driven at least in part by regulatory innovation of very ancient paralog pairs.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Very ancient paralogs also specialize for expression in diapause in other killifish species with diapause.

(A) Experimental design for analysis of RNA-seq datasets either publicly available (square) or de-novo generated for this study (circles). Killifish species are from Africa (with and without diapause) and South America (with diapause). Medaka and zebrafish are other teleost fish without diapause. The development stage (yellow square) in the South American killifish corresponds to post-diapause development. Pre-Dia, pre-diapause; Dia, diapause; Dev, development; 6d, 6 days in diapause; 1m, 1 month in diapause. (B) Examples of paralog gene pair, with specialized expression of gene 1 in diapause (blue, EZH1) and gene 2 in development (yellow, EZH2) in South American killifish (Austrofundulus limnaeus). Gene names displayed are the names assigned to the ortholog in African turquoise killifish. Bars represent the mean expression level (normalized DESeq2 count) across replicates in diapause or post-diapause development state. Error bar is standard error of mean (SEM). Each dot represents the normalized expression level for all sample replicates in diapause or post diapause development. P-values from DESeq2 Wald test. (C) Box plots showing the expression levels (normalized DESeq2 counts) of all the specialized paralog pairs in diapause and development in South American killifish. Boxes show the median and interquartile ranges, and whiskers indicate maximum 1.5 interquartile range. Gene 1 of the paralog pair has a higher expression on average in diapause (blue) compared to development (yellow), whereas gene 2 has a higher expression on average in development (yellow) compared to diapause (blue). P-values from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. (D) Spearman’s rank correlation between ortholog genes that change with diapause in African turquoise killifish and South American killifish. Dots represent the fold change values of ortholog genes in diapause compared to development in the two species. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ) and P-values from t-test are shown on the plot. (E) Fraction of the total paralog pairs within each of the very ancient (left), ancient (middle), and recent/very recent (right) binned categories as described in Fig. 1D. Violin plots represent the distribution of observed vs expected specialized paralog fractions generated through 10,000 bootstrapped random sampling. Median and quartiles are indicated by dashed lines. The enrichment of diapause-specialized paralogs pairs within each bin is compared to genome-wide expectation (reference). Compared to the reference, paralogs with specialization in diapause are enriched among genes with very ancient duplication times and depleted among genes with ancient and recent or very recent duplication times respectively. P-values from Chi-square test.

Evolutionarily recent remodeling of the chromatin landscape at very ancient paralogs

To characterize the regulatory landscape of the paralogs that specialize in diapause during evolution, we profiled the chromatin accessibility landscape in different species of killifish. We performed ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing), which assesses chromatin accessibility genome-wide (20), on embryos during diapause and development in killifish species with diapause (African turquoise killifish, South American killifish) and embryos during development in killifish species without diapause (lyretail killifish and red-striped killifish) at a similar developmental stage (Fig. 3A). We also used available ATAC-seq data for medaka and zebrafish development (21). We verified the quality of our ATAC-seq samples by transcription start site enrichment of open chromatin and fragment size periodicity (See Methods, fig. S8). Chromatin states easily separated diapause and development embryos by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in the African turquoise killifish (Fig. 3B). Chromatin states also separated diapause and developmental samples of different killifish species (Fig. 3B). In the African turquoise killifish, 6,490 genomic regions were differentially accessible in diapause compared to development genome-wide (fig. S7A, Data Files S1 and S3), and they were located mostly in promoter, intronic, or distal intergenic (e.g., enhancer) regions (fig. S7B). There was a positive correlation between chromatin accessibility and gene expression levels in diapause in the African turquoise killifish (fig. S7, C and D). Together, these results indicate that our datasets for chromatin state landscape in diapause and development in several killifish species are of good quality.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3. Evolutionarily recent remodeling of genome-wide chromatin landscape drives specialized expression of very ancient paralogs in diapause.

(A) Experimental design for the ATAC-seq datasets either publicly available (squares) or de novo generated in this study (circles) (see also Data File S2). Pre-Dia, pre-diapause; Dia, diapause; Dev, development; 6d, 6 days in diapause; 1m, 1 month in diapause. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) on all chromatin accessibility regions in each species group: African turquoise killifish only (left), all killifish species (center), and diapause-capable killifish (right). Each point represents the consensus ATAC-seq peaks (chromatin accessibility) from an individual replicate of a given species at a given developmental or diapause state. Percentage of the variance explained by each Principal Component (PC) is shown in parentheses. (C) Conservation analysis of genomic sequence and chromatin accessibility at very ancient paralogs with specialization in diapause vs. development. Left: Schematic of the analysis. Right: Percentage (e.g., conservation) of alignable regions containing diapause-specific chromatin accessibility (upper) and the conservation of diapause-specific chromatin accessibility (lower) near specialized ancient paralogs (see also fig. S10). While the majority of genomic sequences are ancient, the chromatin accessibility at those peaks evolved recently in the African turquoise killifish. P-values from Chi-square test. (D) Genome browser (IGV) visualization of chromatin accessibility regions (ATAC-seq peaks) at the promoter of genes from a very ancient paralog pair, with one gene specialized for expression in diapause (DNAJA4) and the other in development (DNAJA2). Replicates within each condition were aggregated by summation for visualization. Blue boxes and lines represent genomic features (exons and introns, respectively). (E) Genome-browser (IGV) visualization of representative diapause-specific chromatin accessibility regions that are: ancient/very ancient (conserved across killifish and medaka or zebrafish; left), recent (conserved in killifish species; middle), or very recent (specific to African turquoise killifish; right). Blue boxes and lines at the bottom represent genomic features for the closest gene (exons and introns, respectively). To generate tracks, RPKM-normalized reads were summed across replicates and biological timepoints (e.g., diapause and development separately) to obtain single tracks for each species.

