New Results
Failure to account for behavioral variability significantly compromises accuracy in indirect population monitoring
View ORCID ProfileErin G. Wessling, Martin Surbeck
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.473935
Erin G. Wessling
1Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
2School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
Martin Surbeck
1Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
3Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Article usage
Posted November 19, 2022.
Failure to account for behavioral variability significantly compromises accuracy in indirect population monitoring
Erin G. Wessling, Martin Surbeck
bioRxiv 2021.12.22.473935; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.473935
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11715)
- Bioengineering (8723)
- Bioinformatics (29129)
- Biophysics (14936)
- Cancer Biology (12049)
- Cell Biology (17359)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9406)
- Ecology (14144)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18268)
- Genetics (12221)
- Genomics (16767)
- Immunology (11843)
- Microbiology (28014)
- Molecular Biology (11560)
- Neuroscience (60814)
- Paleontology (450)
- Pathology (1864)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3231)
- Physiology (4940)
- Plant Biology (10384)
- Synthetic Biology (2878)
- Systems Biology (7333)
- Zoology (1642)