Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Substrate topology and cognate immunity modulate antibacterial toxicity of Tae cell wall hydrolases

Atanas Radkov, Anne Sapiro, Sebastian Flores, Corey Henderson, Hayden Saunders, Rachel Kim, Steven Massa, Samuel Thompson, Chase Mateusiak, Jacob Biboy, Ziyi Zhao, Lea M Starita, William Hatleberg, Waldemar Vollmer, Alistair B Russell, Jean-Pierre Simorre, Spencer Anthony-Cahill, Peter Brzovic, Beth Hayes, Seemay Chou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.15.480620
Atanas Radkov
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Sapiro
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Flores
2University of Miami, Miami, FL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey Henderson
3InBios International, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hayden Saunders
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Kim
4Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Massa
5Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Thompson
6Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chase Mateusiak
7Computer Science Department, University of Washington in St Louis, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob Biboy
8Center for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ziyi Zhao
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lea M Starita
9Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
10Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Hatleberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Waldemar Vollmer
8Center for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alistair B Russell
11Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Simorre
12Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, IBS, Grenoble, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer Anthony-Cahill
13Chemistry Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Brzovic
14Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Hayes
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seemay Chou
1Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: seemay.chou@ucsf.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Members of the bacterial T6SS amidase effector (Tae) superfamily of toxins are delivered between competing bacteria to degrade cell wall peptidoglycan. Although Taes share a common substrate, they exhibit distinct antimicrobial potency across different competitor species. To investigate the molecular basis governing these differences, we quantitatively defined the functional determinants of Tae1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and a high-throughput in vivo genetic approach called deep mutational scanning (DMS). As expected, combined analyses confirmed the role of critical residues near the Tae1 catalytic center. Unexpectedly, DMS revealed substantial contributions to enzymatic activity from a much larger, ring-like functional hot spot extending around the entire circumference of the enzyme. Comparative DMS across distinct growth conditions highlighted how functional contribution of different surfaces is highly context-dependent, varying alongside composition of targeted cell walls. These observations suggest that Tae1 engages with the intact cell wall network through a more distributed three-dimensional interaction interface than previously appreciated, providing an explanation for observed differences in antimicrobial potency across divergent Gram-negative competitors. Further binding studies of several Tae1 variants with their cognate immunity protein demonstrate that requirements to maintain protection from Tae activity may be a significant constraint on the mutational landscape of tae1 toxicity in the wild. In total, our work reveals that Tae diversification has likely been shaped by multiple independent pressures to maintain interactions with binding partners that vary across bacterial species and conditions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 16, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Substrate topology and cognate immunity modulate antibacterial toxicity of Tae cell wall hydrolases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Substrate topology and cognate immunity modulate antibacterial toxicity of Tae cell wall hydrolases
Atanas Radkov, Anne Sapiro, Sebastian Flores, Corey Henderson, Hayden Saunders, Rachel Kim, Steven Massa, Samuel Thompson, Chase Mateusiak, Jacob Biboy, Ziyi Zhao, Lea M Starita, William Hatleberg, Waldemar Vollmer, Alistair B Russell, Jean-Pierre Simorre, Spencer Anthony-Cahill, Peter Brzovic, Beth Hayes, Seemay Chou
bioRxiv 2022.02.15.480620; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.15.480620
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Substrate topology and cognate immunity modulate antibacterial toxicity of Tae cell wall hydrolases
Atanas Radkov, Anne Sapiro, Sebastian Flores, Corey Henderson, Hayden Saunders, Rachel Kim, Steven Massa, Samuel Thompson, Chase Mateusiak, Jacob Biboy, Ziyi Zhao, Lea M Starita, William Hatleberg, Waldemar Vollmer, Alistair B Russell, Jean-Pierre Simorre, Spencer Anthony-Cahill, Peter Brzovic, Beth Hayes, Seemay Chou
bioRxiv 2022.02.15.480620; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.15.480620

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biochemistry
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4654)
  • Biochemistry (10298)
  • Bioengineering (7614)
  • Bioinformatics (26189)
  • Biophysics (13445)
  • Cancer Biology (10620)
  • Cell Biology (15333)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8452)
  • Ecology (12754)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16762)
  • Genetics (11356)
  • Genomics (15400)
  • Immunology (10548)
  • Microbiology (25041)
  • Molecular Biology (10151)
  • Neuroscience (54094)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1655)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2877)
  • Physiology (4314)
  • Plant Biology (9196)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1579)
  • Synthetic Biology (2541)
  • Systems Biology (6752)
  • Zoology (1452)