Abstract
Cognitive variation is common among-individuals and can be consistent across time and context. From an evolutionary perspective, among-individual variation is important as a pre-requisite for natural selection and adaptive evolution. Selection is widely hypothesized to favor high cognitive performance but directional selection should erode variation over time, how then is cognitive variation maintained? As selection does not act on traits in isolation, covariance among specific cognitive traits and/or other aspects of phenotype (e.g. personality) could result in fitness trade-offs that are important in shaping evolutionary dynamics. Here we test this using Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), using a multivariate approach by characterising the correlation structure among task-specific cognitive performance measures and a personality trait. We estimate the among-individual correlation matrix (ID) in performance across three cognitive tasks; colour association learning task; motor learning task; reversal learning task, and the personality trait ‘boldness’ measured as emergence time from a shelter. We found no support for trade-offs among performance in these tasks. Nor do we find evidence of hypothesised speed-accuracy trade-offs within the association learning task. Rather we find strong positive correlation structure in ID, with 57% of variation explained by the leading eigen vector. While noting that non-cognitive factors and assay composition may affect the structure of ID, we suggest our findings are consistent with the g-model of cognitive performance variation, in which a dominant axis of variation loads positively on all performance measures. Thus, we add to a growing body of support for general variation among individuals in animal cognitive ability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
