Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Confirmatory Results

Dogma and belief: the primary lesion in age-related hearing loss is old news

View ORCID ProfileDavid McAlpine, View ORCID ProfileHeivet Hernandez-Perez, Mark Seeto, View ORCID ProfileBrent Edwards
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.14.472488
David McAlpine
1Department of Linguistics, The Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David McAlpine
  • For correspondence: david.mcalpine@mq.edu.au
Heivet Hernandez-Perez
1Department of Linguistics, The Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heivet Hernandez-Perez
Mark Seeto
2National Acoustic Laboratories, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brent Edwards
2National Acoustic Laboratories, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brent Edwards
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Presbycusis, or age-related hearing loss, is the most common sensory deficit globally, and the biggest modifiable risk factor for a later dementia diagnosis. Despite its ubiquity, however, the primary pathology contributing to presbycusis is reportedly contentious, particularly the relative role of damage to the sensory outer hair cells compared to the stria vascularis, an important inner ear structure that maintains the ionic concentration of inner ear fluids that surround it. To determine what might be the “dogma” of the field regarding the primary pathology in presbycusis, we conducted an online Google survey (https://forms.gle/GPreoePmRxBBkchc7) asking relevant respondents in the field their opinions on the matter. In Question (Q1), respondents were asked to rate ‘in your opinion’ from ‘least likely’ to ‘most likely’ (on a scale 1 to 4 [being ‘most likely’]) ‘what is the primary pathology contributing to presbycusis?’ in terms of ‘damage to’: i) the inner hair cells, ii) outer hair cells (OHCs), iii) spiral ganglion, iv) stria vascularis. The term ‘dogma’ suggests that the proportion of people in the field who believe that the main cause of presbycusis is damage to the stria vascularis is at least 50%. The results of our survey estimated this proportion to be 19/101 = 0.188 (95% CI [0.124 0.275]) and a two-sided test of the null hypothesis that this proportion is at least 0.5 was rejected (p < 10−10). When it came to opining what ‘other professionals in the field consider to be the primary pathology contributing to presbycusis’ (Q2), the tendency to rank ‘damage to OHCs’ as being the primary pathology was 45%. Stria vascularis was least likely to be ranked 4 (11%) by professionals in the field opining about the beliefs of others. Even when ‘noise damage was excluded’ as a factor (Q3), the ‘most likely’ contributing factor to presbycusis was stated to be damage to the OHCs (42%). Our data suggest the dogma of the field is that damage to outer hair cells is the primary pathology in presbycusis.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://doi.org/10.25949/17009321.v1

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 19, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dogma and belief: the primary lesion in age-related hearing loss is old news
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dogma and belief: the primary lesion in age-related hearing loss is old news
David McAlpine, Heivet Hernandez-Perez, Mark Seeto, Brent Edwards
bioRxiv 2022.01.14.472488; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.14.472488
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Dogma and belief: the primary lesion in age-related hearing loss is old news
David McAlpine, Heivet Hernandez-Perez, Mark Seeto, Brent Edwards
bioRxiv 2022.01.14.472488; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.14.472488

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4658)
  • Biochemistry (10311)
  • Bioengineering (7631)
  • Bioinformatics (26222)
  • Biophysics (13464)
  • Cancer Biology (10640)
  • Cell Biology (15358)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8462)
  • Ecology (12771)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16782)
  • Genetics (11368)
  • Genomics (15421)
  • Immunology (10566)
  • Microbiology (25081)
  • Molecular Biology (10170)
  • Neuroscience (54216)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1659)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2878)
  • Physiology (4321)
  • Plant Biology (9207)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1582)
  • Synthetic Biology (2543)
  • Systems Biology (6759)
  • Zoology (1455)