Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Explaining heterogeneity in medial entorhinal cortex with task-driven neural networks

View ORCID ProfileAran Nayebi, Alexander Attinger, Malcolm G. Campbell, View ORCID ProfileKiah Hardcastle, View ORCID ProfileIsabel I.C. Low, View ORCID ProfileCaitlin S. Mallory, View ORCID ProfileGabriel C. Mel, View ORCID ProfileBen Sorscher, Alex H. Williams, Surya Ganguli, View ORCID ProfileLisa M. Giocomo, View ORCID ProfileDaniel L.K. Yamins
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.30.466617
Aran Nayebi
1Neurosciences Ph.D. Program, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aran Nayebi
  • For correspondence: anayebi@stanford.edu
Alexander Attinger
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malcolm G. Campbell
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiah Hardcastle
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kiah Hardcastle
Isabel I.C. Low
1Neurosciences Ph.D. Program, Stanford University
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
7Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Isabel I.C. Low
Caitlin S. Mallory
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caitlin S. Mallory
Gabriel C. Mel
1Neurosciences Ph.D. Program, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriel C. Mel
Ben Sorscher
4Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ben Sorscher
Alex H. Williams
6Department of Statistics, Stanford University
7Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surya Ganguli
4Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University
7Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University
8Facebook AI Research, Facebook, Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa M. Giocomo
2Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University
7Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa M. Giocomo
Daniel L.K. Yamins
3Department of Computer Science, Stanford University
5Department of Psychology, Stanford University
7Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel L.K. Yamins
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) supports a wide range of navigational and memory related behaviors. Well-known experimental results have revealed specialized cell types in MEC — e.g. grid, border, and head-direction cells — whose highly stereo-typical response profiles are suggestive of the role they might play in supporting MEC functionality. However, the majority of MEC neurons do not exhibit stereotypical firing patterns. How should the response profiles of these more “heterogeneous” cells be described, and how do they contribute to behavior? In this work, we took a computational approach to addressing these questions. We first performed a statistical analysis that shows that heterogeneous MEC cells are just as reliable in their response patterns as the more stereotypical cell types, suggesting that they have a coherent functional role. Next, we evaluated a spectrum of candidate models in terms of their ability to describe the response profiles of both stereotypical and heterogeneous MEC cells. We found that recently developed task-optimized neural network models are substantially better than traditional grid cell-centric models at matching most MEC neuronal response profiles — including those of grid cells themselves — despite not being explicitly trained for this purpose. Specific choices of network architecture (such as gated nonlinearities and an explicit intermediate place cell representation) have an important effect on the ability of the model to generalize to novel scenarios, with the best of these models closely approaching the noise ceiling of the data itself. We then performed “in-silica” experiments on this model to address questions involving the relative functional relevance of various cell types, finding that heterogeneous cells are likely to be just as involved in downstream functional outcomes (such as path integration) as grid and border cells. Finally, inspired by recent data showing that, going beyond their spatial response selectivity, MEC cells are also responsive to non-spatial rewards, we introduce a new MEC model that performs reward-modulated path integration. We find that this unified model matches neural recordings across all variable-reward conditions. Taken together, our results point toward a conceptually principled goal-driven modeling approach for moving future experimental and computational efforts beyond overly-simplistic single-cell stereotypes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://github.com/neuroailab/mec

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 02, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Explaining heterogeneity in medial entorhinal cortex with task-driven neural networks
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Explaining heterogeneity in medial entorhinal cortex with task-driven neural networks
Aran Nayebi, Alexander Attinger, Malcolm G. Campbell, Kiah Hardcastle, Isabel I.C. Low, Caitlin S. Mallory, Gabriel C. Mel, Ben Sorscher, Alex H. Williams, Surya Ganguli, Lisa M. Giocomo, Daniel L.K. Yamins
bioRxiv 2021.10.30.466617; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.30.466617
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Explaining heterogeneity in medial entorhinal cortex with task-driven neural networks
Aran Nayebi, Alexander Attinger, Malcolm G. Campbell, Kiah Hardcastle, Isabel I.C. Low, Caitlin S. Mallory, Gabriel C. Mel, Ben Sorscher, Alex H. Williams, Surya Ganguli, Lisa M. Giocomo, Daniel L.K. Yamins
bioRxiv 2021.10.30.466617; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.30.466617

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9118)
  • Bioengineering (6753)
  • Bioinformatics (23948)
  • Biophysics (12103)
  • Cancer Biology (9498)
  • Cell Biology (13745)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7618)
  • Ecology (11664)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10621)
  • Genomics (14297)
  • Immunology (9468)
  • Microbiology (22808)
  • Molecular Biology (9083)
  • Neuroscience (48895)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3826)
  • Plant Biology (8309)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2294)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)