We next examined accessible chromatin regions (ATAC-seq peaks) at paralogs that are differentially expressed in diapause versus development (Fig. 3C) (e.g., DNAJA4 and DNAJA2, Fig. 3D and fig. S1B). As paralogs that specialize in diapause are very ancient (> 473 MY), we therefore asked when chromatin accessibility occurred in evolutionary time (Fig. 3C and fig. S9). To quantify chromatin accessibility over evolutionary time, we developed a pipeline to identify the relative evolutionary origin of ATAC-seq peak based on multi-genome alignment (see Methods), and classified each ATAC-seq peak as i) ancient/very ancient (i.e. chromatin accessible in all fish species evaluated, such as CBX8) (Fig. 3E and fig. S9), ii) recent (i.e. chromatin accessible only in killifish species, such as HNRNPA3), and very recent (chromatin accessible only in the African turquoise killifish, such as OSBPL5) (Fig. 3E and fig. S9). Interestingly, most regulatory regions of very ancient paralogs (> 473 MY) that are differentially regulated in diapause exhibited chromatin accessibility very recently (~18 MY), only in the African turquoise killifish (Fig. 3C and fig. S10). The very recent chromatin accessibility at very ancient paralogs specialized in diapause was generalizable to non-paralog genes (fig. S10A) and was more pronounced at distal regulatory elements (likely enhancers) (fig. S10B). Thus, the African turquoise killifish exhibits an evolutionary recent remodeling of the chromatin accessibility landscape at very ancient genes.

Mechanisms underlying the evolution of chromatin accessibility in diapause

What are the mechanisms connecting evolutionary recent chromatin accessibility with diapause? Chromatin regions that opened recently in diapause paralogs in the African turquoise killifish were enriched for transcription factor motifs, including REST, NR2F2, Forkhead transcription factors (e.g., FOXA1, FOXO3), and PPAR (e.g., PPARA) (Fig. 4A). Most diapause-specific transcription factor binding motifs were only enriched in the African turquoise killifish, but not in other closely related fish without diapause (Fig. 4B and fig. S11). Thus, these transcription factor motifs arose very recently in the African turquoise killifish after divergence from other killifish species without diapause and could underlie the evolutionarily recent opening of chromatin at very ancient paralogs.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4. Mechanisms underlying the evolution of chromatin accessibility in diapause at specialized paralogs.

