Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees

View ORCID ProfileMarie Guiraud, Mark Roper, Stephan Wolf, View ORCID ProfileJoseph L. Woodgate, Lars Chittka
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.17.476662
Marie Guiraud
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marie Guiraud
  • For correspondence: m.g.guiraud@gmail.com
Mark Roper
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
2Drone Development Lab, Ben Thorns Ltd, Colchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Wolf
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph L. Woodgate
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph L. Woodgate
Lars Chittka
1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Simple feature detectors in the visual system, such as edge-detectors, are likely to underlie even the most complex visual processing, so understanding the limits of these systems is crucial for a fuller understanding of visual processing. We investigated the ability of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to discriminate between differently angled edges. In a multiple-choice, “meadow-like” scenario, bumblebees successfully discriminated between angled bars with 7° differences, significantly exceeding the previously reported performance of eastern honeybees (Apis cerana, limit: 15°). Neither the number of choices required to learn, nor the bees’ final discrimination performance were affected by the angular orientation of the training bars, indicating a uniform performance across the visual field. Previous work has found that, in dual-choice tests, eastern honeybees cannot reliably discriminate between angles with less than 25° difference, suggesting that performance in discrimination tasks is affected by the training regime, and doesn’t simply reflect the perceptual limitations of the visual system. We used high resolution LCD monitors to investigate the limits of bumblebees’ angular resolution in dual-choice experiments. Bumblebee could still discriminate 7° angle differences under such conditions (exceeding the previously reported limit for Apis mellifera, of 10°, as well as that of A. cerana), eventually reaching similar levels of accuracy, but required longer learning periods than under multiple-choice conditions. Bumblebees show impressive abilities to discriminate between angled edges, performing better than two previously tested species of honeybee. This high performance may, in turn, support complex visual processing in the bumblebee brain.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 17, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees
Marie Guiraud, Mark Roper, Stephan Wolf, Joseph L. Woodgate, Lars Chittka
bioRxiv 2022.01.17.476662; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.17.476662
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees
Marie Guiraud, Mark Roper, Stephan Wolf, Joseph L. Woodgate, Lars Chittka
bioRxiv 2022.01.17.476662; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.17.476662

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3513)
  • Biochemistry (7358)
  • Bioengineering (5334)
  • Bioinformatics (20290)
  • Biophysics (10032)
  • Cancer Biology (7753)
  • Cell Biology (11323)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6442)
  • Ecology (9962)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13340)
  • Genetics (9364)
  • Genomics (12594)
  • Immunology (7717)
  • Microbiology (19055)
  • Molecular Biology (7452)
  • Neuroscience (41085)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1232)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2140)
  • Physiology (3169)
  • Plant Biology (6867)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1275)
  • Synthetic Biology (1899)
  • Systems Biology (5320)
  • Zoology (1089)