Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A New Bioink for Improved 3D Bioprinting of Bone-Like Constructs

Adam C. Marsh, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Marcus Bunn, View ORCID ProfileChristopher H. Contag, Nureddin Ashammakhi, Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.04.467312
Adam C. Marsh
1Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ehsanul Hoque Apu
2Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Bunn
2Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher H. Contag
2Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
4Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher H. Contag
Nureddin Ashammakhi
2Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: n.ashammakhi@googlemail.com chatzist@msu.edu
Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
1Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: n.ashammakhi@googlemail.com chatzist@msu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Bone tissue loss can occur due to disease, trauma or following surgery, in each case treatment involving the use of bone grafts or biomaterials is usually required. Recent development of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting (3DBP) has enabled the printing of customized bone substitutes. Bioinks used for bone 3DBP employ various particulate phases such as ceramic and bioactive glass particles embedded in the bioink creating a composite. When composite bioinks are used for 3DBP based on extrusion, particles are heterogeneously distributed causing damage to cells due to stresses created during flow in the matrix of the composite. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop cell-friendly osteopromotive bioink mitigating the risk of cell damage due to the flow of particles. Towards this end, we have linked organic and inorganic components, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and Ag-doped bioactive glass (Ag-BaG), to produce a hybrid material, GelMA-Ag-BaG (GAB). The distribution of the elements present in the Ag-BaG in the resulting hybrid GAB structure was examined. Rheological properties of the resulting hydrogel and its printability, as well as the degree of swelling and degradation over time, were also evaluated. GAB was compared to GelMA alone and GelMA-Ag-BaG nanocomposites. Results showed the superiority of the hybrid GAB bioink in terms of homogenous distribution of the elements in the structure, rheological properties, printability, and degradation profiles. Accordingly, this new bioink represents a major advance for bone 3DBP.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 05, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A New Bioink for Improved 3D Bioprinting of Bone-Like Constructs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A New Bioink for Improved 3D Bioprinting of Bone-Like Constructs
Adam C. Marsh, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Marcus Bunn, Christopher H. Contag, Nureddin Ashammakhi, Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
bioRxiv 2021.11.04.467312; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.04.467312
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A New Bioink for Improved 3D Bioprinting of Bone-Like Constructs
Adam C. Marsh, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Marcus Bunn, Christopher H. Contag, Nureddin Ashammakhi, Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
bioRxiv 2021.11.04.467312; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.04.467312

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3686)
  • Biochemistry (7774)
  • Bioengineering (5668)
  • Bioinformatics (21245)
  • Biophysics (10563)
  • Cancer Biology (8162)
  • Cell Biology (11915)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6738)
  • Ecology (10388)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13843)
  • Genetics (9694)
  • Genomics (13056)
  • Immunology (8123)
  • Microbiology (19956)
  • Molecular Biology (7833)
  • Neuroscience (42973)
  • Paleontology (318)
  • Pathology (1276)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2256)
  • Physiology (3350)
  • Plant Biology (7208)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1309)
  • Synthetic Biology (1999)
  • Systems Biology (5528)
  • Zoology (1126)