(A) Left: Word cloud for transcription-factor binding motifs enriched in the diapause-specific chromatin accessible regions (ATAC-seq peaks) at specialized paralogs using HOMER. Right: Motif logos generated by weblogo for selected transcription factor examples are shown on the right. Y-axis is formatted using informational content (i.e., bits) which scales based on single-base overrepresentation in the binding sequence (0: bases are represented equally at 25% each in reference sequences; 2: a single base dominates the entirety of reference sequences at 100%). (B) Conservation in other fish species of transcription-factor binding motifs enriched in the diapause-specific chromatin accessible regions in the African turquoise killifish. The majority of diapause-specific motifs are very recent (i.e., specific to the African turquoise killifish) and not enriched in killifish species without diapause. Selected representative motifs are highlighted (see also figs. S11, S17). (C) Schematic of two possible mechanisms for the evolution of the diapause-specific transcription factor binding motifs in the African turquoise killifish genome. Upper: Gradual mutations paired with selective pressure leads to the formation of binding sites for specific transcription factors and accompanying chromatin accessibility. Lower: A site experiences a transposable element (TE) insertion event, providing a novel sequence that contains a binding site for a specific transcription factor and accompanying chromatin accessibility. (D) Contribution (in percentage) of the two possible evolutionary mechanisms (mutation and TE insertion) for motif evolution in diapause-specific chromatin at specialized paralogs. Diapause-specific motifs likely acquired by mutation in the African turquoise killifish (dark green) are those that are expected to bind their transcription factors exclusively in the African turquoise killifish based on the HOMER log odds ratio binding criteria (see Methods). Conserved motifs likely acquired by mutation in multiple species (light green) are those that are expected to bind their transcription factor motifs in at least one other fish species evaluated. Diapause-specific motifs likely acquired by TE insertion (brown) are those that overlap with an annotated TE sequence and are expected to bind their transcription factor exclusively in the African turquoise killifish. Conserved motifs likely acquired by TE insertion (light brown) are those that overlap with a TE sequence in the African turquoise killifish and at least one other species in addition to being expected to bind their transcription factor in both the African turquoise killifish and at least one additional species. A large majority of motifs likely evolved through mutations in the African turquoise killifish. (E) Example of a transcription factor binding motif that likely evolved via mutation: FOXO3 binding motif in a diapause-specific chromatin accessible region of the African turquoise killifish genome near GPC3 (LOC107379575) and aligned regions in other fish species. Aligned sequences colored based on the similarity to the canonical FOXO3 motif from HOMER (top track). (F) Aggregated informational content across all FOXO3 transcription factor binding sites in diapause-specific accessible chromatin regions and aligned regions in other species. Y-axis is formatted using informational content (i.e., bits). The African turquoise killifish motif exhibits greater similarity to the canonical FOXO3 binding motif (see also fig. S12). (G) Fraction of diapause-specific chromatin accessible regions under positive selection in the African turquoise killifish (see Methods) at FDR = 0.1, which are enriched for selected motifs (e.g., REST, FOXO3, PPARA). (H) Enrichment or depletion of specific transposable elements (TEs) in the diapause-specific chromatin accessible regions (ATAC-seq peaks) in the African turquoise killifish genome as compared to the overall genomic abundance of the given TE (“Genome”), compared to the abundance of the given TE in all chromatin accessible regions (“Chromatin”), and compared to the abundance of the given TE in size-matched control regions 10 kb away from ATAC-seq peak of interest (“Control loci”). (I) Example of a diapause-specific chromatin accessibility region containing a PPARA binding site overlapping with a TE. Almost all TE-derived motifs are specific to the African turquoise killifish.

New transcription binding motifs can arise de novo by point mutation or transposable element (TE) insertion (22, 23) (Fig. 4C). A majority (81%) of the transcription factor binding motifs associated with diapause accessible chromatin at specialized paralogs in the African turquoise killifish evolved de novo, via mutation of the ancestral sequence (Fig. 4D). For example, transcription factor motifs (e.g., FOXO3 motifs) were canonical binding sites (as defined by HOMER (24)) in the African turquoise killifish sequence but were slightly divergent in closely related fish without diapause and even more divergent or even absent in more distant fish species (Fig. 4, E and F, and fig. S12). Importantly, we found a signature of positive selection (25) at many of the diapause-specific accessible chromatin regions in the African turquoise killifish, with enrichment for binding motifs for FOXO3, REST, and PPAR (Fig. 4G and fig. S13). Thus, the African turquoise killifish may have selected for canonical transcription factor binding motifs at regulatory regions of genes beneficial for diapause.

Intriguingly, some binding motifs associated with diapause in the African turquoise killifish paralogs overlapped with transposable elements and were unique to this species (Fig. 4D). While overlaps with transposable elements represents a minority of cases (5%) (Fig. 4D), transposable elements can deliver a transcription factor binding motif to new regulatory sites faster than gradual mutation and selection. As transposable elements have exploded in the African turquoise killifish genome (26), they may represent an evolutionary mechanism to co-opt genes into the diapause expression program. Several transposable element families (e.g., DNA transposons and LINEs) were highly enriched at accessible chromatin regions in diapause in the African turquoise killifish (Fig. 4H). In some cases, these regions contained both a transposable element and a transcription factor binding site (e.g., PPAR) (Fig. 4I and fig. S14). Hence, transcription factor binding motifs underlying diapause-specialized paralogs may have originated not only through mutation and selection but also via a recent burst, in the African turquoise killifish, of transposon-mediated reshuffling.

Functional enrichment and lipidomics reveal specific lipids in the diapause state

We asked whether ancient paralogs that are recently repurposed for diapause in the African turquoise killifish are associated with a specific biological function. Analysis of gene expression and chromatin accessibility at diapause-specific paralogs showed enrichment of several functions related to lipid metabolism (e.g., lipid storage, very long chain fatty acid metabolism and regulation of fatty acid beta oxidation) (Fig. 5A, Data Files S5 and S6). Both gene expression and chromatin accessibility datasets showed enrichment of upstream regulators of lipid metabolism (e.g., FOXO1 (27)) or transcriptional sensors of fatty acids (e.g., PPAR) (28) (Fig. 5B, Data File S7). These observations raise the possibility that lipids play an important role in diapause.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5. Functional enrichment and lipidomics reveal specific lipids in the diapause state.

