Abstract
Background Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (aTDCS) of primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can enhance corticomotor excitability. Yet, it is still unknown which current intensity produces the strongest effect on regional neural activity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling (pc-ASL MRI) can map regional cortical blood flow (rCBF) and may thus be useful to probe the relationship between current intensity and neural response at the individual level.
Objective Here we employed pc-ASL MRI to map acute rCBF changes during short-duration aTDCS of left M1-HAND. Using the rCBF response as a proxy for regional neuronal activity, we investigated if short-duration aTDCS produces an instantaneous dose-dependent rCBF increase in the targeted M1-HAND that may be useful for individual dosing.
Methods Nine healthy right-handed participants received 30 seconds of aTDCS at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mA with the anode placed over left M1-HAND and cathode over the right supraorbital region. Concurrent pc-ASL MRI at 3 T probed TDCS-related rCBF changes in the targeted M1-HAND. Movement-induced rCBF changes were also assessed.
Results Apart from a subtle increase in rCBF at 0.5 mA, short-duration aTDCS did not modulate rCBF in the M1-HAND relative to no-stimulation periods. None of the participants showed a dose-dependent increase in rCBF during aTDCS, even after accounting for individual differences in TDCS-induced electrical field strength. In contrast, finger movements led to robust activation of left M1-HAND before and after aTDCS.
Conclusion Short-duration bipolar aTDCS does not produce instantaneous dose-dependent rCBF increases in the targeted M1-HAND at conventional intensity ranges.
Therefore, the regional hemodynamic response profile to short-duration aTDCS may not be suited to inform individual dosing of TDCS intensity.
Highlights
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI probed regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during anodal TDCS.
Short-duration anodal TDCS was applied to left motor hand area (M1-HAND) at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mA.
Anodal TDCS produced no instantaneous dose-dependent rCBF increase in left M1-HAND.
Apart from a subtle increase at 0.5 mA, rCBF was not modified in M1-HAND during anodal TDCS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.