Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are essential to understanding biological pathways as well as their roles in development and disease. Computational tools have been successful at predicting PPIs in silico, but the lack of consistent and reliable frameworks for this task has led to network models that are difficult to compare and, overall, a low level of trust in the PPI predictions. To better understand the underlying mechanisms that underpin these models, we designed B4PPI, an open-source framework for benchmarking that accounts for a range of biological and statistical pitfalls while facilitating reproducibility. We use B4PPI to shed light on the impact of network topology and how different algorithms deal with highly connected proteins. By studying functional genomics-based and sequence-based models (the two most popular approaches) on human PPIs, we show their complementarity as the former performs best on lone proteins while the latter specialises in interactions involving hubs. We also show that algorithm design has little impact on performance with functional genomic data. We replicate our results between both human and S. Cerevisiae data and demonstrate that models using functional genomics are better suited to PPI prediction across species. With rapidly increasing amounts of sequence and functional genomics data, our study provides a systematic foundation for future construction, comparison and application of PPI networks.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Supplementary figure 5 had an error (overlap plot was was a dupplicate of Supp figure 2).