(A) Gene Ontology enrichment for the lipid-related terms enriched in both expressed genes (diapause specialized paralogs) and chromatin accessible regions in diapause (see Data File S4 for full list). (B) Selected upstream regulators of the paralog genes specialized in diapause using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (see Data File S4 for full list). Regulators related to lipid metabolism are highlighted (red arrows). Several upstream regulatory transcription factors in this analysis overlap with transcription factor binding motifs enriched in diapause-specific chromatin accessible regions (see Fig. 3). (C) Experimental design for untargeted lipidomics in the African turquoise killifish (with diapause) and the red-striped killifish (without diapause). The two development and diapause time points in the African turquoise and pre-diapause in red-striped killifish are identical to those for ATAC-seq (Fig. 3A). (D) Principal component analysis (PCA) on the estimated concentrations for all detected lipids for the African turquoise killifish only (left) and for both killifish (right). Each point represents an individual replicate from a given species at a given developmental or diapause stage. Variance explained by each Principal Component (PC) is shown in parentheses. (E) Heatmap representing the fold change of significant triglycerides between diapause vs. development in the African turquoise killifish (upper) and between the African turquoise killifish vs. red-striped killifish (development only, lower). Fold change values are plotted between each pair-wise comparison between diapause and development time points, or the two development or diapause time points. For most triglycerides, levels are higher at both 1-month (1m) and 6-days (6d) diapause relative to development. The bottom panel shows the fold change values of the same lipids in the African turquoise killifish compared to the red-striped killifish; levels of most triglycerides are higher in African turquoise killifish. Green boxes and text below heatmap blocks denote very long-chain fatty acids among displayed triglycerides species. (F) Lipid abundance counts for very long-chain fatty acids in triglycerides (TGs) in the African turquoise killifish during development (yellow) and diapause (blue) timepoints. Bars represent mean values in each condition error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). Dots represent individual replicates. P-values from Welch’s t-test. (G) Normalized lipid abundance counts for very long-chain fatty acids in triglycerides in the African turquoise killifish (left) and red-striped killifish (right) during matched developmental timepoints (Pre-Dia). Data represented as in F. P-value from Welch’s t-test. (H) Putative model for the evolution of diapause-specialized paralogs in the African turquoise killifish, in which very ancient paralogs (>473 MY) have undergone regulatory rewiring (TF binding site occurrence and chromatin-accessibility change) that generates a diapause-specialized (blue) and development-specialized (yellow) gene in the paralog pair. Some of these diapause expressed paralog genes are important for lipid metabolism, such as the processing of very long-chain triglycerides. These very long-chain triglycerides are abundant in the African turquoise killifish and accumulate in diapause, and they could be critical for long-term survival.

While some lipids and metabolites have been examined in killifish embryos and adults (29–31), a systematic profiling of lipids in diapause vs. development in killifish species with and without diapause has not been done. We therefore performed untargeted lipidomics on the African turquoise killifish embryos at different times: pre-diapause and diapause at different times (6 days and 1 month). As a comparison, we also performed lipidomics on embryos of another killifish species that does not undergo diapause (red-striped killifish) (Fig. 5C). The lipidome separated diapause from development in the African turquoise killifish and development in the red-striped killifish by PCA (Fig. 5D). Glycerophospholipids (e.g., phosphatidylcholines [PC]), which are membrane lipids, and triglycerides (TGs), which are storage lipids, were both changed in diapause in comparison to development stages (fig. S15A). The triglyceride changes in diapause are consistent with expression differences of genes, including specialized paralogs, encoding triglyceride metabolism enzymes and regulators (fig. S15B). Interestingly, we observed an enrichment of TGs containing very long chain fatty acids (fatty acids with chain lengths of 22) in diapause compared to development, and the majority of these very long chain fatty acids have 5 (docosapentaenoic acid, DPA) and 6 (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) double bonds (Fig. 5, E and F). The same TGs with very long-chain fatty acids were also more abundant in African turquoise killifish embryos, even at pre-diapause, than in red-striped killifish at the equivalent state of development (Fig. 5G and fig. S15, C and D). As very long-chain fatty acids are processed by peroxisomes and subsequently by mitochondria to produce energy (32), they may serve as a long-term energy reserve for diapause. Other lipids, such as many ether-linked glycerophospholipids (plasmalogens), which can protect brain and hearts from oxidative stress (33–35), are more abundant in diapause than development and higher in the African turquoise killifish compared to the red-striped killifish (fig. S15D, Data File S8). Collectively, these data suggest that the African turquoise killifish has evolved to pack specific lipids, including long-chain fatty acids and membrane lipids with antioxidant properties, in their embryos. The rewiring of key transcription factor binding sites (e.g., FOXO1 or PPAR binding sites) at specialized paralogs (and other genes) involved in lipid metabolism could modulate lipid management for long-term protection and efficient storage and usage of specific fatty acids (Fig. 5H).

