Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Ancient DNA from a 2,700-year-old goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) confirms gazelle hunting in Iron Age Central Asia

View ORCID ProfileAndré Elias Rodrigues Soares, View ORCID ProfileNikolaus Boroffka, Oskar Schröder, Leonid Sverchkov, View ORCID ProfileNorbert Benecke, View ORCID ProfileTorsten Günther
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.471591
André Elias Rodrigues Soares
1Human Evolution Program, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
6Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for André Elias Rodrigues Soares
Nikolaus Boroffka
2Eurasia Department, German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nikolaus Boroffka
Oskar Schröder
3Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonid Sverchkov
4Institute of Fine Arts, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norbert Benecke
5Department of Natural Sciences, German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Norbert Benecke
Torsten Günther
1Human Evolution Program, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Torsten Günther
  • For correspondence: torsten.guenther@ebc.uu.se
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Central Asia has been an important region connecting the different parts of Eurasia throughout history and prehistory, with large states developing in this region during the Iron Age. Archaeogenomics is a powerful addition to the zooarchaeological toolkit for understanding the relation of these societies to animals. Here, we present the genetic identification of a goitered gazelle specimen (Gazella subgutturosa) at the site Gazimulla-Tepa, in modern-day Uzbekistan, confirming hunting of the species in the region during the Iron Age. The sample was directly radiocarbon dated to 2724-2439 calBP. A phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome places the individual into the modern variation of G. subgutturosa. Our data does represent both the first ancient DNA and the first nuclear DNA sequences of this species. The lack of genomic resources available for this gazelle and related species prevented us from performing a more in-depth analysis of the nuclear sequences generated. Therefore, we are making our sequence data available to the research community to facilitate other research of this nowadays threatened species which has been subject to human hunting for several millennia across its entire range on the Asian continent.

Introduction

The Surkhandary Region in South-eastern Uzbekistan as part of the ancient region of Bactria has been a focus for archaeological research for many years. Belonging to the Achaemenid Empire, the “First Persian Empire”, it was later conquered by Alexander the Great. Excavations at the fortress of Kurganzol produced well-stratified samples of many faunal remains, architectural features and finds, mainly from the late 4th century BC, providing insights into Alexander’s campaigns in Central Asia [1]. Prior to Alexander’s arrival, several important settlements in the region were located close to the modern town of Bandykhan/Bandixon, near the southern edge of the Baysun Basin [1,2,3]. Among the sites in this region is Gazimulla-Tepa (Bandykhan III, Figure 1a), a city-type settlement around a citadel dating to the pre-Achaemenian period (Yaz IIB period), from the 9th to the 6th centuries BC [4,5]. The radiocarbon date falls into the “Hallstatt Plateau”, and therefore does not allow a precise calibrated date. However, the archaeological context is the pre-Achaemenian period, locally named Yaz IIB [3,6], so that a date before the middle of the 6th century BC can be established. It was only under Cyrus II (the Great), that Central Asia was conquered and integrated into the Achaemenian Empire. This occurred around 546-540 BC [7], so that the site of Gazimulla-Tepe must be placed before the mid-6th century BC.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

(a) Locality in which the bone fragment was found is indicated on the map with a yellow star. The insert contains a photo of the bone fragment (sample AGAZ005, Gazimullah Y:2006 F:3). Black bar indicates 1 cm length. (b) DNA fragment length distribution short sequences characteristic of ancient DNA. (c) Misincorporation plots indicating DNA damage patterns towards the end of the sequencing reads, also congruent with authentic ancient DNA fragments.

People living in this region largely relied on domesticated animal species as most faunal remains of that time in the region belong to species such as sheep, cattle and horses. Hunting still played a non-negligible role in their lives as a number of bones from wild mammals such as deer, gazelles and wild boars are found at the sites [8].

Ancient DNA approaches are a powerful addition to the zooarchaeological toolkit allowing to assign species, ancestry, biological sex and/or certain traits to faunal remains (e.g. [9,10]). However, most studies have focused on domesticated animals instead of wild species that were hunted. In this study we sequenced DNA from an approximately 2700 years old bovid bone fragment excavated at Gazimulla-Tepa during the year 2006 (Figure 1a). The fragment was found among mostly domestic animal remains but we identify it as belonging to a goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa). The goitered gazelle was among the most commonly hunted animals in prehistoric central and western Asia [8,11–13], and yet this is the first ancient DNA generated from the species allowing us to genetically categorize its relationships with modern gazelle populations.

