Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study

View ORCID ProfileRoberto M. de Freitas, View ORCID ProfileMarco Capogrosso, View ORCID ProfileTaishin Nomura, View ORCID ProfileMatija Milosevic
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.02.478757
Roberto M. de Freitas
1Graduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto M. de Freitas
Marco Capogrosso
2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
3Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
4Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marco Capogrosso
Taishin Nomura
1Graduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Taishin Nomura
Matija Milosevic
1Graduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matija Milosevic
  • For correspondence: matija@ieee.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a promising technology that can support motor function recovery of upper-limbs after spinal cord injury. Its efficacy may depend on the ability to recruit sensory afferents and convey excitatory inputs onto motoneurons. Therefore, understanding its physiological mechanisms is critical to accelerate its development towards clinical applications. In this study, we used an anatomically realistic computational model of the cervical spine to compare α-motor, Aα-sensory, and Aβ-sensory fiber activation thresholds and activation sites.

Approach We developed a tridimensional geometry of the cervical body and tSCS electrodes with a cathode centred at the C7 spinous process and an anode placed over the anterior neck. The geometrical model was used to estimate the electric potential distributions along motor and sensory fiber trajectories at the C7 spinal level using a finite element method. We implemented dedicated motor and sensory fiber models to simulate the α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers using 12, 16, and 20 μm diameter fibers, and Aβ-sensory fibers using 6, 9, and 12 μm diameter fibers. We estimated nerve fiber activation thresholds and sites for a 2 ms monophasic stimulating pulse and compared them across the fiber groups.

Main results Our results showed lower activation thresholds of Aα- and Aβ-sensory fibers compared with α-motor fibers, suggesting preferential sensory fiber activation. We also found no differences between activation thresholds of Aα-sensory and large Aβ-sensory fibers, implying they were co-activated. The activation sites were located at the dorsal and ventral root levels.

Significance Using a realistic computational model, we demonstrated preferential activation of dorsal root Aα- and Aβ-sensory fibers compared with ventral root α-motor fibers during cervical tSCS. These findings suggest high proprioceptive and cutaneous contributions to neural activations during cervical tSCS, which inform the underlying mechanisms of upper-limb functional motor recovery.

Competing Interest Statement

M.C. holds several patents on spinal cord stimulation technologies for motor recovery, additionally he is a shareholder of Reach Neuro Inc., a company developing spinal cord stimulation for post-stroke motor recovery. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 06, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study
Roberto M. de Freitas, Marco Capogrosso, Taishin Nomura, Matija Milosevic
bioRxiv 2022.02.02.478757; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.02.478757
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study
Roberto M. de Freitas, Marco Capogrosso, Taishin Nomura, Matija Milosevic
bioRxiv 2022.02.02.478757; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.02.478757

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4087)
  • Biochemistry (8764)
  • Bioengineering (6479)
  • Bioinformatics (23344)
  • Biophysics (11750)
  • Cancer Biology (9149)
  • Cell Biology (13255)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7417)
  • Ecology (11369)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15087)
  • Genetics (10399)
  • Genomics (14009)
  • Immunology (9121)
  • Microbiology (22041)
  • Molecular Biology (8779)
  • Neuroscience (47372)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8050)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2208)
  • Systems Biology (6016)
  • Zoology (1250)