Discussion

Our study shows for the first time that although diapause evolved recently (less than 18 MY ago), the paralogs that specialized for diapause are ancestral and shared by most vertebrates (>473 MY old). This paralog specialization in the African turquoise killifish diapause is likely achieved by recent co-opting of conserved transcription factors (such as REST, FOXOs, and PPAR) and repurposing of their regulatory landscape by mutations and selection and transposon element insertion. Our multi-omics analysis of the diapause state (transcriptomics, chromatin states, lipidomics) and comparative analysis with several fish species suggests a model for diapause evolution via very ancient paralog-specialization. After duplication in the ancestor of most vertebrates, these very ancient paralogs likely specialize in the transient response to harsh environment (e.g., transient lack of food or temperature change, or other changes), which ensures their long-term maintenance in the genome. When the ancestors of African turquoise killifish transitioned to ephemeral ponds over 18 million years (14), these paralogs evolved new transcription factor binding motifs driving further specialization, notably for lipid metabolism genes, for survival under extreme conditions in diapause (Fig 5H).

Elucidating the mechanisms underlying the origin of complex adaptations and phenotypes (e.g., ‘suspended animation’, novel cell types/tissues, etc.) is a central challenge of evolutionary biology (36). Gene duplication is the primary mechanism to generate new genes, and these act as substrate to evolve new functions. For example, ancient gene duplicates (paralogs) are specialized for expression in different tissues (37, 38). Ancient gene duplicates (paralogs) can also contribute to the evolution of new organs such as electric organ (39) and placenta (40). Gene duplicates have also been correlated with exceptional resistance to cancer in long-lived species (41–43). The specialization of paralogs might also explain how the African turquoise killifish genome can support two seemingly antagonistic complex traits – e.g., rapid life and long suspended animation. However, the mechanisms of how divergence of duplicated genes or paralogs contribute to the evolution of complex adaptations are still poorly understood. Emerging evidence, including our study, suggests that complex adaptations can arise by rewiring gene expression by unique regulatory elements (22, 23, 44, 45). Our results indicate that such a rewiring can be achieved using de novo regulatory elements and in some cases transposon insertion.

Cis-regulatory elements such as enhancers and promoters are known to evolve rapidly (46–49), and they can in turn facilitate complex adaptations with the same set of conserved genes. Transposon insertion can be even faster in promoting the rearrangement of regulatory regions (50–57). Rapid reshuffling of regulatory regions by mutation or transposon insertion provides a framework for the evolution of complex trait in nature. Such a mechanism could extend to the evolution of other complex traits, including regenerative capacity, which involves new enhancers in killifish (58), although other mechanisms may also contribute, including positive selection of specific genes (8, 9, 26, 59–61).

Our work also reveals specific genes and lipids that could be critical for long-term survival in suspended development. Lipids that accumulate in a state of ‘suspended animation’ (e.g., very long-chain fatty acids) could serve as key substrates for long-lasting survival (62, 63). Alternatively, they could also serve as new signals to affect specific aspects of the diapause state (in addition to known signals in other species, such as vitamin D or dafachronic acid in the South American killifish (64) and in C. elegans, respectively) (65, 66). The pathways and regulatory mechanisms we identified could also apply to other states of suspended animation and even to adult longevity. For example, transcription factors whose motifs are enriched in the diapause state (e.g., FOXOs, PPARs) are genetically required for suspended animation states, such as C. elegans dauer (67–69), and are expressed in mammalian hibernation (70). Furthermore, lipids and lipid metabolism genes are expressed differentially in mammalian diapause (71) as well as hibernation and torpor (63, 72, 73), and are under positive selection in exceptionally long-lived mammals (74). Finally, several of the transcription factors we identified (e.g., FOXOs, REST) are genetically implicated in longevity in C. elegans and flies (75–80). Our results place these previous genetic and expression findings in a natural context and reveal how selective pressure can co-opt key metabolic programs to achieve extreme phenotypes. These observations also raise the possibility that a core program of lipid metabolism genes, regulated by specific transcription factors, can be deployed to achieve metabolic remodeling and stress resistance in diverse contexts, including in adults. Our study provides a new multi-omic resource for understanding the regulation and evolution of suspended animation states (hibernation, torpor, diapause). It also opens the possibility for strategies, including lipid-based interventions, to promote long-term tissue preservation and counter age-related diseases.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Material and Methods