Material and Methods

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

We sampled ∼150 mg of bone fragment from the humerus bone specimen (Collection Accession ID Gazimullah Y:2006 F:3, originally from Gazimulla-Tepa, Surkhandarya Province, Uzbekistan, Figure 1a) at a dedicated ancient DNA facility at the Department of Organismal Biology of Uppsala University. Prior to sampling, the bone was mechanically cleaned with a Dremel drill and a 3.0% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by UVed water. We extracted DNA following [14].

After DNA extraction, we prepared two double-stranded Illumina DNA sequencing libraries following [15]. Between each step the libraries were cleaned using Sera-Mag SPRI SpeedBeads (ThermoScientific) in 18% PEG-8000. Both libraries were sequenced independently at the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI), SciLifeLab, Uppsala, on a NovaSeq 6000 Illumina DNA sequencer.

Radiocarbon Dating

An additional 980 mg of bone fragment was obtained from the initial bone sample for radiocarbon dating. The direct radiocarbon dating was performed at the Tandem Laboratory, Uppsala University, and the obtained radiocarbon age was 2495±30.

The date was then calibrated by using the R package rcarbon [16] with atmospheric data from [17] (Figure 2).

Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2:

Calibrated radiocarbon age of AGAZ005 using rcarbon [16] and atmospheric data from IntCal20 [17].

Data processing and authentication

We processed the resulting sequencing data by removing sequencing

adapters with CutAdapt [18], and merging the paired-end reads using Flash [19], requiring a minimum overlap of 11 bp and a maximum overlap of 150 bp. Due to the lack of a reference genome for the Gazelle genus we mapped the merged reads to the sheep genome Oar_v3.1 (GenBank assembly accession: GCA_000298735.1) in order to assess nucleotide misincorporation and damage patterns. We mapped the merged reads to the sheep reference genome using BWA aln parameters established for ancient DNA studies (“-l 1024 -n 0.01 -o 2”) [20], and created sorted BAM files with samtools 1.12 [21]. We removed PCR duplicates with Picard’s MarkDuplicate [22]. We also checked the biological sex of our sample using the Rx method [23] modified for a reference genome with 26 autosomes.

Species identification and mitochondrial genome assembly

We first used MEGAN v.6.20.19 [24] to taxonomically assign the sequenced reads. Furthermore, we assembled the mitochondrial genome by mapping the reads to different mitochondrial reference genomes (Table 1) using MIA (https://github.com/mpieva/mapping-iterative-assembler). MIA is an iterative assembler designed to be used with ancient DNA, improving alignment and consensus on chemically damaged DNA. The final consensus sequence for each assembly was called with each base having a minimum of 3-fold depth coverage and two-thirds base agreement.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1:

Sequencing information for both libraries. Mapped reads to the nuclear sheep genome, since there is no gazelle genome currently available.

Phylogenetic analysis

In order to investigate this newly assembled mitogenome, we downloaded an additional 66 complete mitochondrial genomes from NCBI from all major Bovidae clades (Supplementary Table 1). We aligned all 67 mitogenomes using MAFFT [25] and inspected the alignment in SeaView 5.0.4 [26]. We reconstructed its phylogenetic tree through a Bayesian framework in MrBayes 3.2.7 [27], and also by using a Maximum Likelihood approach in IQ-Tree [28,29]. We used a GTR+G nucleotide substitution model in both analyses [30,31]. In MrBayes we ran three independent chains for 2 million generations ensuring a split frequency standard deviation below 0.01. In IQ-Tree we ran 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Supplementary Figure 2).

Results

We sequenced about 56 million read pairs from two libraries. Approximately 4.3% of the merged reads mapped to the sheep reference genome (Table 1). The DNA sequences show fragmentation and deamination patterns characteristic for ancient DNA damages [32] indicating authenticity of the sequence data (Figure 1b and c). The sample was directly radiocarbon dated to 2725-2439 calBP (95.4% HDPI, Figure 2) confirming its Iron Age origin.

