Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards after Automated Detection

View ORCID ProfileDrew Blount, View ORCID ProfileEve Bohnett, View ORCID ProfileJason Holmberg, View ORCID ProfileJason Parham, Sorosh Poya Faryabi, Örjan Johansson, View ORCID ProfileLi An, View ORCID ProfileBilal Ahmad, Wajid Khan, View ORCID ProfileStephane Ostrowski
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477059
Drew Blount
1Wild Me, 1726 N Terry Street, Portland, OR, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Drew Blount
Eve Bohnett
2Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
3Center for Complex Human-Environment Systems, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
4Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard Bronx, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eve Bohnett
  • For correspondence: ebohnett@sdsu.edu
Jason Holmberg
1Wild Me, 1726 N Terry Street, Portland, OR, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason Holmberg
Jason Parham
1Wild Me, 1726 N Terry Street, Portland, OR, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason Parham
Sorosh Poya Faryabi
4Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard Bronx, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Örjan Johansson
5Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
6Snow Leopard Trust, Seattle, WA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li An
3Center for Complex Human-Environment Systems, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
7Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Li An
Bilal Ahmad
8Institute of Agriculture Sciences and Forestry, University of Swat, Mingora, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bilal Ahmad
Wajid Khan
9Department of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, University of Swat, Mingora, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephane Ostrowski
4Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard Bronx, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephane Ostrowski
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

1. Photo-identification of individual snow leopards (Panthera uncia) is the primary technique for density estimation for the species. A high volume of images from multiple projects, combined with pre-existing historical catalogs, has made identifying snow leopard individuals within the images cost- and time-intensive. 2. To speed the classification among a high volume of photographs, we trained and evaluated image classification methods for PIE v2 (a triplet loss network), and we compared PIE’s accuracy to the HotSpotter algorithm (a SIFT based algorithm). Analyzed data were collected from a curated catalog of free-ranging snow leopards photographed across years (2012-2019) in Afghanistan and from samples in captivity provided by zoos from Finland, Sweden, Germany, and the United States. 3. Results show that PIE outperforms HotSpotter. We also found weaknesses in the initial PIE model, like a minor amount of background matching, which was addressed, although likely not fully resolved, by applying background subtraction (BGS) and left-right mirroring (LR) methods. The PIE BGS LR model combined with Hotspotter showed a Rank-1: 85%, Rank-5: 95%, Rank-20: 99%. 4. Overall, our results recommend implementing PIE v2 simultaneously with HotSpotter on Whiskerbook.org.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 22, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards after Automated Detection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards after Automated Detection
Drew Blount, Eve Bohnett, Jason Holmberg, Jason Parham, Sorosh Poya Faryabi, Örjan Johansson, Li An, Bilal Ahmad, Wajid Khan, Stephane Ostrowski
bioRxiv 2022.01.20.477059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477059
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of Two Individual Identification Algorithms for Snow Leopards after Automated Detection
Drew Blount, Eve Bohnett, Jason Holmberg, Jason Parham, Sorosh Poya Faryabi, Örjan Johansson, Li An, Bilal Ahmad, Wajid Khan, Stephane Ostrowski
bioRxiv 2022.01.20.477059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477059

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6767)
  • Bioinformatics (23970)
  • Biophysics (12109)
  • Cancer Biology (9511)
  • Cell Biology (13753)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11675)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15492)
  • Genetics (10632)
  • Genomics (14310)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22824)
  • Molecular Biology (9087)
  • Neuroscience (48920)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3841)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6180)
  • Zoology (1299)