References 81–131

Figs. S1 to S17

Table S1

Data Files S1 to S8

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We particularly thank J. Pritchard for invaluable discussion on paralogs and evolutionary analyses and for feedback on the manuscript. We thank J. Podrabsky and J. Wagner for providing A. limnaeus embryos and helpful suggestions with husbandry. We thank M. Robinson-Rechavi and J. Liu for help with positive selection analysis in ATAC-seq peaks. We thank J. Miklas, X. Zhao, K. Papsdorf, T. Ruetz, J. Chen, H. Fraser, G. Bejerano, S. Goenka, H. Chen, and all Brunet lab members for helpful discussion or comments. We thank C. Bedbrook, E. Sun, F. Boos, T. Ruetz, and X. Zhao for independent code-checking. Funding: This work was supported by the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research (A.B.), a fellowship from Stanford Center for Computational, Evolutionary, and Human Genomics (P.P.S.), and a National Science Foundation graduate fellowship (G.A.R.). Author contributions: P.P.S. designed the project with help from G.A.R. and A.B.. P.P.S. performed all the killifish experiments and computational analyses unless otherwise indicated. G.A.R. generated all ATAC-seq libraries, performed multi-genome integration of ATAC-seq and transposon analyses. K.C. and M.E. generated the lipidomics data and helped with the analysis under the supervision of M.P.S.. C-K.H. provided African turquoise killifish RNA-seq datasets pre-publication. P.P.S. wrote the manuscript with the help from G.A.R. and A.B.. All the authors provided intellectual input and commented on the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    A. Cellerino, D. R. Valenzano, M. Reichard, From the bush to the bench: the annual Nothobranchius fishes as a new model system in biology. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 91, 511–533 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    M. Platzer, C. Englert, Nothobranchius furzeri: A Model for Aging Research and More. Trends Genet 32, 543–552 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    M. Vrtilek, J. Zak, M. Psenicka, M. Reichard, Extremely rapid maturation of a wild African annual fish. Curr Biol 28, R822–R824 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    C. K. Hu, A. Brunet, The African turquoise killifish: A research organism to study vertebrate aging and diapause. Aging Cell 17, e12757 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    M. Reichard, M. Polacik, Nothobranchius furzeri, an ‘instant’ fish from an ephemeral habitat. Elife 8, (2019).
  6. 6.↵
    C. K. Hu et al., Vertebrate diapause preserves organisms long term through Polycomb complex members. Science 367, 870–874 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    M. B. Renfree, J. C. Fenelon, The enigma of embryonic diapause. Development 144, 3199–3210 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    K. Reichwald et al., Insights into Sex Chromosome Evolution and Aging from the Genome of a Short-Lived Fish. Cell 163, 1527–1538 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    J. T. Wagner et al., The genome of Austrofundulus limnaeus offers insights into extreme vertebrate stress tolerance and embryonic development. BMC Genomics 19, 155 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Y. Van de Peer, E. Mizrachi, K. Marchal, The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet 18, 411–424 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    L. Z. Holland, Evolution of new characters after whole genome duplications: insights from amphioxus. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24, 101–109 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    S. Ohno, U. Wolf, N. B. Atkin, Evolution from fish to mammals by gene duplication. Hereditas 59, 169–187 (1968).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    G. C. Conant, K. H. Wolfe, Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet 9, 938–950 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    R. Cui et al., Ancestral transoceanic colonization and recent population reduction in a nonannual killifish from the Seychelles archipelago. Mol Ecol, (2021).
  15. 15.↵
    D. M. Emms, S. Kelly, OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 20, 238 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    W. J. Murphy, G. E. Collier, A molecular phylogeny for aplocheiloid fishes (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): the role of vicariance and the origins of annualism. Mol Biol Evol 14, 790–799 (1997).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.
    A. I. Furness, D. N. Reznick, M. S. Springer, R. W. Meredith, Convergent evolution of alternative developmental trajectories associated with diapause in African and South American killifish. Proc Biol Sci 282, (2015).
  18. 18.
    K. L. M. Martin, J. E. Podrabsky, Hit pause: Developmental arrest in annual killifishes and their close relatives. Dev Dyn 246, 858–866 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    J. E. Podrabsky, M. Arezo, Annual killifishes as model systems for advancing understanding of evolution and developmental biology. Dev Dyn 246, 778 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    J. D. Buenrostro, P. G. Giresi, L. C. Zaba, H. Y. Chang, W. J. Greenleaf, Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    F. Marletaz et al., Amphioxus functional genomics and the origins of vertebrate gene regulation. Nature 564, 64–70 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    M. Rebeiz, M. Tsiantis, Enhancer evolution and the origins of morphological novelty. Curr Opin Genet Dev 45, 115–123 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    E. B. Chuong, N. C. Elde, C. Feschotte, Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits. Nat Rev Genet 18, 71–86 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    S. Heinz et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    J. Liu, M. Robinson-Rechavi, Robust inference of positive selection on regulatory sequences in the human brain. Sci Adv 6, (2020).
  26. 26.↵