Species Identification

Initially, we attempted to identify the species of AGAZ005 by using the taxonomic assignment of sequences implemented in MEGAN [24]. Due to the lack of available Antilopinae sequencing data, BLAST-based taxon assignment indicates only the presence of Bovidae sequences, but does not allow for precise species identification (Supplementary Figure 1). Since identification was not possible through this metagenomics approach, and considering this bone was found among several sheep bones [8], we mapped the merged reads to the sheep (Ovis aries) mitochondrial genome reference sequence NC_001941.1 using MIA (https://github.com/mpieva/mapping-iterative-assembler). Upon initial inspection we found large stretches of poorly assembled regions of the mitochondrion, suggesting that the sequences do not originate from a sheep. We then performed a BLAST search (blastn) [33] using the partially assembled mitochondrial sequences. This allowed us to identify the fragmented assembly as goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa, 97% identity, Evalue = 1.9e-17). We identified this individual as a female, according to the results from the Rx method adapted from [23] (Rx = 0.818, 95% CI: 0.8027–0.8345), which is based on the number of sequencing reads mapping to the sheep X chromosome.

Mitochondrial Genome Assembly

In order to assemble an improved mitochondrial genome for this specimen we adopted a strategy that would also further strengthen our taxonomic identification results. We mapped the merged reads to multiple Bovidae species using MIA, as described above. We observed the number of mapping reads, and also how many MIA iterations were necessary for final convergence for the assembly (Table 2). The final assembly using the G. subgutturosa reference sequence not only had the highest number of mapping reads, but also required the least amount of iterative mapping to converge.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2:

Mitochondrial genome assemblies statistics.

Phylogenetic placement

We built a phylogenetic tree under a Bayesian framework to investigate the relationship between our ancient sample and modern gazelle specimens (Figure 3). This result also further solidifies the finding that this bone fragment belongs to a Gazella sp. individual. The phylogenetic tree indicates that our sample is more closely related to the modern Gazella sp. individuals from China and Turkmenistan, including the subspecies Gazella subgutturosa reginae [34], when compared to the sand gazelle (G. marica, [35]). Unfortunately, the present tree is unable to resolve the position of Cephalophini in relation to the gazelles. While the placement of Raphicerina and Procaprina in relation to Antilopina agrees with [36], support values are relatively low and disagrees with the results from the Maximum Likelihood tree (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 3:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3:

Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree for 68 mitochondrial genomes for a broad range of Bovidae species. In bold, our sample. In green the clade with all gazelle species represented in this tree.

Discussion

Our study represents a direct genetic confirmation that goitered gazelles have been hunted in Iron age Uzbekistan around 2725-2439 calBP (95.4% HDPI). This is consistent with morphological analyses of the faunal remains found in the region which lists goitered gazelles as most common wild species [8]. Furthermore, a recent study using Zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS, [37]) on faunal remains from Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Kyrgyzstan also classified some specimen found at human settlements as “deer/Saiga/gazelle” [38].

Goitered gazelles have been subject to human hunting for several millennia across its entire range on the Asian continent [8,13,39]. As a result of habitat loss in combination with hunting and poaching, the species has been declining and today it is classified as “vulnerable” by the IUCN. Our study takes a first step towards genomic and temporal studies of this wide-ranging ungulate. The lack of modern genome-wide data for goitered gazelles restricted the types of analysis we were able to perform. Our results indicate that this ancestral population is closely related to modern individuals that inhabit Turkmenistan and the Qaidam basin in China, but is unable to determine which subspecies of G. subgutturosa it belongs to. The structure and potential gene flow between subspecies as well as the presumed recent population decline, however, would make the goitered gazelle an interesting subject for broad geographic sampling and population genomic studies. Smaller-scale studies based on microsatellite markers have already suggested local population structure [40]. Temporal genomic data could substantially enhance such studies of long-term processes. The genomic sequences generated for this project can be directly assigned to a point in time and space, and should therefore facilitate future studies of the population history of G. subgutturosa.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (CTS 18:129) to AERS, OS and TG, a grant from The Royal Physiographic Society of Lund (Nilsson-Ehle Endowments) to AERS and a grant from the Swedish Research Council Vetenskapsrådet (2017-05267) to TG. Sequencing was performed by the SNP&SEQ Technology Platform in Uppsala. The facility is part of the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI) Sweden and Science for Life Laboratory. The SNP&SEQ Platform is also supported by the Swedish Research Council and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. The computations and data handling were enabled by resources in projects SNIC 2018/8-331, SNIC 2020/2-10, SNIC 2020/16-39 and uppstore2018187 provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX, partially funded by the Swedish Research Council through grant agreement no. 2018-05973. The joint Uzbek-German excavations at Gazimulla-Tepe were funded by the Eurasia Department of the German Archaeological Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

