Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Contradictory Results

Comparison of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound with Computational Fluid Dynamics: Responses to Physiological Stimuli

View ORCID ProfileHarrison T. Caddy, Hannah J. Thomas, View ORCID ProfileLachlan J. Kelsey, View ORCID ProfileKurt J. Smith, View ORCID ProfileBarry J. Doyle, View ORCID ProfileDaniel J. Green
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.480470
Harrison T. Caddy
1Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
2School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Harrison T. Caddy
Hannah J. Thomas
3School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lachlan J. Kelsey
1Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
2School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lachlan J. Kelsey
Kurt J. Smith
3School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
4Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kurt J. Smith
Barry J. Doyle
1Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
2School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
5Australian Research Council Centre for Personalised Therapeutics Technologies, Melbourne, Australia
6British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Barry J. Doyle
  • For correspondence: barry.doyle@uwa.edu.au
Daniel J. Green
3School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel J. Green
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Few studies have compared transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound with independent techniques such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, particularly in response to stimuli. We compared TCD cerebral blood flow velocity in healthy participants with subject-specific CFD simulations to determine differences in techniques. Twelve participants underwent head and neck imaging with 3 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography. Velocity waveforms in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were measured with TCD while velocity and diameter in the neck arteries were measured with duplex ultrasound at rest, hypercapnia and exercise. Subject-specific CFD simulations were developed for each condition, with velocity waveforms extracted in the same region as TCD. We found that absolute TCD velocities were significantly higher than CFD data, and non-significantly correlated across all conditions (r range 0.030-0.377, all P>0.05). However, relative changes from rest to hypercapnia and exercise generally exhibited significant positive correlations (r range 0.448-0.770), with the strongest correlation being average velocity change from rest to exercise (r=0.770, P<0.01). We have found that although absolute MCA velocity measurements from different sources vary, relative velocity changes yield stronger correlations regardless of source. Our findings indicate relative responses to physiological stimuli, along with absolute data, should be considered for analyzing cerebral blood flow velocity.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint senior authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 25, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound with Computational Fluid Dynamics: Responses to Physiological Stimuli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound with Computational Fluid Dynamics: Responses to Physiological Stimuli
Harrison T. Caddy, Hannah J. Thomas, Lachlan J. Kelsey, Kurt J. Smith, Barry J. Doyle, Daniel J. Green
bioRxiv 2022.02.22.480470; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.480470
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound with Computational Fluid Dynamics: Responses to Physiological Stimuli
Harrison T. Caddy, Hannah J. Thomas, Lachlan J. Kelsey, Kurt J. Smith, Barry J. Doyle, Daniel J. Green
bioRxiv 2022.02.22.480470; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.22.480470

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4082)
  • Biochemistry (8754)
  • Bioengineering (6475)
  • Bioinformatics (23331)
  • Biophysics (11730)
  • Cancer Biology (9142)
  • Cell Biology (13235)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7407)
  • Ecology (11364)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15081)
  • Genetics (10395)
  • Genomics (14005)
  • Immunology (9114)
  • Microbiology (22033)
  • Molecular Biology (8777)
  • Neuroscience (47337)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1419)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2480)
  • Physiology (3702)
  • Plant Biology (8044)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1430)
  • Synthetic Biology (2206)
  • Systems Biology (6013)
  • Zoology (1248)