    R. Cui et al., Relaxed Selection Limits Lifespan by Increasing Mutation Load. Cell 178, 385–399 e320 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    S. Kousteni, FoxO1, the transcriptional chief of staff of energy metabolism. Bone 50, 437–443 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    L. Poulsen, M. Siersbaek, S. Mandrup, PPARs: fatty acid sensors controlling metabolism. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23, 631–639 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    P. F. Almaida-Pagan et al., Age-related changes in mitochondrial membrane composition of Nothobranchius furzeri.: comparison with a longer-living Nothobranchius species. Biogerontology 20, 83–92 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.
    R. Dabrowski, R. Ripa, C. Latza, A. Annibal, A. Antebi, Optimization of mass spectrometry settings for steroidomic analysis in young and old killifish. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 4089–4099 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    D. E. Zajic, J. E. Podrabsky, Metabolomics analysis of annual killifish (Austrofundulus limnaeus) embryos during aerial dehydration stress. Physiol Genomics 52, 408–422 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    M. T. Nakamura, B. E. Yudell, J. J. Loor, Regulation of energy metabolism by long-chain fatty acids. Prog Lipid Res 53, 124–144 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    P. J. Sindelar, Z. Guan, G. Dallner, L. Ernster, The protective role of plasmalogens in iron-induced lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 26, 318–324 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    N. E. Braverman, A. B. Moser, Functions of plasmalogen lipids in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822, 1442–1452 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    S. Paul, G. I. Lancaster, P. J. Meikle, Plasmalogens: A potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative and cardiometabolic disease. Prog Lipid Res 74, 186–195 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    A. Monteiro, O. Podlaha, Wings, horns, and butterfly eyespots: how do complex traits evolve? PLoS Biol 7, e37 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    X. Lan, J. K. Pritchard, Coregulation of tandem duplicate genes slows evolution of subfunctionalization in mammals. Science 352, 1009–1013 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    K. Guschanski, M. Warnefors, H. Kaessmann, The evolution of duplicate gene expression in mammalian organs. Genome Res 27, 1461–1474 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    M. E. Arnegard, D. J. Zwickl, Y. Lu, H. H. Zakon, Old gene duplication facilitates origin and diversification of an innovative communication system--twice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 22172–22177 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    K. Knox, J. C. Baker, Genomic evolution of the placenta using co-option and duplication and divergence. Genome Res 18, 695–705 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    A. Doherty, J. P. de Magalhaes, Has gene duplication impacted the evolution of Eutherian longevity? Aging Cell 15, 978–980 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    J. M. Vazquez, V. J. Lynch, Pervasive duplication of tumor suppressors in Afrotherians during the evolution of large bodies and reduced cancer risk. Elife 10, (2021).
  43. 43.↵
    D. Tejada-Martinez, J. P. de Magalhaes, J. C. Opazo, Positive selection and gene duplications in tumour suppressor genes reveal clues about how cetaceans resist cancer. Proc Biol Sci 288, 20202592 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    F. C. Jones et al., The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484, 55–61 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    D. Villar, P. Flicek, D. T. Odom, Evolution of transcription factor binding in metazoans - mechanisms and functional implications. Nat Rev Genet 15, 221–233 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    J. Vierstra et al., Mouse regulatory DNA landscapes reveal global principles of cis-regulatory evolution. Science 346, 1007–1012 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.
    D. Villar et al., Enhancer evolution across 20 mammalian species. Cell 160, 554–566 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.
    V. B. Indjeian et al., Evolving New Skeletal Traits by cis-Regulatory Changes in Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. Cell 164, 45–56 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    J. P. Verta, F. C. Jones, Predominance of cis-regulatory changes in parallel expression divergence of sticklebacks. Elife 8, (2019).
  50. 50.↵
    V. J. Lynch et al., Ancient transposable elements transformed the uterine regulatory landscape and transcriptome during the evolution of mammalian pregnancy. Cell Rep 10, 551–561 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.
    E. B. Chuong, N. C. Elde, C. Feschotte, Regulatory evolution of innate immunity through co-option of endogenous retroviruses. Science 351, 1083–1087 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.
    J. H. Notwell, T. Chung, W. Heavner, G. Bejerano, A family of transposable elements co-opted into developmental enhancers in the mouse neocortex. Nat Commun 6, 6644 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.
    M. Trizzino et al., Transposable elements are the primary source of novelty in primate gene regulation. Genome Res 27, 1623–1633 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.
    V. Sundaram, J. Wysocka, Transposable elements as a potent source of diverse cis-regulatory sequences in mammalian genomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 375, 20190347 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.
    M. Roller et al., LINE retrotransposons characterize mammalian tissue-specific and evolutionarily dynamic regulatory regions. Genome Biol 22, 62 (2021).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    R. L. Cosby et al., Recurrent evolution of vertebrate transcription factors by transposase capture. Science 371, (2021).
  57. 57.↵
    J. Judd, H. Sanderson, C. Feschotte, Evolution of mouse circadian enhancers from transposable elements. Genome Biol 22, 193 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    W. Wang et al., Changes in regeneration-responsive enhancers shape regenerative capacities in vertebrates. Science 369, (2020).