A.E.R.S., O.S. and T.G. designed the research; A.E.R.S. performed the research; N. Bo. and L.S. conducted the archaeological excavations and here describes the chronological context; N. Bo., O.S., L.S. and N. Be. contributed samples; A.E.R.S. and T.G. analyzed data; and A.E.R.S., N.B., and T.G. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Data accessibility

Raw sequencing reads are available from the European Nucleotide Archive under accession PRJEB46820. The mitogenome for AGAZ005 (Gazella subgutturosa) was deposited at GenBank, accession number XXXX.

Acknowledgements

We thank everyone involved in the excavations for their contributions.

Footnotes

  • https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB46820

References

  1. 1.↵
    Sverchkov L. 2008 The kurganzol fortress (on the history of central Asia in the Hellenistic era). Anc. civiliz. Scythia Sib. 14, 123–191.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Sverchkov L, Boroffka N, 2007 Археологические исследования в Бандихане в г Труды Байсунской Научной Экспедиции Археология История и Этнография 3, 2007, 97–141..
  3. 3.↵
    Sverchkov LM, Fine Arts Scientific Research Institute Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, Boroffka N, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. 2016 Period of yaz-ii: Stages and chronology. VESTN. ARHEOL. ANTROPOL. ETNOGR., 005–018.
  4. 4.↵
    Hansen S, Tellenbach M, Wieczorek A. 2009 Alexander der Grosse und die Öffnung der Welt: Asiens Kulturen im Wandel. Schnell & Steiner.
  5. 5.↵
    1. S Hansen,
    2. A Wieczorek,
    3. M Tellenbach
    Boroffka N. 2009 Siedlungsgeschichte in Nordbaktrien – Bandichan zwischen Spätbronzezeit und Frühmittelalter. In Alexander der Große und die Öffnung der Welt - Asiens Kulturen im Wandel (eds S Hansen, A Wieczorek, M Tellenbach), pp. 135–143. Zeughaus C5, 68159 Mannheim: Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wagner M
    Boroffka, NGO, Sverchkov LM 2013 The Jaz II and III period pottery. Classification and chronology viewed from Bandykhan, Southern Uzbekistan. In: Wagner M (ed), Pottery chronology of the Early Iron Age in Central Asia. Warszawa: Kazimierz Michałowski Foundation, Institute of Archaeology, University of Warsaw, 49–74.
  7. 7.↵
    2003 P. Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander. A History of the Persian Empire, translated from French by P.T. Daniels, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Indiana 2002, XX 1196 pp., illustrations. Cased. ISBN 1-57506-031-0. Ancient West & East., 38–40. (doi:10.1163/9789004495432_016)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sverchkov L.
    Benecke R. 2013 Faunal remains of Kurganzol. In: Sverchkov L. 2013 Kurganzol: krepost’Aleksandra na yuge Uzbekistana, Tashkent: SMI-Asia, 172–178.
  9. 9.↵
    Manin A, Lebrasseur O. 2021 Zooarchaeology and Ancient DNA, part 1: a brief review of the methods and applications. Povolzhskaya Arkheologiya (The Volga River Region Archaeology). 1, 187–195. (doi:10.24852/pa2021.1.35.187.195)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Rosengren E et al. 2021 Ancient Faunal History Revealed by Interdisciplinary Biomolecular Approaches. Diversity. 13, 370. (doi:10.3390/d13080370)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Groucutt HS, Christopher Carleton W. 2021 Mass-kill hunting and Late Quaternary ecology: New insights into the ‘desert kite’ phenomenon in Arabia. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 37, 102995. (doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102995)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.
    Crassard R et al. 2015 Addressing the Desert Kites Phenomenon and Its Global Range Through a Multi-proxy Approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 22, 1093–1121. (doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9218-7)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Lang C, Peters J, Pöllath N, Schmidt K, Grupe G. 2013 Gazelle behaviour and human presence at early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-east Anatolia. World Archaeology. 45, 410–429. (doi:10.1080/00438243.2013.820648)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Rohland N, Glocke I, Aximu-Petri A, Meyer M. 2018 Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2447–2461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Meyer M, Kircher M. 2010 Illumina Sequencing Library Preparation for Highly Multiplexed Target Capture and Sequencing. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2010, db.prot5448–pdb.prot5448. (doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448)
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Crema ER, Bevan A. 2021 Inference from large sets of radiocarbon dates: Software and Methods. Radiocarbon. 63, 23–39. (doi:10.1017/rdc.2020.95)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Reimer PJ et al. 2020 The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon. 62, 725–757. (doi:10.1017/rdc.2020.41)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Martin M. 2011 Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal. 17, 10. (doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011 FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Li H, Durbin R. 2010 Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Li H et al. 2009 The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25, 2078–2079. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Broad Institute. 2019 Picard Toolkit. Broad Institute, GitHub repository