  59. 59.↵
    D. R. Valenzano et al., The African Turquoise Killifish Genome Provides Insights into Evolution and Genetic Architecture of Lifespan. Cell 163, 1539–1554 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.
    A. Sahm, M. Bens, M. Platzer, A. Cellerino, Parallel evolution of genes controlling mitonuclear balance in short-lived annual fishes. Aging Cell 16, 488–496 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    M. B. Emanuel Barth, Luca Dolfi, Rongfeng Cui, Marco Groth, Roberto Ripa, Aurora Savino, Dario R. Valenzano, Matthias Platzer, Manja Marz, Alessandro Cellerino, Analysis of microRNA expression reveals convergent evolution of the molecular control of diapause in annual fish. DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-744922/v1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    M. Vrtilek, M. Polacik, M. Reichard, The role of energetic reserves during embryonic development of an annual killifish. Dev Dyn 246, 838–847 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    L. Olsen, E. Thum, N. Rohner, Lipid metabolism in adaptation to extreme nutritional challenges. Dev Cell 56, 1417–1429 (2021).
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    A. L. T. Romney, E. M. Davis, M. M. Corona, J. T. Wagner, J. E. Podrabsky, Temperature-dependent vitamin D signaling regulates developmental trajectory associated with diapause in an annual killifish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 12763–12768 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    A. Antebi, W. H. Yeh, D. Tait, E. M. Hedgecock, D. L. Riddle, daf-12 encodes a nuclear receptor that regulates the dauer diapause and developmental age in C. elegans. Genes Dev 14, 1512–1527 (2000).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    B. Gerisch, C. Weitzel, C. Kober-Eisermann, V. Rottiers, A. Antebi, A hormonal signaling pathway influencing C. elegans metabolism, reproductive development, and life span. Dev Cell 1, 841–851 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    C. Kenyon, J. Chang, E. Gensch, A. Rudner, R. Tabtiang, A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366, 461–464 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.
    P. L. Larsen, P. S. Albert, D. L. Riddle, Genes that regulate both development and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139, 1567–1583 (1995).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    S. Gottlieb, G. Ruvkun, daf-2, daf-16 and daf-23: genetically interacting genes controlling Dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 137, 107–120 (1994).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    C. J. Nelson, J. P. Otis, H. V. Carey, A role for nuclear receptors in mammalian hibernation. J Physiol 587, 1863–1870 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    R. Arena et al., Lipid droplets in mammalian eggs are utilized during embryonic diapause. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118, (2021).
  72. 72.↵
    H. T. Jansen et al., Hibernation induces widespread transcriptional remodeling in metabolic tissues of the grizzly bear. Commun Biol 2, 336 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Y. Xu et al., Molecular signatures of mammalian hibernation: comparisons with alternative phenotypes. BMC Genomics 14, 567 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    X. Zhou et al., Beaver and Naked Mole Rat Genomes Reveal Common Paths to Longevity. Cell Rep 32, 107949 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. 75.↵
    K. Lin, J. B. Dorman, A. Rodan, C. Kenyon, daf-16: An HNF-3/forkhead family member that can function to double the life-span of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 278, 1319–1322 (1997).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.
    S. Ogg et al., The Fork head transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans. Nature 389, 994–999 (1997).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.
    M. E. Giannakou et al., Long-lived Drosophila with overexpressed dFOXO in adult fat body. Science 305, 361 (2004).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 78.
    D. S. Hwangbo, B. Gershman, M. P. Tu, M. Palmer, M. Tatar, Drosophila dFOXO controls lifespan and regulates insulin signalling in brain and fat body. Nature 429, 562–566 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.
    T. Lu et al., REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 507, 448–454 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 80.↵
    J. M. Zullo et al., Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST. Nature 574, 359–364 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 25, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of diapause in the African turquoise killifish by remodeling ancient gene regulatory landscape
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evolution of diapause in the African turquoise killifish by remodeling ancient gene regulatory landscape
Param Priya Singh, G. Adam Reeves, Kévin Contrepois, Mathew Ellenberger, Chi-Kuo Hu, Michael P. Snyder, Anne Brunet
bioRxiv 2021.10.25.465616; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.25.465616
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evolution of diapause in the African turquoise killifish by remodeling ancient gene regulatory landscape
Param Priya Singh, G. Adam Reeves, Kévin Contrepois, Mathew Ellenberger, Chi-Kuo Hu, Michael P. Snyder, Anne Brunet
bioRxiv 2021.10.25.465616; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.25.465616

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4105)
  • Biochemistry (8808)
  • Bioengineering (6509)
  • Bioinformatics (23446)
  • Biophysics (11784)
  • Cancer Biology (9199)
  • Cell Biology (13314)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7430)
  • Ecology (11403)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15143)
  • Genetics (10430)
  • Genomics (14036)
  • Immunology (9167)
  • Microbiology (22142)
  • Molecular Biology (8802)
  • Neuroscience (47539)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2489)
  • Physiology (3729)
  • Plant Biology (8076)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)