  23. 23.↵
    Mittnik A, Wang C-C, Svoboda J, Krause J. 2016 A Molecular Approach to the Sexing of the Triple Burial at the Upper Paleolithic Site of Dolní Věstonice. PLOS ONE. 11, e0163019. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163019)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Huson DH, Beier S, Flade I, Górska A, El-Hadidi M, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H-J, Tappu R. 2016 MEGAN Community Edition - Interactive Exploration and Analysis of Large-Scale Microbiome Sequencing Data. PLOS Computational Biology. 12, e1004957. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004957)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-I, Miyata T. 2002 MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2010 SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 221–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Ronquist F et al. 2012 MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology. 61, 539–542. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys029)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015 IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2016 W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W232–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Miura RM. 1986 Some Mathematical Questions in Biology: DNA Sequence Analysis. American Mathematical Soc.
  31. 31.↵
    Yang Z. 1993 Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1396–1401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Briggs AW et al. 2007 Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 14616–14621.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990 Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Qin W, Li J, Xu C, Yang L. 2021 Complete mitochondrial genome of (Bovidae: Antilopinae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour 6, 2310–2312.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Fadakar D, Mirzakhah M, Naderi S, Bärmann EV, Nasari MN, Gorji FM, Rezaei HR. 2019 The first record of mitochondrial haplotypes of Gazella marica (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) in wild populations in Iran. Mammalian Biology. 95, 181–187. (doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2018.05.011)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    Bärmann EV, Rössner GE, Wörheide G. 2013 A revised phylogeny of Antilopini (Bovidae, Artiodactyla) using combined mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67, 484–493.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Buckley M, Collins M, Thomas-Oates J, Wilson JC. 2009 Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 23, 3843–3854.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Taylor WTT et al. 2021 Evidence for early dispersal of domestic sheep into Central Asia. Nat Hum Behav (doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01083-y)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    Bar-Oz G, Zeder M, Hole F. 2011 Role of mass-kill hunting strategies in the extirpation of Persian gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in the northern Levant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 7345–7350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Khosravi R, Hemami M-R, Malekian M, Silva TL, Rezaei H-R, Brito JC. 2018 Effect of landscape features on genetic structure of the goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Central Iran. Conservation Genetics. 19, 323–336. (doi:10.1007/s10592-017-1002-2)
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 10, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ancient DNA from a 2,700-year-old goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) confirms gazelle hunting in Iron Age Central Asia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Ancient DNA from a 2,700-year-old goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) confirms gazelle hunting in Iron Age Central Asia
André Elias Rodrigues Soares, Nikolaus Boroffka, Oskar Schröder, Leonid Sverchkov, Norbert Benecke, Torsten Günther
bioRxiv 2021.12.08.471591; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.471591
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Ancient DNA from a 2,700-year-old goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) confirms gazelle hunting in Iron Age Central Asia
André Elias Rodrigues Soares, Nikolaus Boroffka, Oskar Schröder, Leonid Sverchkov, Norbert Benecke, Torsten Günther
bioRxiv 2021.12.08.471591; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.08.471591

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4682)
  • Biochemistry (10357)
  • Bioengineering (7670)
  • Bioinformatics (26330)
  • Biophysics (13523)
  • Cancer Biology (10683)
  • Cell Biology (15438)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8497)
  • Ecology (12820)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16851)
  • Genetics (11399)
  • Genomics (15478)
  • Immunology (10616)
  • Microbiology (25207)
  • Molecular Biology (10220)
  • Neuroscience (54463)
  • Paleontology (401)
  • Pathology (1668)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2897)
  • Physiology (4342)
  • Plant Biology (9243)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1586)
  • Synthetic Biology (2557)
  • Systems Biology (6780)
  • Zoology (1466)